[PATCH 1/1] cli/show: avoid empty write to stdout in format_part_raw

2019-04-27 Thread Rob Browning
Previously (at least) if the input was exactly 4096 bytes long, notmuch would attempt to fwrite nothing to stdout, but still expected fwrite to return 1, causing a failure that looked like this: $ notmuch show --format=raw id:87o96f1cya@codeaurora.org ...entire message shown as

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Store and search for canonical Unicode text [WIP]

2015-09-05 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> writes: > David Bremner <da...@tethera.net> writes: >> It seems plausible to specify UTF-8 input for the library, but what >> about the CLI? It seems like the canonicalization operation increases >> the chance of manglin

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Store and search for canonical Unicode text [WIP]

2015-09-02 Thread Rob Browning
e. But those kind of details can > wait. Right, I wasn't sure what the policies were, so in most cases, I just tried to release the data when it was no longer needed. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0

[PATCH 1/1] Store and search for canonical Unicode text [WIP]

2015-08-30 Thread Rob Browning
quot;tag"), u8_tag); +talloc_free ((char *) u8_tag); _notmuch_string_list_append (query->exclude_terms, term); } diff --git a/lib/text-util.cc b/lib/text-util.cc new file mode 100644 index 000..9dfd31f --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/text-util.cc @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +/* text-util.cc - n

WARNING: database upgrade coming

2014-03-18 Thread Rob Browning
Jani Nikula writes: > Something like this? Just insert text that makes sense to the user. ;) If you decide to go this route, I wonder if it might also be worth adding the text about interruption being OK. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 D

Re: WARNING: database upgrade coming

2014-03-18 Thread Rob Browning
Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes: Something like this? Just insert text that makes sense to the user. ;) If you decide to go this route, I wonder if it might also be worth adding the text about interruption being OK. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10

[DRAFT PATCH] notmuch new: do not ignore '.notmuch' in non-toplevel directories

2014-03-01 Thread Rob Browning
ely. In any case, while I might prefer a very narrow test (as long as it wasn't unduly expensive), all of the proposed solutions would have handled my situation. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GP

Re: [DRAFT PATCH] notmuch new: do not ignore '.notmuch' in non-toplevel directories

2014-03-01 Thread Rob Browning
narrow test (as long as it wasn't unduly expensive), all of the proposed solutions would have handled my situation. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0

[BUG] Putting "tags=;" into .notmuch-config will create empty tags

2014-02-22 Thread Rob Browning
put: notmuch dump --format=batch-tag 'tag:""' | perl -pe 's/^\+ //' \ | notmuch restore --format=batch-tag And note that you have to use restore, "notmuch tag --batch" doesn't appear to accept "- " as a tag, even though dump will produce "+ ". Hope this help

[BUG] notmuch excludes .notmuch anywhere in the tree

2014-02-22 Thread Rob Browning
quot;[path]/Maildir/.notmuch". Though this isn't a critical problem for me. For now, I just rewrote my procmail rules and renamed the directory to .notmuchmail. Hope this helps -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED

[BUG] notmuch excludes .notmuch anywhere in the tree

2014-02-22 Thread Rob Browning
this isn't a critical problem for me. For now, I just rewrote my procmail rules and renamed the directory to .notmuchmail. Hope this helps -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39

[BUG] Putting tags=; into .notmuch-config will create empty tags

2014-02-22 Thread Rob Browning
=batch-tag 'tag:' | perl -pe 's/^\+ //' \ | notmuch restore --format=batch-tag And note that you have to use restore, notmuch tag --batch doesn't appear to accept - as a tag, even though dump will produce + . Hope this helps -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011

[PATCH 0/5] lib: make folder: prefix literal

2014-02-04 Thread Rob Browning
the user has legitimate folders named cur and new, but perhaps that'll just end up a "don't do that then" FAQ... -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Re: [PATCH 0/5] lib: make folder: prefix literal

2014-02-04 Thread Rob Browning
, the user has legitimate folders named cur and new, but perhaps that'll just end up a don't do that then FAQ... -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377

[PATCH 0/5] lib: make folder: prefix literal

2014-01-31 Thread Rob Browning
t more friendly term(s). -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

