On Thu, May 08 2014, David Bremner wrote:
> Tomi Ollila writes:
>
>>
>> But, I'd like suggest alternate option to create a test c program
>> and test whether it compiles (analogous to what there is already
>> done with many other checks) -- this same would apply to fdatasync()
>> case too.
>>
>
David Bremner wrote:
> X?c? writes:
> > As a side note, is there any rationale for the hand-made configure? Not
> > that I am a big fan of autoconf/cmake/whatever either...
>
> Carl Worth had a lot of (negative) experience with autoconf when he
> started the project, which motivated him to roll h
---
compat/have_zlib.c | 6 ++
configure | 21 -
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 compat/have_zlib.c
diff --git a/compat/have_zlib.c b/compat/have_zlib.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..998c697
--- /dev/null
+++ b/compat/h
Added the fallback check for zlib. Tested on FreeBSD stable/10.
C test checks for major zlib compatibility (see zlib doc/examples).
Xīcò (1):
Fallback check for zlib.
compat/have_zlib.c | 6 ++
configure | 21 -
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-
---
compat/have_zlib.c | 6 ++
configure | 21 -
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 compat/have_zlib.c
diff --git a/compat/have_zlib.c b/compat/have_zlib.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..998c697
--- /dev/null
+++ b/compat/h
Added the fallback check for zlib. Tested on FreeBSD stable/10.
C test checks for major zlib compatibility (see zlib doc/examples).
X?c? (1):
Fallback check for zlib.
compat/have_zlib.c | 6 ++
configure | 21 -
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:21 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
>>> The same goes for Travis. There's already a build bot. Why bother
>>> with Travis?
>>
>> I've never seen any buildbot results. TravisCI's interface is just
>> simple and easy. And a
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:21 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
>> Amadeusz ?o?nowski wrote:
>>> The same goes for Travis. There's already a build bot. Why bother
>>> with Travis?
>>
>> I've never seen any buildbot results. TravisCI's interface is just
>> simple and easy. And a
David Bremner wrote:
> Xīcò writes:
> > As a side note, is there any rationale for the hand-made configure? Not
> > that I am a big fan of autoconf/cmake/whatever either...
>
> Carl Worth had a lot of (negative) experience with autoconf when he
> started the project, which motivated him to roll h
Xīcò writes:
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 09:46:00AM +0900, David Bremner wrote:
>> > int main(void)
>> > {
>> > return(ZLIB_VERNUM >= 0x1252);
>> > }
>>
>> OK, that sounds like it could work. Ideally, somebody on FreeBSD could
>> check...
>>
>> d
>
> Such check will work on FreeBSD, and woul
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 09:46:00AM +0900, David Bremner wrote:
> > int main(void)
> > {
> > return(ZLIB_VERNUM >= 0x1252);
> > }
>
> OK, that sounds like it could work. Ideally, somebody on FreeBSD could
> check...
>
> d
Such check will work on FreeBSD, and would be great!
As a side note,
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 09:46:00AM +0900, David Bremner wrote:
> > int main(void)
> > {
> > return(ZLIB_VERNUM >= 0x1252);
> > }
>
> OK, that sounds like it could work. Ideally, somebody on FreeBSD could
> check...
>
> d
Such check will work on FreeBSD, and would be great!
As a side note,
Felipe Contreras writes:
> Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
>> The same goes for Travis. There's already a build bot. Why bother
>> with Travis?
>
> I've never seen any buildbot results. TravisCI's interface is just
> simple and easy. And all it requires is one file.
>
Not to take a position on travis
On Fri, May 09 2014, "Wael M. Nasreddine" wrote:
> ---
Could this work so, that there is separate repo whete .travis.yml resides
and notmuch is there as a git submodule ?
To my eyes this approach looks pretty intrusive: the repository root
directory is polluted with specific .travis.yml file an
Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> Actually my suggestion would be that if that pkg-config line for
> zlib does not work (btw why does it not work)
I guess because FreeBSD (and maybe other systems) have a distinction
between the "base system" and "add on packages" and pkg-config only
works for the latte
TML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140509/7b0478cf/attachment-0001.html>
On Fri, May 09 2014, Mark Walters wrote:
> To use set notmuch-show-mark-read-function to #'notmuch-show-do-seen
I haven't test this function, but I'd expect it to be an option when
manipulating `notmuch-show-mark-read-function' using custom.
This adds a function that marks messages unread if they are "seen"
that is a user configurable amount of them has been visible in the
buffer.
To use set notmuch-show-mark-read-function to #'notmuch-show-do-seen
---
This adds the functionality to do my previous mark unread logic (see
id:139593
stalling the packages.
