{-- Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:57:01 -0800: Carl wrote: --}
Carl> First, I'm not sure whether we need two different variations of
Carl> what's effectively the same operation here ("save all
Carl> attachments").
Yes, I agree it is an ugly solution. Thanks for not letting me get away
with it.
t's helpful,
-Carl
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091211/afdeec21/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 14:11 +0800 Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> While playing with notmuch I am still using evolution to read the email
> in the same MailDir that is being indexed / processed by notmuch. With
> the result that lots of emails can not be found in notmuch if they have
I have the similar
ail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091211/0666e254/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 10:44 +0100, Marten Veldthuis wrote:
> Excerpts from Dirk Hohndel's message of Fri Dec 11 07:11:04 +0100 2009:
> > Is there a workaround?
>
> For now, you can do
>
> notmuch dump somefile
> mv Mail/.notmuch /tmp
> notmuch new
> notmuch restore somefile
>
> Which
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:19:38 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote:
> From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
>
> This patch helps in customizing search result display
> similar to mutt's index_format. The customization is done
> by defining an alist as below
>
> (setq notmuch-search-result-format '(("date" . "%s ")
On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:07:54 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:16:44 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
> >
> > This patch add --format=sender-only option.
>
> I like the idea here, (and agree that an 'R' keybinding would be great).
Excerpts from Dirk Hohndel's message of Fri Dec 11 07:11:04 +0100 2009:
> Is there a workaround?
For now, you can do
notmuch dump somefile
mv Mail/.notmuch /tmp
notmuch new
notmuch restore somefile
Which will re-index all your mail, and restore your tags, as far as the
messages are
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 22:11 -0800, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> While playing with notmuch I am still using evolution to read the email
> in the same MailDir that is being indexed / processed by notmuch. With
> the result that lots of emails can not be found in notmuch if they have
> been marked as read
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:24:02 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> In the meantime, if I could get my hands on a message that triggers this
> bug, that would be useful. (Here's a case where it would be nice to have
> the "notmuch search --output=maildir" command I had talked about so that
> we could export
non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091211/5545a2e7/attachment.pgp>
On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:10:13 -0800, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote:
I'm in the search results window in Emacs, on an LKML thread with 140+
messages. I hit return to view this thread - Emacs consumes 100% CPU
but even after waiting 3 minutes it doesn't display the result (this is
on a
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:24:02 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
In the meantime, if I could get my hands on a message that triggers this
bug, that would be useful. (Here's a case where it would be nice to have
the notmuch search --output=maildir command I had talked about so that
we
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 10:44 +0100, Marten Veldthuis wrote:
Excerpts from Dirk Hohndel's message of Fri Dec 11 07:11:04 +0100 2009:
Is there a workaround?
For now, you can do
notmuch dump somefile
mv Mail/.notmuch /tmp
notmuch new
notmuch restore somefile
Which will re-index
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:59:59 -0800, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote:
With all due respect... Seriously? That doesn't even qualify as a crazy
hack... this process takes something like 15 minutes for me.
Carl, any idea how when an actual solution to this problem will arrive?
Hard to
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:40:23 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
Which should let you tar these up and you can send them to me privately
and I'll try to replicate and fix the bug.
Thanks for passing on the messages, Dirk. If anyone's curious the
message that triggered the bug is a public
{-- Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:57:01 -0800: Carl cwo...@cworth.org wrote: --}
Carl First, I'm not sure whether we need two different variations of
Carl what's effectively the same operation here (save all
Carl attachments).
Yes, I agree it is an ugly solution. Thanks for not letting me get away
17 matches
Mail list logo