[PATCH 0/5] lib: make folder: prefix literal

2014-01-31 Thread Rob Browning
with glob patterns for paths, so why not simply > adopt this? rsync too. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Re: [PATCH 0/5] lib: make folder: prefix literal

2014-01-31 Thread Rob Browning
for paths, so why not simply adopt this? rsync too. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

[PATCH 2/5] test: fix insert folder: searches

2014-01-25 Thread Rob Browning
strongly about any of this. I'll be happy with any reasonable way to specify specific "folders" in a Maildir++ tree (with or without cur/new unification, etc.). Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597

Re: [PATCH 2/5] test: fix insert folder: searches

2014-01-25 Thread Rob Browning
reasonable way to specify specific folders in a Maildir++ tree (with or without cur/new unification, etc.). Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377

Build system

2011-03-10 Thread Rob Browning
epend on GNU coreutils, would "cp -rl ..." work? -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

[Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Rob Browning
question at least, seemed to just be asking for a visual indicator that a message has encrypted or signed bits. So I wondered if that might be accomplished without actual tags. Just curious. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0

Re: [Review] Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-28 Thread Rob Browning
? The original question at least, seemed to just be asking for a visual indicator that a message has encrypted or signed bits. So I wondered if that might be accomplished without actual tags. Just curious. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D

Hiding HTML mime-parts and/or scrubbing (gmail's) HTML-based citation

2011-02-22 Thread Rob Browning
(setq mm-discouraged-alternatives '("text/html" "text/richtext") mm-automatic-display (remove "text/html" mm-automatic-display)) Though it's been so long since I set that up, I can't describe exactly what it does off the top of my head, but I origin

Re: Hiding HTML mime-parts and/or scrubbing (gmail's) HTML-based citation

2011-02-22 Thread Rob Browning
(remove text/html mm-automatic-display)) Though it's been so long since I set that up, I can't describe exactly what it does off the top of my head, but I originally set it up to help quash the display of html alternatives. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD

Folder search semantics

2011-02-20 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning writes: > And personally, I think I'd prefer that folder: be anchored by default, > so that folder:work means "the top-level folder named work", but it's > not a big deal to me as long as there's a fairly easy way to specify > exactly what I want. Oh, and in

Folder search semantics

2011-02-20 Thread Rob Browning
e handled in the underlying storage. So depending on the backend, foo/bar could refer to "Maildir/foo/bar" or "Maildir/.foo.bar". And personally, I think I'd prefer that folder: be anchored by default, so that folder:work means "the top-level folder named work

RFC: Dovecot locking

2011-02-20 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning writes: > It looks like dovecot's interval is 10 seconds, so for this to work > right, notmuch will need to call lockfile_touch() more often than that. > > /* How often to touch the uidlist lock file when it's locked. > This is done both when using KEEP_LOCKE

RFC: Dovecot locking

2011-02-20 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning writes: > Rob Browning writes: > >> This is an unfinished patch to handle Dovecot locking, which is useful >> if we'd like to support running notmuch directly on a Dovecot Maildir: >> >> http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir#Locking

Re: Folder search semantics

2011-02-20 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes: And personally, I think I'd prefer that folder: be anchored by default, so that folder:work means the top-level folder named work, but it's not a big deal to me as long as there's a fairly easy way to specify exactly what I want. Oh, and in part

RFC: Dovecot locking

2011-02-18 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning writes: > This is an unfinished patch to handle Dovecot locking, which is useful > if we'd like to support running notmuch directly on a Dovecot Maildir: > > http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/Maildir#Locking > > For now, I'm interested in gen

RFC: Dovecot locking

2011-02-16 Thread Rob Browning
ail/notmuch/attachments/20110216/880ef3f6/attachment.diff> -- next part -- -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

RFC: Dovecot locking

2011-02-16 Thread Rob Browning
) { +fprintf (stderr, Unable to unlock %s: %s\n, + dovecot_lock, strerror (errno)); +status = NOTMUCH_STATUS_FILE_ERROR; +} +} + if (err) continue; -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG

[PATCH] Return error status from notmuch_message_tags_to_maildir_flags().