--dkg
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1010 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140509/6d480033/attachment.pgp>
: 310 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140509/c9427931/attachment.pgp>
> libtalloc-dev python-sphinx
> > +
> > +script: make test
>
> --
> Felipe Contreras
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140509/4e359687/attachment.html>
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:40:27AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
> > To explain my point with RPM specifics, if I were to
> > use separate spec files, python-notmuch would have:
> >
> > Requires: notmuch >=
> >
> > As you can see this only allows for tracking dependency
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140509/3157ffb4/attachment.pgp>
On 05/09/2014 11:19 AM, Wael M. Nasreddine wrote:
> ---
> .travis.yml | 10 ++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 .travis.yml
>
> diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..8d92cdc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/.travis.yml
> @@ -0,0 +1,1
ecide how they
would like it to behave.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 310 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140509/07794693/attachment.pgp>
Hi Trevor,
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:35:30PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:45:27AM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:29:31PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:00:46AM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > > > One of my TODOs is
Hi
I think the functionality is well worth having ("|" cat - > a-file is
ugly!). However, I am not sure about this approach.
The first two patches are fine, although I think I like constructing a
query then quoting rather than quoting bits of a query and bolting them
together (even the both work
On Thu, May 08 2014, David Bremner wrote:
> Tomi Ollila writes:
>
>>
>> But, I'd like suggest alternate option to create a test c program
>> and test whether it compiles (analogous to what there is already
>> done with many other checks) -- this same would apply to fdatasync()
>> case too.
>>
>
On Sat, May 03 2014, dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
> First, are there people out there who do not use a collection of maildir
> directories, with all mail in cur and new?
o/ I completely abandoned the usage of separate mail "folders" since I
started using notmuch. All my mail now
to worry about such things (thank
god!).
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140509/868729c7/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, May 09 2014, Istvan Marko wrote:
> Sebastian Fischmeister writes:
>
>> Is there a possibility to log all tagging actions done in notmuch?
>
> I use a shell wrapper around notmuch to get this:
>
> #! /bin/sh
> echo "notmuch $@" >>$HOME/logs/notmuch.log
> /usr/local/bin/notmuch "$@"
You c
On Fri, 09 May 2014, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Fri, May 09 2014, Mark Walters wrote:
>> This is v4 of this set. v3 is at
>> id:139593-13297-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009 at gmail.com
>>
>> David (dme) was not keen on the logic in the previous patch so I have
>> tried to make it rather mo
Wael M. Nasreddine wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
> > I had to manually find the build. In case anybody wants to check it out:
> >
> > https://travis-ci.org/notmuch/notmuch/builds
>
> To be specific it's build #2 you see the error right here
> https://travis-ci
Wael Nasreddine wrote:
> On Travis Zlib is old and notmuch configure script exits with a
> failure, please see the Travis build #1
Please do not top-post.
I had to manually find the build. In case anybody wants to check it out:
https://travis-ci.org/notmuch/notmuch/builds
--
Felipe Contreras
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> Wael M. Nasreddine wrote:
>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Felipe Contreras
>> wrote:
>> > I had to manually find the build. In case anybody wants to check it
out:
>> >
>> > https://travis-ci.org/notmuch/notmuch/builds
>>
>> To be specif
Wael M. Nasreddine wrote:
> ---
> .travis.yml | 10 ++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 .travis.yml
>
> diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..8d92cdc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/.travis.yml
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +language: c
> +b
Wael M. Nasreddine wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
> > I had to manually find the build. In case anybody wants to check it out:
> >
> > https://travis-ci.org/notmuch/notmuch/builds
>
> To be specific it's build #2 you see the error right here
> https://travis-ci
get your desired behaviour by writing an
alternative `notmuch-show-mark-read-function'?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 310 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140509/84a15507/attachment.pgp>
Following `notmuch-show-pipe-message', add a binding 'S' to save
either the current or all open messages, depending on prefix argument.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 24 +++-
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.
Stylistic only - no functional change.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 59 +--
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el
index 2ed221a..62c0be6 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-show.el
+++ b/e
Fix the indentation of `notmuch-show-mode-map'.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 80 +--
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el
index 10fc872..2ed221a 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-show.e
emacs: Allow saving of threads and messages
Similar to the pipe (|) support, allow saving of threads and messages.
David Edmondson (3):
emacs: Fix indentation.
emacs: Minor re-work of `notmuch-show-pipe-message'
emacs: Add `notmuch-show-save-message' to save messages
emacs/notmuch-show.
