On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:25:18 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> I want it to work the same way as you expected. It seems it would be
> necessary
> to modify notmuch_database_remove_message() so that it changes folder term if
> it detects rename.
On a tangetial issue: It would help if notmuch were
> /media/mail/mail
> ??? cur
> ? ??? 1265050537.H891745P1231.samir.ibcsolutions.de:2,S
> ? ??? 1265050572.H419259P1443.samir.ibcsolutions.de:2,S
> ? ??? 1265050598.H121639P1634.samir.ibcsolutions.de:2,S
> ? ??? 1265050617.H309805P1774.samir.ibcsolutions.de:2,S
> ? ???
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:25:18 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
I want it to work the same way as you expected. It seems it would be
necessary
to modify notmuch_database_remove_message() so that it changes folder term if
it detects rename.
On a tangetial issue: It would help if
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 22:31:38 micah anderson wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:22:29 -0500, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> > I'm starting to think that maybe the folder: field is not the right way
> > to do this, though. What if a message moves?
>
> The easiest way to answer this question is to
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 18:48:25 Arvid Picciani wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:01:08 +0100, Michal Sojka
>
> wrote:
> > Stores the folder (directory name) of the message in the database as a
> > term with folder prefix.
Hi,
I've just made several experiments. I tested both Maildir layout
It's all the dots fault. it works just fine with folders not beginning
with .
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:22:29 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> I'm going back to my original
> suggestion, which was that the configuration should state tag that
> should be added for messages in certain folders.
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:25:18 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 February 2010 22:31:38 micah anderson wrote:
> > The easiest way to answer this question is to try it. I did that, and
> > things didn't work as expected. I expected that once the message was
> > moved to a different folder,
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:22:29 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> I'm starting to think that maybe the folder: field is not the right way
> to do this, though. What if a message moves?
The easiest way to answer this question is to try it. I did that, and
things didn't work as expected. I expected
Stores the folder (directory name) of the message in the database as a
term with folder prefix.
This patch was originally sent by Andreas Kl?ckner. The differences
from the original patch are:
- Folder name is taken from strings generated during travesal. It no
longer uses glib nor it allocates
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:48:25 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:01:08 +0100, Michal Sojka
> wrote:
> unfortunately it doesnt do anything here :/
> i rebuilt the entire index, but no folder: field is added.
> can anyone who got it working tell me their directory layout?
> mine
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:20:02 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> I just gave it a try, though, and it seemed to be behaving a little
> strangely. I currently have two subdirectories, "inbox" and "sent".
> However, new mail to either directory was showing up under the search:
>
> notmuch search
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:01:08 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> Stores the folder (directory name) of the message in the database as a
> term with folder prefix.
>
> This patch was originally sent by Andreas Kl?ckner. The differences
> from the original patch are:
> - Folder name is taken from strings
Stores the folder (directory name) of the message in the database as a
term with folder prefix.
This patch was originally sent by Andreas Klöckner. The differences
from the original patch are:
- Folder name is taken from strings generated during travesal. It no
longer uses glib nor it allocates
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:01:08 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
Stores the folder (directory name) of the message in the database as a
term with folder prefix.
This patch was originally sent by Andreas Klöckner. The differences
from the original patch are:
- Folder name is taken
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:20:02 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
I just gave it a try, though, and it seemed to be behaving a little
strangely. I currently have two subdirectories, inbox and sent.
However, new mail to either directory was showing up under the search:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:01:08 +0100, Michal Sojkasojk...@fel.cvut.cz
wrote:
Stores the folder (directory name) of the message in the database as a
term with folder prefix.
unfortunately it doesnt do anything here :/
i rebuilt the entire index, but no folder: field is added.
can anyone who got
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:48:25 +0100, Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:01:08 +0100, Michal Sojkasojk...@fel.cvut.cz
wrote:
unfortunately it doesnt do anything here :/
i rebuilt the entire index, but no folder: field is added.
can anyone who got it working tell me
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 18:48:25 Arvid Picciani wrote:
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:01:08 +0100, Michal Sojkasojk...@fel.cvut.cz
wrote:
Stores the folder (directory name) of the message in the database as a
term with folder prefix.
Hi,
I've just made several experiments. I tested both
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 22:31:38 micah anderson wrote:
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:22:29 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
I'm starting to think that maybe the folder: field is not the right way
to do this, though. What if a message moves?
The easiest way to answer
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:25:18 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 22:31:38 micah anderson wrote:
The easiest way to answer this question is to try it. I did that, and
things didn't work as expected. I expected that once the message was
moved to a
/media/mail/mail
├── cur
│ ├── 1265050537.H891745P1231.samir.ibcsolutions.de:2,S
│ ├── 1265050572.H419259P1443.samir.ibcsolutions.de:2,S
│ ├── 1265050598.H121639P1634.samir.ibcsolutions.de:2,S
│ ├── 1265050617.H309805P1774.samir.ibcsolutions.de:2,S
│ ├──
21 matches
Mail list logo
