On 4/12/10 10:18 PM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
>
> Twas brillig at 15:58:10 12.04.2010 UTC+02 when tom at dbservice.com did gyre
> and gimble:
>
> TC> In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you
> introduced
> TC> strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec (notmuc
Twas brillig at 15:58:10 12.04.2010 UTC+02 when tom at dbservice.com did gyre
and gimble:
TC> In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you
introduced
TC> strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec (notmuch reply: Use strstr
TC> instead of strcasestr for portabili
--- 2010ko Apirilak 12an, Tomas Carnecky-ek idatzi zuen:
>
> Adding that function to compat/ probably is the way to go, but the whole
> compat mechanism doesn't work here. It's like if compat/Makefile.local was
> not included in the top-level makefile, notmuch_compat_srcs is empty
> there. Any ide
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:04:39 +0200, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> On 4/12/10 10:18 PM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> >
> > Twas brillig at 15:58:10 12.04.2010 UTC+02 when t...@dbservice.com did gyre
> > and gimble:
> >
> > TC> In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06)
> > you int
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:04:39 +0200, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> On 4/12/10 10:18 PM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> >
> > Twas brillig at 15:58:10 12.04.2010 UTC+02 when tom at dbservice.com did
> > gyre and gimble:
> >
> > TC> In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06)
> > you i
--- 2010ko Apirilak 12an, Tomas Carnecky-ek idatzi zuen:
>
> Adding that function to compat/ probably is the way to go, but the whole
> compat mechanism doesn't work here. It's like if compat/Makefile.local was
> not included in the top-level makefile, notmuch_compat_srcs is empty
> there. Any ide
On 4/12/10 10:18 PM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
Twas brillig at 15:58:10 12.04.2010 UTC+02 when t...@dbservice.com did gyre and
gimble:
TC> In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you
introduced
TC> strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec (notmuch reply: Use
In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you
introduced strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec (notmuch
reply: Use strstr instead of strcasestr for portability., 2010-02-04).
Is strcasestr really necessary there or can it be replaced with strstr?
tom
Twas brillig at 15:58:10 12.04.2010 UTC+02 when t...@dbservice.com did gyre and
gimble:
TC> In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you
introduced
TC> strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec (notmuch reply: Use strstr
TC> instead of strcasestr for portability
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:58:10 +0200, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you
> introduced strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec (notmuch
> reply: Use strstr instead of strcasestr for portability., 2010-02-04).
>
> Is strcasestr reall
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:58:10 +0200, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you
> introduced strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec (notmuch
> reply: Use strstr instead of strcasestr for portability., 2010-02-04).
>
> Is strcasestr reall
In 4fd9ea0 (guess From address from Received headers, 2010-04-06) you
introduced strcasestr, which is not portable, see 82e47ec (notmuch
reply: Use strstr instead of strcasestr for portability., 2010-02-04).
Is strcasestr really necessary there or can it be replaced with strstr?
tom
_
12 matches
Mail list logo