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 02:59:02PM +, Wael Nasreddine wrote:
> On Travis Zlib is old and notmuch configure script exits with a
> failure, please see the Travis build #1
I'm just dropping a cross-link to the recent old-zlib discussion here
[1].
Cheers,
Trevor
[1]: id:1397809386-23356-1-git-se
- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140509/c83677d9/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, May 09 2014, Mark Walters wrote:
> To use set notmuch-show-mark-read-function to #'notmuch-show-do-seen
I haven't test this function, but I'd expect it to be an option when
manipulating `notmuch-show-mark-read-function' using custom.
___
notmuch
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> Wael Nasreddine wrote:
>> On Travis Zlib is old and notmuch configure script exits with a
>> failure, please see the Travis build #1
>
> Please do not top-post.
Apologies for that, I was dropping off my son at school and I replied
from my
This adds a function that marks messages unread if they are "seen"
that is a user configurable amount of them has been visible in the
buffer.
To use set notmuch-show-mark-read-function to #'notmuch-show-do-seen
---
This adds the functionality to do my previous mark unread logic (see
id:139593
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Fri, May 09 2014, "Wael M. Nasreddine" wrote:
>
>> ---
>
> Could this work so, that there is separate repo whete .travis.yml resides
> and notmuch is there as a git submodule ?
>
> To my eyes this approach looks pretty intrusive: the reposit
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> Wael Nasreddine wrote:
>> On Travis Zlib is old and notmuch configure script exits with a
>> failure, please see the Travis build #1
>
> Please do not top-post.
Apologies for that, I was dropping off my son at school and I replied
from my
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Fri, May 09 2014, "Wael M. Nasreddine"
> wrote:
>
>> ---
>
> Could this work so, that there is separate repo whete .travis.yml resides
> and notmuch is there as a git submodule ?
>
> To my eyes this approach looks pretty intrusive: the repo
Jameson Graef Rollins writes:
> On Thu, May 08 2014, David Edmondson wrote:
>> [ I'm cycling around back through some old mail. ]
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 17 2013, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
>>> I've just started noticing that when I reply to messages from the emacs
>>> UI, my X clipboard is filled w
would be a great idea, but it seems like too much to entrust to
somebody we just "met".
d
-- next part ------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 647 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140509/7d713f07/attachment.pgp>
Wael Nasreddine wrote:
> On Travis Zlib is old and notmuch configure script exits with a
> failure, please see the Travis build #1
Please do not top-post.
I had to manually find the build. In case anybody wants to check it out:
https://travis-ci.org/notmuch/notmuch/builds
--
Felipe Contreras
_
On Fri, May 09 2014, "Wael M. Nasreddine" wrote:
> ---
Could this work so, that there is separate repo whete .travis.yml resides
and notmuch is there as a git submodule ?
To my eyes this approach looks pretty intrusive: the repository root
directory is polluted with specific .travis.yml file an
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:40:27AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >
> > > To explain my point with RPM specifics, if I were to
> > > use separate spec files, python-notmuch would have:
> > >
> > > Requires: notmuch >=
> > >
> > > As you can see this
On Travis Zlib is old and notmuch configure script exits with a failure,
please see the Travis build #1
On Friday, May 9, 2014 7:52:44 AM, Felipe Contreras <
felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wael M. Nasreddine wrote:
> > ---
> > .travis.yml | 10 ++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(
Wael M. Nasreddine wrote:
> ---
> .travis.yml | 10 ++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 .travis.yml
>
> diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..8d92cdc
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/.travis.yml
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +language: c
> +b
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> You have a point, however I would still disagree. You seem to use
> Gentoo, and I think what you say works better for Gentoo because it is
> a source distribution. For binary distributions, this is a bit harder
> (and limiting).
No, it's not harder.
> To explain my point wit
Wael Nasreddine writes:
> I didn't see the previous email about it, thank you Jani for the link. It
> looks like you guys have your hands full and everything setup the way you
> like it, so here's what I'll do myself (if it's acceptable with you,
> otherwise I'll just remove everything):
>
> - Re
Amadeusz ?o?nowski wrote:
> The same goes for Travis. There's already a build bot. Why bother
> with Travis?
I've never seen any buildbot results. TravisCI's interface is just
simple and easy. And all it requires is one file.
--
Felipe Contreras
---
.travis.yml | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 .travis.yml
diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
new file mode 100644
index 000..8d92cdc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.travis.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+language: c
+before_install:
+ - sudo apt-get update -qq
+ - wge
---
.travis.yml | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 .travis.yml
diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
new file mode 100644
index 000..8d92cdc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.travis.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+language: c
+before_install:
+ - sudo apt-get update -qq
+ - wge
On Fri, May 09 2014, Mark Walters wrote:
> The first two patches are fine, although I think I like constructing a
> query then quoting rather than quoting bits of a query and bolting them
> together (even the both work).
