{-- Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:49:58 -0800: Carl wrote: --}
Carl> So when there are quick and easy things, (like calling an
Carl> existing function on an 'f' binding like above), that totally
Carl> makes sense to do. We can look at things like that as interim
Carl> solutions until the C program
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:32:00 -0800, Keith Amidon
wrote:
> What are your thoughts generally about integration with things like
> message mode vs. implementing more into the C program? If you think the
> message-mode enhancements will have a life I'll spend some time on this
> and getting the
{-- Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:15:15 -0800: Carl wrote: --}
Carl> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:30:11 -0800, camalot at picnicpark.org wrote:
>> From: Keith Amidon
>> Sometimes forwarding a message is preferable to replying and
>> modifying the set of recipients. This commit provides that ability
{-- Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:49:58 -0800: Carl cwo...@cworth.org wrote: --}
Carl So when there are quick and easy things, (like calling an
Carl existing function on an 'f' binding like above), that totally
Carl makes sense to do. We can look at things like that as interim
Carl solutions until
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:30:11 -0800, camalot at picnicpark.org wrote:
> From: Keith Amidon
>
> Sometimes forwarding a message is preferable to replying and modifying
> the set of recipients. This commit provides that ability using the
> message-forward function.
This is nice functionality---we
