Synchronization success stories?

2014-04-13 Thread Tilmann Singer
117118 Til -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 489 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140413/3ae1dfe0/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH] emacs: process crypto for reply only when specified

2014-04-13 Thread David Bremner
Tomi Ollila writes: > > Well, I set notmuch-crypto-process-mime to nil -- it still wants to > sign the message and runs gpg... > Was it nil when you replied, i.e. when the mml tags were created? d

[PATCH] emacs: process crypto for reply only when specified

2014-04-13 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
ure Size: 818 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140413/d5f75bda/attachment.pgp>

[PATCH] emacs: process crypto for reply only when specified

2014-04-13 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, David Bremner wrote: > Jameson Graef Rollins writes: > >> This is a tweak to patch "emacs: sign/encrypt replies to >> signed/encrypted messages" to only add mml crypto flags for replys >> when crypto processing has been activated. >> > > The (merged) patch seems

Synchronization success stories?

2014-04-13 Thread Tilmann Singer
h.dump Til -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 489 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140413/69158c4d/attachment.pgp>

Synchronization success stories?

2014-04-13 Thread dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu
Tilmann Singer writes: > David Mazieres writes: >> What happens if you get a message that's been stuck in a queue for a few >> days and has an old Date: header? > > It would be missed. I have set the timespan to look backwards for new > mail to one month to be a bit safer against the

[PATCH] emacs: process crypto for reply only when specified

2014-04-13 Thread David Bremner
Tomi Ollila writes: > > Code looks OK. +1. I'm interested to see whether replies to signed emails > work on this system where sign/(de|en)cryption just doesn't work (out of > the box) :D > It's a good point. I need to insert my smartcard to sign things, which I'm sometimes too lazy to do. In my

Synchronization success stories?

2014-04-13 Thread David Bremner
Tilmann Singer writes: > > With a reused ssh connection this is sufficiently fast for me (<2s). If > there is interest I can clean up the script of hardcoded paths etc. and > put it on github. Sure, sounds at least as good as what I am using. Also, syncmaildir recently did something pretty

[PATCH] test: use test_expect_equal for PATH test, update message

2014-04-13 Thread David Bremner
- The old test was quite impossible to debug; the new one shows the difference between the two directories, if any. - "repository" doesn't make sense for out of tree builds. Or tarball builds, for that matter. --- I was tracking down a weird issue with out of tree builds. I didn't find the

Synchronization success stories?

2014-04-13 Thread David Mazieres
Tilmann Singer writes: > The steps performed on a sync run are roughly like this: > > - local: notmuch new > - local: notmuch search --output=messages .. > - remote: notmuch new > - remote: notmuch search --output=messages .. > - compare search results > - run rsync for mails that only exist

Re: [PATCH] emacs: process crypto for reply only when specified

2014-04-13 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net writes: This is a tweak to patch emacs: sign/encrypt replies to signed/encrypted messages to only add mml crypto flags for replys when crypto processing has been activated. The

Re: Synchronization success stories?

2014-04-13 Thread Tilmann Singer
I have experimented with offlineimap, syncmaildir and rsync. The append-only approach of notmuch makes synchronization of the mail corpus simpler, so there are lots of options. With ssh access to the server, I found rsync to be conceptually the simplest, but it turned out to be too slow for me

[PATCH] test: use test_expect_equal for PATH test, update message

2014-04-13 Thread David Bremner
- The old test was quite impossible to debug; the new one shows the difference between the two directories, if any. - repository doesn't make sense for out of tree builds. Or tarball builds, for that matter. --- I was tracking down a weird issue with out of tree builds. I didn't find the

Re: [PATCH] test: use test_expect_equal for PATH test, update message

2014-04-13 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: - The old test was quite impossible to debug; the new one shows the difference between the two directories, if any. - repository doesn't make sense for out of tree builds. Or tarball builds, for that matter. --- Looks better

Re: Synchronization success stories?

2014-04-13 Thread David Bremner
Tilmann Singer t...@tils.net writes: With a reused ssh connection this is sufficiently fast for me (2s). If there is interest I can clean up the script of hardcoded paths etc. and put it on github. Sure, sounds at least as good as what I am using. Also, syncmaildir recently did something

Re: Synchronization success stories?

2014-04-13 Thread David Mazieres
Tilmann Singer t...@tils.net writes: The steps performed on a sync run are roughly like this: - local: notmuch new - local: notmuch search --output=messages some time ago..now - remote: notmuch new - remote: notmuch search --output=messages some time ago..now - compare search results -

Re: Synchronization success stories?

2014-04-13 Thread Tilmann Singer
David Mazieres dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu writes: What happens if you get a message that's been stuck in a queue for a few days and has an old Date: header? It would be missed. I have set the timespan to look backwards for new mail to one month to be a bit safer against the

Re: Synchronization success stories?

2014-04-13 Thread dm-list-email-notmuch
Tilmann Singer t...@tils.net writes: David Mazieres dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu writes: What happens if you get a message that's been stuck in a queue for a few days and has an old Date: header? It would be missed. I have set the timespan to look backwards for new mail to one

Re: [PATCH] emacs: process crypto for reply only when specified

2014-04-13 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, David Bremner wrote: Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi writes: Code looks OK. +1. I'm interested to see whether replies to signed emails work on this system where sign/(de|en)cryption just doesn't work (out of the box) :D It's a good point. I need to insert my smartcard

Re: [PATCH] emacs: process crypto for reply only when specified

2014-04-13 Thread David Bremner
Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi writes: Well, I set notmuch-crypto-process-mime to nil -- it still wants to sign the message and runs gpg... Was it nil when you replied, i.e. when the mml tags were created? d ___ notmuch mailing list

Re: [PATCH] emacs: process crypto for reply only when specified

2014-04-13 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote: Perhaps people with no ability to sign are less likely to have notmuch-crypto-process-mime set? Or we can add another configuration variable initialized from notmuch-crypto-process-mime, but allowing people to shut this off. Well, I