On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:53:18 +1000, Brian May
wrote:
> On 16 May 2011 19:29, Stewart Smith wrote:
>
> > Thought I'd share this bit of my .emacs snippet that may be useful to go
> > on the emacs tips page.
> >
> > This does the following:
> > - sets up a list of possible identities to have mail F
On 16 May 2011 19:29, Stewart Smith wrote:
> Thought I'd share this bit of my .emacs snippet that may be useful to go
> on the emacs tips page.
>
> This does the following:
> - sets up a list of possible identities to have mail From
> - on composing mail, it prompts you for who you want to send m
On 28 May 2011 23:18, Patrick Totzke wrote:
>if r: #because we cant iterate on NoneType
>
I don't understand why, but this line sets r._msgs to None. So it crashes,
because it has no message ids to look for.
If you change it to
if r is not None:
... then it works for me.
Oh, I see, for y
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, 31 May 2011 16:47:27 +0200, Thomas Jost
wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> The thread regarding multiple sender identities seems to have been of
> interest for several people, so I'd like to share a few other snippets
> From my Emacs configuration file.
>
> Please tell me what you think
t, or?
Cheers,
Felix
-- next part --
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: crypto_tests.txt
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110531/95889c83/attachment-0001.txt>
-- next part --
A non-
On Sat, 28 May 2011 14:18:05 +0100, Patrick Totzke
wrote:
> It seems that nobody needed this before. Even in bindings/python/notmuch.py
> only Threads.get_toplevel_messages() gets called, and then a (undocumented)
> Messages.print_messages is used (cf line 639, in show)
>
> any suggestions?
Loo
ubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110531/01259e53/attachment.pgp>
Hi list,
The thread regarding multiple sender identities seems to have been of
interest for several people, so I'd like to share a few other snippets
I just fixed a bug that I should at least mention to the list.
On the notmuch master branch, since May 23, there has been a bug which
could lead to corruption when saving binary attachments from
messages.
A recent change to share more code internally (to provide "notmuch show
--part" rather than
st to avoid the chance of hitting this bug.
Thanks,
-Carl
--
carl.d.worth at intel.com
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/piperm
On Tue, 10 May 2011 07:30:49 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> This is amended patch from
> id:"1304990689-10933-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com"
> to test saving attachments withing Emacs using
> notmuch-show-save-part. It uses test_expect_equal_file instead
> of test_expect_equal as
vailable
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110531/cb540490/attachment.pgp>
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, 31 May 2011 16:47:27 +0200, Thomas Jost wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> The thread regarding multiple sender identities seems to have been of
> interest for several people, so I'd like to share a few other snippets
> From my Emacs configuration file.
>
> Please tell me what you think o
7;ll need to decide if we want to remain
compatible with the old API as well, or just require gmime 2.6; but i
don't think we need to cross that bridge right now.
Regards,
--dkg
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1030 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110531/d18e45ff/attachment.pgp>
Hi, folks. I have pushed a new version of the release-candidate/0.6
branch to my repo [0]. It is all reworked on top of notmuch/master [1],
and includes:
* the miscellaneous fixes/improvements patch series starting at
id:"1306619520-25730-2-git-send-email-jroll...@finestructure.net"
* the notm
vailable
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110531/b777c53e/attachment.pgp>
On Tue, 31 May 2011 00:18:26 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> Hey, Felix. As David said, all crypto tests should be passing with
> libgmime 2.4.24. It would probably be instructive to know which crypto
> tests failed and why. Maybe you could supply some output from the
> failed crypto tes
This adds two callback functions to the sigstatus button. If the sig
status is "good", then clicking the button displays the output of "gpg
--list-keys" on the key fingerprint. If the sigstatus is "bad", then
clicking the button will retrieve the key from the keyserver, and
redisplay the current
This adds two callback functions to the sigstatus button. If the sig
status is "good", then clicking the button displays the output of "gpg
--list-keys" on the key fingerprint. If the sigstatus is "bad", then
clicking the button will retrieve the key from the keyserver, and
redisplay the current
This mentions the fact that prefix arguments are now used to enable to
crypto switch.
---
emacs/notmuch-crypto.el |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-crypto.el b/emacs/notmuch-crypto.el
index 096dc5e..44fccae 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-crypto.
This mentions the fact that prefix arguments are now used to enable to
crypto switch.
---
emacs/notmuch-crypto.el |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-crypto.el b/emacs/notmuch-crypto.el
index 096dc5e..44fccae 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-crypto.
i'm CC'ing the upstream lead developer of gmime here to see if he has
any thoughts (and can correct any misrepresentations from me) -- Hi Jeffrey!
On 05/30/2011 02:43 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Sun, 29 May 2011 11:44:05 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
>> CC -O2 notmuch-reply.o
>> notmuch
On Mon, 30 May 2011 21:30:03 +0200, Felix Geller wrote:
> Most of the test cases in crypto fail as well, but I'm not sure which
> ones are actually supposed to work.
Hey, Felix. As David said, all crypto tests should be passing with
libgmime 2.4.24. It would probably be instructive to know whic
Hi list,
The thread regarding multiple sender identities seems to have been of
interest for several people, so I'd like to share a few other snippets
From my Emacs configuration file.
Please tell me what you think of them. If you like them, I'd be glad to
write some patches so they can be merged
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110531/fbd681ca/attachment-0001.pgp>
25 matches
Mail list logo