2011-02-15 Thread Rob Browning
Signed-off-by: Rob Browning --- lib/message.cc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/message.cc b/lib/message.cc index 0590f76..979fad5 100644 --- a/lib/message.cc +++ b/lib/message.cc @@ -1252,7 +1252,7 @@ notmuch_message_tags_to_maildir_flags

[PATCH] *** SUBJECT HERE ***

2011-02-15 Thread Rob Browning
The function notmuch_message_tags_to_maildir_flags() unconditionally returns NOTMUCH_STATUS_SUCCESS, but it looks like it should probably return status. Rob Browning (1): Return error status from notmuch_message_tags_to_maildir_flags(). lib/message.cc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions

[PATCH] Return error status from notmuch_message_tags_to_maildir_flags().

2011-02-14 Thread Rob Browning
Signed-off-by: Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org --- lib/message.cc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/message.cc b/lib/message.cc index 0590f76..979fad5 100644 --- a/lib/message.cc +++ b/lib/message.cc @@ -1252,7 +1252,7

[PATCH] *** SUBJECT HERE ***

2011-02-14 Thread Rob Browning
The function notmuch_message_tags_to_maildir_flags() unconditionally returns NOTMUCH_STATUS_SUCCESS, but it looks like it should probably return status. Rob Browning (1): Return error status from notmuch_message_tags_to_maildir_flags(). lib/message.cc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions

Spam and mailing list filtering?

2011-02-10 Thread Rob Browning
I can filter mailing list stuff more accurately Also note that if you're already filtering via procmail or similar, I believe you should be able to use notmuch-deliver to add tags based on the headers it finds. Alternately, if you already deliver all spam to a particular folder, the new "f

Re: Spam and mailing list filtering?

2011-02-10 Thread Rob Browning
. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

[PATCH 1/3] new: Do not defer maildir flag synchronization during the first run

2011-01-29 Thread Rob Browning
oblem, too. Did you > make any headway? No, I haven't done anything there yet. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Re: [PATCH 1/3] new: Do not defer maildir flag synchronization during the first run

2011-01-29 Thread Rob Browning
this problem, too. Did you make any headway? No, I haven't done anything there yet. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch

[PATCH] Have to configure and build inside the source directory.

2011-01-28 Thread Rob Browning
I believe the autotools build a tree that matches the srcdir structure and add Makefiles that contain something like this: VPATH = ../../wherever/notmuch/thisdir ... Of course, given that, the build tree doesn't include any source files. FWIW -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debia

Re: [PATCH] Have to configure and build inside the source directory.

2011-01-28 Thread Rob Browning
. For example, I believe the autotools build a tree that matches the srcdir structure and add Makefiles that contain something like this: VPATH = ../../wherever/notmuch/thisdir ... Of course, given that, the build tree doesn't include any source files. FWIW -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org

Folder-based searching

2011-01-18 Thread Rob Browning
often people really want "all folders named misc"? > That will require a little care to get some additional terms indexed to > support the rooting, then the in-development custom query parser to > allow mapping symbols like '^' and '$' to these new symbols. Sounds good

Re: Folder-based searching

2011-01-18 Thread Rob Browning
want all folders named misc? That will require a little care to get some additional terms indexed to support the rooting, then the in-development custom query parser to allow mapping symbols like '^' and '$' to these new symbols. Sounds good. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org

Folder-based searching

2011-01-17 Thread Rob Browning
path semantics? For example, is the path case sensitive or insensitive? Can you say folder:foo/bar, and if so, is the path rooted, or can it match path sub-segments? i.e. which of these, if any, is "folder:foo/bar" like? (.*/)?foo/bar(/.*)? ^foo/bar$ ^foo/bar(/.*)? Th

Re: Folder-based searching

2011-01-17 Thread Rob Browning
are the path semantics? For example, is the path case sensitive or insensitive? Can you say folder:foo/bar, and if so, is the path rooted, or can it match path sub-segments? i.e. which of these, if any, is folder:foo/bar like? (.*/)?foo/bar(/.*)? ^foo/bar$ ^foo/bar(/.*)? Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb

Difference between search and filter

2010-11-26 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning writes: > Though I'm also used to 'f' and 'F' for "followup" commands (as compared > to 'r' and 'R' for reply commands), so I'd have to get used to 'f' as > something else, regardless. Also, is notmuch planning to support both followup and reply? If so, then

