On Sat, May 03 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> First, are there people out there who do not use a collection of maildir
> directories, with all mail in cur and new?
o/ I completely abandoned the usage of separate mail "folders" since I
started using notmuch. All my mail
On Sat, May 03 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
First, are there people out there who do not use a collection of maildir
directories, with all mail in cur and new?
o/ I completely abandoned the usage of separate mail folders since I
started using notmuch. All my mail now
> The trick here is that it's easy to miss people who are happy with
> current functionality. Adding functionality to address newly-identified
> use cases makes a lot of sense. But removing functionality runs the risk
> of only discovering that people were relying on it after the fact,
> (Which
The trick here is that it's easy to miss people who are happy with
current functionality. Adding functionality to address newly-identified
use cases makes a lot of sense. But removing functionality runs the risk
of only discovering that people were relying on it after the fact,
(Which seems
On Mon, 05 May 2014, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Hi Carl -
>
> On Tue, 06 May 2014, Carl Worth wrote:
>> dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu writes:
>>> However, currently it seems strange that there are *two* different
>>> search terms (folder and path), and that neither one lets you search for
Hi Carl -
On Tue, 06 May 2014, Carl Worth wrote:
> dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu writes:
>> However, currently it seems strange that there are *two* different
>> search terms (folder and path), and that neither one lets you search for
>> a portion of your folder name.
>
> For what
On Mon, 05 May 2014, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
Hi Carl -
On Tue, 06 May 2014, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu writes:
However, currently it seems strange that there are *two* different
search terms (folder and path), and that neither one
dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu writes:
First, thanks for the response. The responsiveness and friendliness of
the notmuch mailing list goes a long way towards compensating for any
missing features / customizability one might want.
I'm delighted to hear that the notmuch community
Hi Carl -
On Tue, 06 May 2014, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu writes:
However, currently it seems strange that there are *two* different
search terms (folder and path), and that neither one lets you search for
a portion of your folder name.
For
Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes:
The discussions about this were lengthy and tedious, and I was glad we
eventually reached some consensus about what we wanted.
This much I do understand. And I apologize if I seem to be raising anew
issues that should finally be behind us.
Meanwhile, the
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
>
>>> All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
>>> match just the "mail.class" part without the year? How very
>>> distressing. Ugh.
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am not quite sure
Hi
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
>
>>> All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
>>> match just the "mail.class" part without the year? How very
>>> distressing. Ugh.
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am not quite
Jani Nikula writes:
> It's not going to help you, but I'll mention a few of the issues the old
> folder: search had, which we also had complaints about, and which would
> have been quite hard to fix while preserving the behaviour you want. In
> short, we considered the old folder: search broken.
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Jani Nikula writes:
>
>> On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm using a pretty standard maildir++ layout. For example, underneath
>>> my database.path I have a bunch of mail in
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:57:49PM -0700, dm-list-email-notmuch at
scs.stanford.edu wrote:
>
> Worse, because of my poor performance, I was hoping to segregate
> messages by year. So it would be:
>
> 2013/.mail.class
> 2013/.mail.voicemail
> 2014/.mail.class
> 2014/.mail.voicemail
>
>
Hello David,
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:16:07PM -0700, David Mazieres expires 2014-07-31 PDT
wrote:
> Mark Walters writes:
> >
> > Before checking other things: have you run notmuch new? That's needed to
> > update the database. It is an irreversible update so notmuch-0.17 will
> > not work
On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> Hey, I'm playing around with the head of the git repository
> (bc64cdce289d84be2550c4fccb1f008d15eaeb0e) to try to figure out how the
> new folder: prefixes work, as folders are a critical part of how I
> organize my mail.
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes:
On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
I'm using a pretty standard maildir++ layout. For example, underneath
my database.path I have a bunch of mail in
Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com writes:
All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
match just the mail.class part without the year? How very
distressing. Ugh.
Hi
I am not quite sure what you are meaning by hierarchically group
messages. Searching for
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com writes:
All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
match just the mail.class part without the year? How very
distressing. Ugh.
Hi
I am not quite sure
Hi
On Sat, 03 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com writes:
All the way back. Now you are saying there will be no convenient way to
match just the mail.class part without the year? How very
distressing. Ugh.
Hi
I am not quite
Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes:
It's not going to help you, but I'll mention a few of the issues the old
folder: search had, which we also had complaints about, and which would
have been quite hard to fix while preserving the behaviour you want. In
short, we considered the old folder:
Jani Nikula writes:
> On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu wrote:
>>
>> I'm using a pretty standard maildir++ layout. For example, underneath
>> my database.path I have a bunch of mail in directories such as:
>>
>> .INBOX.Main/{new,cur}
>> .mail.class/{new,cur}
Hi
Before checking other things: have you run notmuch new? That's needed to
update the database. It is an irreversible update so notmuch-0.17 will
not work with the updated database.
The update should save a dump of the tags before updating but you might
want to do that manually too (and maybe
Mark Walters writes:
> Hi
>
> Before checking other things: have you run notmuch new? That's needed to
> update the database. It is an irreversible update so notmuch-0.17 will
> not work with the updated database.
No, I haven't. Okay, so that must be it. Sorry for bothering people.
The
Hey, I'm playing around with the head of the git repository
(bc64cdce289d84be2550c4fccb1f008d15eaeb0e) to try to figure out how the
new folder: prefixes work, as folders are a critical part of how I
organize my mail. (Since tags are not hierarchical, folders are the
best way for me to group mail
Hey, I'm playing around with the head of the git repository
(bc64cdce289d84be2550c4fccb1f008d15eaeb0e) to try to figure out how the
new folder: prefixes work, as folders are a critical part of how I
organize my mail. (Since tags are not hierarchical, folders are the
best way for me to group mail
On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
Hey, I'm playing around with the head of the git repository
(bc64cdce289d84be2550c4fccb1f008d15eaeb0e) to try to figure out how the
new folder: prefixes work, as folders are a critical part of how I
organize my mail. (Since
Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com writes:
Hi
Before checking other things: have you run notmuch new? That's needed to
update the database. It is an irreversible update so notmuch-0.17 will
not work with the updated database.
No, I haven't. Okay, so that must be it. Sorry for
Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org writes:
On Fri, 02 May 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
I'm using a pretty standard maildir++ layout. For example, underneath
my database.path I have a bunch of mail in directories such as:
.INBOX.Main/{new,cur}
.mail.class/{new,cur}
Hello David,
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:16:07PM -0700, David Mazieres expires 2014-07-31 PDT
wrote:
Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com writes:
Before checking other things: have you run notmuch new? That's needed to
update the database. It is an irreversible update so notmuch-0.17
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:57:49PM -0700,
dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
Worse, because of my poor performance, I was hoping to segregate
messages by year. So it would be:
2013/.mail.class
2013/.mail.voicemail
2014/.mail.class
2014/.mail.voicemail
All the way
32 matches
Mail list logo
