On Saturday 06 of February 2010 22:45:32 Carl Worth wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 11:40:18 +0100, Michal Sojka
> wrote:
> > It is straightforward to convert your current test script to Git's
> > framework. If you are interested I'll do it.
>
> Yes, I'd be quite interested in seeing that. Thanks
On Saturday 06 of February 2010 22:45:32 Carl Worth wrote:
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 11:40:18 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
It is straightforward to convert your current test script to Git's
framework. If you are interested I'll do it.
Yes, I'd be quite interested in seeing that.
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 11:40:18 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> I've just looked at your notmuch-test commits. Did you noticed my patches
> which port Git's test framework for use with notmuch?
Hi Michal,
Ah, my mistake!
That's what I get for working through my backlog chronologically. ;-)
> That
On Friday 05 of February 2010 19:59:12 Carl Worth wrote:
> Of course, I also pushed a set of tests to the test suite for this, (and
> some new "notmuch search" tests while I was at it).
Hi Carl,
I've just looked at your notmuch-test commits. Did you noticed my patches
which port Git's test
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 11:40:18 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
I've just looked at your notmuch-test commits. Did you noticed my patches
which port Git's test framework for use with notmuch?
Hi Michal,
Ah, my mistake!
That's what I get for working through my backlog
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:16:21 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> Clearly, some experimenting is needed. Dominik, if you can share the
> large file, (with either me alone or with the whole list), a pointer to
> where we could download it would be appreciated.
Dominik replied to me privately and described
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:46:54 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> So perhaps the new configuration option we want is a limit on message
> size? Rather than ignoring large files entirely, notmuch could just stop
> indexing messages past the configured limit?
Having just written that, I don't think it's
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:39:57 +0100, Dominik Epple wrote:
> So the problem stems indeed from too many too large files being
> present. (I actually found some being as large as 40M, not just 2.4M,
> as written in previous mails.)
That's very good to know.
And I'm glad you at least have things
Hello,
I repeated the procedure (mb2md, notmuch new), but before, I saved all
those large emails with backup logs into a separate folder which i
deleted before "notmuch new". Then, "notmoch new" works as expected.
So the problem stems indeed from too many too large files being
present. (I
Hi,
2009/11/20 Carl Worth :
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:56:50 +0100, Dominik Epple googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Is there a problem with the number of my mails? I currently have over
>> 40.000 Mails... they live currently in mbox files, I created a Maildir
>> with mb2md-3.20.pl.
>
> I'm suspecting that
Hi,
Thanks for your help. Here is the information you requested:
2009/11/20 Carl Worth :
> I'm curious how big your .notmuch directory ended up after this
> operation. (And how that compares in size to the total size of your
> collection of mail.)
I guess you mean these directories:
$ du -sh
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:56:50 +0100, Dominik Epple wrote:
> Is there a problem with the number of my mails? I currently have over
> 40.000 Mails... they live currently in mbox files, I created a Maildir
> with mb2md-3.20.pl.
I'm suspecting that you have some big files in there, (such as indexes
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:56:50 +0100, Dominik Epple wrote:
> I am strongly interested in giving notmuch a try.
Welcome to notmuch, Dominik! I'm sorry your initial attempt to use it
hasn't been quite as smooth as we might like.
> But I fail setting
Hi,
I am strongly interested in giving notmuch a try. But I fail setting
it up. The problem is that during "notmuch new", memory consumption
and system load increases to values that make my system unusable. I
then killed "notmuch new" at a memory consumption of 2.7G and at a
system load of 7.
14 matches
Mail list logo
