On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:02:41 -0800, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> > Can we pass the decrypted text to message mode on a reply?
> Yeah, some folks pointed this out on #notmuch this morning. The
> decryption is only happening in notmuch-show, but we need to do it in
> notmuch-reply as well for the decr
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called "crypto" to my notmuch
> repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed
> and encrypted messages, including emacs UI support. It has been applied
> on top of cworth's
I just love seeing all those yellow signatures. It reminds me to meet
you all in real life to verify your keys :-).
Thanks for implementing this, the whole lot of you. It works really
well.
Sebastian
pgpuhM09gqBWa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
n
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:52:01 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 11:25 AM, micah anderson wrote:
> > 1. I personally think notmuch-show-process-pgpmime should default to
> > true
>
> note that with it set to false, you can still M-RET (instead of RET) on
> an item in the summary w
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
>
> Please test and provide feedback. I would really like to see this
> series merged into the mainline for the next release, if at all
> possible.
I reported some pretty weird experiences yesterday on IRC with replies
not working. It
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:24:38 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins
> wrote:
> > Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called "crypto" to my notmuch
> > repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed
> > and encrypted messages, in
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:04:23 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> I just love seeing all those yellow signatures. It reminds me to meet
> you all in real life to verify your keys :-).
>
> Thanks for implementing this, the whole lot of you. It works really
> well.
Yes! I'm really glad you're findin
On 02/04/2011 11:59 AM, micah anderson wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:52:01 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> wrote:
>> when you say "encrypted by" do you mean "encrypted to"? do you have
>> access to the corresponding secret key?
>
> If I open a message that was sent to me and was encrypted by the
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:09:48 +, Darren McGuicken
wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:02:41 -0800, Jameson Rollins
> wrote:
> > > Can we pass the decrypted text to message mode on a reply?
> > Yeah, some folks pointed this out on #notmuch this morning. The
> > decryption is only happening in no
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:12:27 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> I reported some pretty weird experiences yesterday on IRC with replies
> not working. It turns out they were caused by having old versions of
> xapian installed in /usr/local (which I think might have caused some
> mixup with headers and l
i tried running
emacs -Q -f notmuch
and replying to a message.
Since i didn't have my emacs config, it wanted to create the default
sent folder in ~/mail/sent
if i told it "no, don't create it" when prompted (during the setup of
the reply message) then the body of the replied-to message doesn'
Hey, folks. I've pushed some improvements to the "crypto" branch that:
* add support for replying to encrypted messages
* don't show sigstatus button for unsigned encrypted messages
As always, please let me know encounter any problems.
jamie.
pgpOKBX6CVNwM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
The db_files and db_subdirs are unnecessary for unchanged directories.
maildir with 1 e-mails:
old version:
$ time ./notmuch new
No new mail.
real0m0.053s
user0m0.028s
sys 0m0.026s
new version:
$ time ./notmuch new
No new m
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Just a note to say that I finally got around to updating the remote
> usage script on the wiki to what I'm using now. With "--format=raw" in,
> it's all pretty straightforward.
Hi Jesse,
thanks for this. I wanted to do this since the -
es of misbehaving mails.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/e63c87db/attachment.pgp>
uchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/92235fa5/attachment-0001.pgp>
available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/66dd73ea/attachment.pgp>
ve revoked.
> is this really a use case worth bothering with?
No.
> do you have a suggestion for how you think it should behave
> differently?
I think my suggestion was already made: short form.
m
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/d3180abd/attachment.pgp>
+signed).
d
tl;dr: yesterdays weirdness was not the fault of J. Rollins.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attac
gnature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/ce9426d4/attachment.pgp>
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/985058d7/attachment.pgp>
next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1030 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/344de8a8/attachment-0001.pgp>
835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/a14fe560/attachment.pgp>
sc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/dbef16ec/attachment.pgp>
enPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/bef43091/attachment.pgp>
-
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/074cd771/attachment.pgp>
The db_files and db_subdirs are unnecessary for unchanged directories.
maildir with 1 e-mails:
old version:
$ time ./notmuch new
No new mail.
real0m0.053s
user0m0.028s
sys 0m0.026s
new version:
$ time ./notmuch new
No new m
27 matches
Mail list logo