Difference between search and filter

2010-11-26 Thread Rob Browning
Though I'm also used to 'f' and 'F' for "followup" commands (as compared to 'r' and 'R' for reply commands), so I'd have to get used to 'f' as something else, regardless. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Re: Difference between search and filter

2010-11-26 Thread Rob Browning
occasionally. Though I'm also used to 'f' and 'F' for followup commands (as compared to 'r' and 'R' for reply commands), so I'd have to get used to 'f' as something else, regardless. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Re: Difference between search and filter

2010-11-26 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes: Though I'm also used to 'f' and 'F' for followup commands (as compared to 'r' and 'R' for reply commands), so I'd have to get used to 'f' as something else, regardless. Also, is notmuch planning to support both followup and reply? If so

C coding conventions for notmuch

2010-11-23 Thread Rob Browning
tyle in general, so perhaps: ((c-mode . ((c-file-style "linux") (indent-tabs-mode . t) (tab-width . 8) (c-basic-offset . 4 -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Re: C coding conventions for notmuch

2010-11-23 Thread Rob Browning
in general, so perhaps: ((c-mode . ((c-file-style linux) (indent-tabs-mode . t) (tab-width . 8) (c-basic-offset . 4 -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

[notmuch] [PATCH] compatibility with emacs22

2010-11-16 Thread Rob Browning
Carl Worth writes: > But perhaps getting access to that single, entire file will be easier > than getting access to these two little functions. Assuming the current emacs-23 version will work: wget -O json.el \ 'http://repo.or.cz/w/emacs.git/blob_plain/emacs-23:/lisp/json.el' -

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] compatibility with emacs22

2010-11-16 Thread Rob Browning
/json.el' -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Notmuch Ruby bindings

2010-11-09 Thread Rob Browning
start reply to author R - start reply to author, including a copy of the original f - start reply to all F - start reply to all, including a copy of the original I believe f/F probably respect Mail-Followup-To. FWIW -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD

Re: Notmuch Ruby bindings

2010-11-09 Thread Rob Browning
- start reply to author, including a copy of the original f - start reply to all F - start reply to all, including a copy of the original I believe f/F probably respect Mail-Followup-To. FWIW -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0

RFC: [PATCH] emacs: Improve the definition and use of `notmuch-fcc-dirs'.

2010-11-04 Thread Rob Browning
e year: (setq gnus-message-archive-group '((list (concat "all-" (format-time-string "%Y") That tells gnus that the archive group should be "all-". (Section 5.5 in "info gnus" has all the gory details if you want to see what's been done t

Re: RFC: [PATCH] emacs: Improve the definition and use of `notmuch-fcc-dirs'.

2010-11-04 Thread Rob Browning
on the year: (setq gnus-message-archive-group '((list (concat all- (format-time-string %Y) That tells gnus that the archive group should be all-. (Section 5.5 in info gnus has all the gory details if you want to see what's been done there.) -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org

Adding support for "notmuch new ... PATH"

2010-10-23 Thread Rob Browning
? 2) Does add_files_recursive() assume it always sees all paths? i.e. is it safe to call it with just a sub-directory of the mail directory? I haven't finished investigating the code, but some bits made me wonder. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG

Adding support for notmuch new ... PATH

2010-10-23 Thread Rob Browning
? 2) Does add_files_recursive() assume it always sees all paths? i.e. is it safe to call it with just a sub-directory of the mail directory? I haven't finished investigating the code, but some bits made me wonder. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG

Re: First draft of logging functionality.

2010-10-12 Thread Rob Browning
this helps -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Would a more sophisticated notmuch-fcc-dirs be acceptable?

2010-09-26 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning writes: > I'd also like to fcc to a directory outside of message-directory At least for this part, one possiblity would be to just use the chosen directory literally (don't prepend message-directory) whenever it's an absolute path according to file-name-absolute-p. For exam

Would a more sophisticated notmuch-fcc-dirs be acceptable?

