I've got a few patches available in my notmuch repo:
http://git.pioto.org/gitweb/notmuch.git
The 'noarg-count' branch makes `notmuch count` without any argument
simply return the total number of messages in the database. This seems
like it could be useful.
The 'new-unread' branch makes `notmuc
h for that.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: notmuch_gcc_35.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 951 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100121/ede5d775/attachment.bin>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: notmuch_new_d_type_fix.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1144 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100121/29b03255/attachment.bin>
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:00:46 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth"
wrote:
> As I do like some of the additional patches, I am shoving some of them
> into my "all feature" branch. I make that one available in case you
> want to pull from it. It currently carries:
>
> Jameson Rollins: Simplify "unread" tag h
Dear all,
First of all, many thanks to Carl and others for writing notmuch.
Some folks on IRC were bemoaning message-mode's annoying inability to
save sent-mail to a Maildir using Fcc. I mentioned that I had written a
bit of Maildir elisp code for that purpose a while back, and it was
suggested
I've got a few patches available in my notmuch repo:
http://git.pioto.org/gitweb/notmuch.git
The 'noarg-count' branch makes `notmuch count` without any argument
simply return the total number of messages in the database. This seems
like it could be useful.
The 'new-unread' branch makes `notmuc
I have reason to need GCC 3.5 which doesn't process the unused(x) macro
correctly. This is probably a bug in 3.5, nevertheless the patch is
simple and corrects the build.
GCC 3.5 also does not understand -Wextra but Makefile is bound to change
less frequently, so I did not include a patch for that
A review of notmuch-new.c shows three uses of ->d_type:
Near line 153, in _entries_resemble_maildir() we can simply allow for
DT_UNKNOWN. This would fail if people have MH-style folders which have
three folders called "new" "cur" and "tmp", but that seems unlikely, in
which case the "tmp" folder w
> ...have region selection in search mode also mark messages. And then
> there could also be a message-by-message way if you wanted to mark
> disjoint messages.
Sorry, I'm getting myself confused here. Not messages, *threads*.
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:56:59 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> Notmuch is not to my knowledge capable of tagging a sub-region of a
> message, so in that sense it might not work.
This is only in notmuch-search mode, so it only operates on full
threads.
> Would it be better to use some sort of tag
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:35:34AM -0500, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> Region is emacs-speak for selected area (either click-and-drag or C-SPC
> and then motion commands). Basically, this was meant to be an emacsy-way
> of tagging a bunch of messages in a buffer at once.
I understand what a region is
Dear all,
First of all, many thanks to Carl and others for writing notmuch.
Some folks on IRC were bemoaning message-mode's annoying inability to
save sent-mail to a Maildir using Fcc. I mentioned that I had written a
bit of Maildir elisp code for that purpose a while back, and it was
suggested
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:23:24 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
Hi Jamie,
> Hi, Jesse. Can you explain what exactly a "region" is? It's not
> clear from your log message or the patch itself.
Region is emacs-speak for selected area (either click-and-drag or C-SPC
and then motion commands). Basicall
ize: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100121/57c86d40/attachment.pgp>
e: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100121/554b47b9/attachment.pgp>
> ...have region selection in search mode also mark messages. And then
> there could also be a message-by-message way if you wanted to mark
> disjoint messages.
Sorry, I'm getting myself confused here. Not messages, *threads*.
___
notmuch mailing list
no
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:56:59 -0500, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> Notmuch is not to my knowledge capable of tagging a sub-region of a
> message, so in that sense it might not work.
This is only in notmuch-search mode, so it only operates on full
threads.
> Would it be better to use some sort of ta
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:35:34AM -0500, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> Region is emacs-speak for selected area (either click-and-drag or C-SPC
> and then motion commands). Basically, this was meant to be an emacsy-way
> of tagging a bunch of messages in a buffer at once.
I understand what a region is
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:23:24 -0500, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
Hi Jamie,
> Hi, Jesse. Can you explain what exactly a "region" is? It's not
> clear from your log message or the patch itself.
Region is emacs-speak for selected area (either click-and-drag or C-SPC
and then motion commands). Basical
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:58:10PM -0500, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> This patch adds `-region' versions of the `notmuch-search-' commands to find
> properties. It also splits up `notmuch-add/remove-tags' into both a
> `-thread' and a `-region' version. (This makes us modify
> `notmuch-search-arch
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Asheesh Laroia [2010.01.14.2112 +1300]:
>> Sure. But the MDA doesn't need to do the commit immediately. Since
>> (presumably) we're using Maildir, the MDA on the mail receiving
>> server is going to generate filenames that won't cause conf
Haven't seen my patch pushed or commented on yet. Was it
black-holed, or are people just busy? Thanks much,
Bart
In message you wrote:
> Together with the new support for message deletion (thank
> you!) this patch lets me use notmuch in parallel with MH
> pretty successfully.
Haven't seen my patch pushed or commented on yet. Was it
black-holed, or are people just busy? Thanks much,
Bart
In message you wrote:
> Together with the new support for message deletion (thank
> you!) this patch lets me use notmuch in parallel with MH
> pretty successfully.
This patch adds `-region' versions of the `notmuch-search-' commands to find
properties. It also splits up `notmuch-add/remove-tags' into both a `-thread'
and a `-region' version. (This makes us modify `notmuch-search-archive-thread'
to use the `notmuch-search-remove-tag-thread' function, inst
26 matches
Mail list logo
