David Mazieres writes:
> David Bremner writes:
>
>> Brian Sniffen writes:
>>
>>> I'm thrilled by using notmuch to manage my mail. Low-latency search is
>>> very important to me. But I use computers in a couple of
>>> places---several of which are laptops. Has anyone stories to share of
>>> s
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, David Bremner wrote:
> Tomi Ollila writes:
>
>>
>> Code looks OK. +1. I'm interested to see whether replies to signed emails
>> work on this system where sign/(de|en)cryption just doesn't work (out of
>> the box) :D
>>
>
> It's a good point. I need to insert my smartcard to s
$ notmuch count
117118
Til
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140413/3ae1dfe0/attachment.pgp>
Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> Well, I set notmuch-crypto-process-mime to nil -- it still wants to
> sign the message and runs gpg...
>
Was it nil when you replied, i.e. when the mml tags were created?
d
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>> Perhaps people with no ability to sign are less likely to have
>> "notmuch-crypto-process-mime" set? Or we can add another configuration
>> variable initialized from notmuch-crypto-process-mime, but allowing
>> people to shut this off.
>
> Well, I set no
plication/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140413/d5f75bda/attachment.pgp>
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, David Bremner wrote:
> - The old test was quite impossible to debug; the new one shows the difference
> between the two directories, if any.
>
> - "repository" doesn't make sense for out of tree builds. Or tarball
> builds, for that matter.
> ---
Looks better than the ol
Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> Well, I set notmuch-crypto-process-mime to nil -- it still wants to
> sign the message and runs gpg...
>
Was it nil when you replied, i.e. when the mml tags were created?
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http:
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, David Bremner wrote:
> Jameson Graef Rollins writes:
>
>> This is a tweak to patch "emacs: sign/encrypt replies to
>> signed/encrypted messages" to only add mml crypto flags for replys
>> when crypto processing has been activated.
>>
>
> The (merged) patch seems straightforw
h.dump
Til
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140413/69158c4d/attachment.pgp>
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, David Bremner wrote:
> Tomi Ollila writes:
>
>>
>> Code looks OK. +1. I'm interested to see whether replies to signed emails
>> work on this system where sign/(de|en)cryption just doesn't work (out of
>> the box) :D
>>
>
> It's a good point. I need to insert my smartcard to s
Tilmann Singer writes:
> David Mazieres writes:
>> What happens if you get a message that's been stuck in a queue for a few
>> days and has an old Date: header?
>
> It would be missed. I have set the timespan to look backwards for new
> mail to one month to be a bit safer against the stuck-in-q
Tilmann Singer writes:
> David Mazieres writes:
>> What happens if you get a message that's been stuck in a queue for a few
>> days and has an old Date: header?
>
> It would be missed. I have set the timespan to look backwards for new
> mail to one month to be a bit safer against the stuck-in-q
David Mazieres writes:
> What happens if you get a message that's been stuck in a queue for a few
> days and has an old Date: header?
It would be missed. I have set the timespan to look backwards for new
mail to one month to be a bit safer against the stuck-in-queue cases,
but mails with older D
Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> Code looks OK. +1. I'm interested to see whether replies to signed emails
> work on this system where sign/(de|en)cryption just doesn't work (out of
> the box) :D
>
It's a good point. I need to insert my smartcard to sign things, which
I'm sometimes too lazy to do. In my
Tilmann Singer writes:
>
> With a reused ssh connection this is sufficiently fast for me (<2s). If
> there is interest I can clean up the script of hardcoded paths etc. and
> put it on github.
Sure, sounds at least as good as what I am using. Also, syncmaildir
recently did something pretty anno
- The old test was quite impossible to debug; the new one shows the difference
between the two directories, if any.
- "repository" doesn't make sense for out of tree builds. Or tarball
builds, for that matter.
---
I was tracking down a weird issue with out of tree builds. I didn't
find the is
Tilmann Singer writes:
> The steps performed on a sync run are roughly like this:
>
> - local: notmuch new
> - local: notmuch search --output=messages ..
> - remote: notmuch new
> - remote: notmuch search --output=messages ..
> - compare search results
> - run rsync for mails that only exist loca
Tilmann Singer writes:
> The steps performed on a sync run are roughly like this:
>
> - local: notmuch new
> - local: notmuch search --output=messages ..
> - remote: notmuch new
> - remote: notmuch search --output=messages ..
> - compare search results
> - run rsync for mails that only exist loca
Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> Code looks OK. +1. I'm interested to see whether replies to signed emails
> work on this system where sign/(de|en)cryption just doesn't work (out of
> the box) :D
>
It's a good point. I need to insert my smartcard to sign things, which
I'm sometimes too lazy to do. In my
Tilmann Singer writes:
>
> With a reused ssh connection this is sufficiently fast for me (<2s). If
> there is interest I can clean up the script of hardcoded paths etc. and
> put it on github.
Sure, sounds at least as good as what I am using. Also, syncmaildir
recently did something pretty anno
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, David Bremner wrote:
> - The old test was quite impossible to debug; the new one shows the difference
> between the two directories, if any.
>
> - "repository" doesn't make sense for out of tree builds. Or tarball
> builds, for that matter.
> ---
Looks better than the ol
- The old test was quite impossible to debug; the new one shows the difference
between the two directories, if any.
- "repository" doesn't make sense for out of tree builds. Or tarball
builds, for that matter.
---
I was tracking down a weird issue with out of tree builds. I didn't
find the is
I have experimented with offlineimap, syncmaildir and rsync. The
append-only approach of notmuch makes synchronization of the mail corpus
simpler, so there are lots of options. With ssh access to the server, I
found rsync to be conceptually the simplest, but it turned out to be too
slow for me (w
On Sun, Apr 13 2014, David Bremner wrote:
> Jameson Graef Rollins writes:
>
>> This is a tweak to patch "emacs: sign/encrypt replies to
>> signed/encrypted messages" to only add mml crypto flags for replys
>> when crypto processing has been activated.
>>
>
> The (merged) patch seems straightforw
25 matches
Mail list logo
