On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:23:40 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> Well, it is fatal in the sense that it makes that function useless. But
> it's not as bad as it is currently unused.
Right. I didn't want to push something out with a known-broken function.
I would have rather the patch just remove
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:20:27 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:26:47 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> > > It then checks the unread status in order to decide whether to proceed
> > > to the next again. So with your patch notmuch-show-next-unread-message
> > > will skip through
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:20:27 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:26:47 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
It then checks the unread status in order to decide whether to proceed
to the next again. So with your patch
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:26:47 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:33:11 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" SSpaeth.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:54:16 -0500, Jameson Rollins > finestructure.net> wrote:
> > > This patch is intended to greatly simplify the handling of the
> > >
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:33:11 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:54:16 -0500, Jameson Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > This patch is intended to greatly simplify the handling of the
> > "unread" tag in the emacs UI. This patch adds a new function
> >
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:33:11 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:54:16 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
This patch is intended to greatly simplify the handling of the
unread tag in the emacs UI. This patch adds a new function
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:26:47 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:33:11 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:54:16 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
This patch is intended to greatly simplify the
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:54:16 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> This patch is intended to greatly simplify the handling of the
> "unread" tag in the emacs UI. This patch adds a new function
> 'notmuch-show-mark-read', that removes the "unread" tag in
> notmuch-show-mode. This function is then
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:33:11 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> I've been using this for quite some time now and I am pretty happy with
> it. However, there is a problem with this approach as this renders the
> function notmuch-show-next-unread-message useless.
>
> This proceeds to the next
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:54:16 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
This patch is intended to greatly simplify the handling of the
unread tag in the emacs UI. This patch adds a new function
'notmuch-show-mark-read', that removes the unread tag in
notmuch-show-mode. This
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:33:11 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
I've been using this for quite some time now and I am pretty happy with
it. However, there is a problem with this approach as this renders the
function notmuch-show-next-unread-message useless.
This proceeds
This patch is intended to greatly simplify the handling of the
unread tag in the emacs UI. This patch adds a new function
'notmuch-show-mark-read', that removes the unread tag in
notmuch-show-mode. This function is then executed as a
notmuch-show-hook, and by notmuch-show-next-message. All of
12 matches
Mail list logo