2010-09-26 Thread Rob Browning
t sometimes it might be useful to fcc to more than one location. If I have time to work on it, would patches for this sort of thing be interesting? Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

notmuchsync: handling of the deleted tag

2010-09-21 Thread Rob Browning
Sebastian Spaeth writes: > On 2010-09-21, Rob Browning wrote: >> Conceptually what I'd like for it to do, is reference count -- only mark >> the message deleted if every occurrence (across all maildirs) is marked >> trashed (T). > > Right, but that is trickier than

Re: notmuchsync: handling of the deleted tag

2010-09-21 Thread Rob Browning
Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de writes: On 2010-09-21, Rob Browning wrote: Conceptually what I'd like for it to do, is reference count -- only mark the message deleted if every occurrence (across all maildirs) is marked trashed (T). Right, but that is trickier than might appear

notmuchsync: handling of the deleted tag

2010-09-20 Thread Rob Browning
ve. > If notmuch gave me at least all filenames that are associated with a > mail id, I could introduce a command line option "--prune --safe" which would > Sebastian Looks like you got cut off there. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-1

Re: notmuchsync: handling of the deleted tag

2010-09-20 Thread Rob Browning
gave me at least all filenames that are associated with a mail id, I could introduce a command line option --prune --safe which would Sebastian Looks like you got cut off there. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8

[notmuch] loss of duplicate messages

2010-09-15 Thread Rob Browning
perhaps via an --include-duplicates argument to search/show/count, etc. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Re: [notmuch] loss of duplicate messages

2010-09-15 Thread Rob Browning
argument to search/show/count, etc. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo

[PATCH] Move notmuch-fcc-header-setup to message-header-setup-hook.

2010-09-12 Thread Rob Browning
Call notmuch-fcc-header-setup from message-header-setup-hook rather than message-send-hook. This allows you to see what's going to happen, and to make manual adjustments if desired. Gnus does something similar. Signed-off-by: Rob Browning --- emacs/notmuch-maildir-fcc.el |2 +- 1 files

[PATCH] Move notmuch-fcc-header-setup to message-header-setup-hook.

2010-09-12 Thread Rob Browning
Here's a small patch to move notmuch-fcc-header-setup from message-send-hook to message-header-setup-hook. This is nice because it allows you to see what's going to happen and make adjustments if you like. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD

Strings vs symbols in notmuch-search-result-format

2010-09-11 Thread Rob Browning
for strings, but if not, the latter is more idiomatic, and a bit more efficient too (comparisons will just be pointer compares (via assq) rather than something like a strcmp (assoc)). In any case, I imagine this might not be something you'd want to change at this point -- I'm just trying to make sure

Mail summary comparison with Gnus

2010-09-11 Thread Rob Browning
f. krafft, Carl Worth (f//notmuch unread) I didn't seem to work but I thought I'd check in case I wasn't configuring it correctly. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Mail summary comparison with Gnus

2010-09-11 Thread Rob Browning
djusted in its info pages (c.f. info gnus "3.9 Threading...")). Hope this is useful -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Mail summary comparison with Gnus

2010-09-11 Thread Rob Browning
gnus 3.9 Threading...)). Hope this is useful -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman

Re: Mail summary comparison with Gnus

2010-09-11 Thread Rob Browning
f. krafft, Carl Worth (f//notmuch unread) I didn't seem to work but I thought I'd check in case I wasn't configuring it correctly. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Xapian exceptions "Key too long" during notmuch new

2010-09-07 Thread Rob Browning
ine. Thanks for the help. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Re: Xapian exceptions Key too long during notmuch new

2010-09-07 Thread Rob Browning
seems fine. Thanks for the help. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Xapian exceptions "Key too long" during notmuch new

2010-09-06 Thread Rob Browning
-- next part -- -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Xapian exceptions "Key too long" during notmuch new

2010-09-06 Thread Rob Browning
ose -o ~/new-notmuch-index or similar. Thanks for the help -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Xapian exceptions "Key too long" during notmuch new

2010-09-06 Thread Rob Browning
processing. Processed 1373303 total files in 10h 47m 31s (35 files/sec.). Added 1292042 new messages to the database. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Xapian exceptions Key too long during notmuch new

2010-09-06 Thread Rob Browning
processing. Processed 1373303 total files in 10h 47m 31s (35 files/sec.). Added 1292042 new messages to the database. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4

Re: Xapian exceptions Key too long during notmuch new

2010-09-06 Thread Rob Browning
--verbose -o ~/new-notmuch-index or similar. Thanks for the help -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http

Re: Xapian exceptions Key too long during notmuch new

2010-09-06 Thread Rob Browning
/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh-- -- Rob Browning