Agreed. I've no idea what I was thinking.
> My concern is that the current a
Charles Celerier writes:
> I will be the first too admit that I do not know much about configure
> scripts, but adding a TRUE variable seemed straightforward.
configure is already big enough, I'd prefer not to add new things unless
they are needed. This is not likely to be something the user w
Charles Celerier writes:
> David Bremner writes:
>
>> Charles Celerier writes:
>>> test_begin_subtest 'comparing existing to exported symbols'
>>> -objdump -t $TEST_DIRECTORY/../lib/*.o | awk '$4 == ".text" && $6 ~
>>> "^notmuch" {print $6}' | sort | uniq > ACTUAL
>>> +nm -g $TEST_DIRECTORY/.
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:40:27AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >
> > > To explain my point with RPM specifics, if I were to
> > > use separate spec files, python-notmuch would have:
> > >
> > > Requires: notmuch >=
> > >
> > > As you can see this
On Fri, May 09 2014, Mark Walters wrote:
>> Just to confirm: you can get your desired behaviour by writing an
>> alternative `notmuch-show-mark-read-function'?
>
> Yes I can confirm that. So if this went in I can get the behaviour of
> the earlier series without needing to patch notmuch.
>
> We can
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:40:27AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
> > To explain my point with RPM specifics, if I were to
> > use separate spec files, python-notmuch would have:
> >
> > Requires: notmuch >=
> >
> > As you can see this only allows for tracking dependency
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> You have a point, however I would still disagree. You seem to use
> Gentoo, and I think what you say works better for Gentoo because it is
> a source distribution. For binary distributions, this is a bit harder
> (and limiting).
No, it's not harder.
> To explain my point wit
Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> The same goes for Travis. There's already a build bot. Why bother
> with Travis?
I've never seen any buildbot results. TravisCI's interface is just
simple and easy. And all it requires is one file.
--
Felipe Contreras
___
n
Hi,
Wael Nasreddine writes:
> I was a bit disappointed that the project is not living (or at least
> mirrored) to Github, it would have made my search much easier.
How GitHub would help with this? I believe that most of search engines
reach Notmuch home page.
GitHub is not the center of the wo
Hi
I think the functionality is well worth having ("|" cat - > a-file is
ugly!). However, I am not sure about this approach.
The first two patches are fine, although I think I like constructing a
query then quoting rather than quoting bits of a query and bolting them
together (even the both work
Hi Trevor,
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:35:30PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:45:27AM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:29:31PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:00:46AM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > > > One of my TODOs is
On Fri, 09 May 2014, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Fri, May 09 2014, Mark Walters wrote:
>> This is v4 of this set. v3 is at
>> id:139593-13297-1-git-send-email-markwalters1...@gmail.com
>>
>> David (dme) was not keen on the logic in the previous patch so I have
>> tried to make it rather more
On Fri, May 09 2014, Istvan Marko wrote:
> Sebastian Fischmeister writes:
>
>> Is there a possibility to log all tagging actions done in notmuch?
>
> I use a shell wrapper around notmuch to get this:
>
> #! /bin/sh
> echo "notmuch $@" >>$HOME/logs/notmuch.log
> /usr/local/bin/notmuch "$@"
You c
r'.
>
> Or if the branch with the modifications was called something else, like
> 'travis-ci'.
>
> --
> Felipe Contreras
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140509/a6838aa3/attachment.html>
On Fri, May 09 2014, Mark Walters wrote:
> This is v4 of this set. v3 is at
> id:139593-13297-1-git-send-email-markwalters1...@gmail.com
>
> David (dme) was not keen on the logic in the previous patch so I have
> tried to make it rather more customisable and made this version much
> closer to
Stylistic only - no functional change.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 59 +--
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el
index 2ed221a..62c0be6 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-show.el
+++ b/e
Following `notmuch-show-pipe-message', add a binding 'S' to save
either the current or all open messages, depending on prefix argument.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 24 +++-
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.
emacs: Allow saving of threads and messages
Similar to the pipe (|) support, allow saving of threads and messages.
David Edmondson (3):
emacs: Fix indentation.
emacs: Minor re-work of `notmuch-show-pipe-message'
emacs: Add `notmuch-show-save-message' to save messages
emacs/notmuch-show.
Add a function for updating seen messages to the
post-command-hook. This function calls a customizable (by eg
defcustom) function with parameters the start and end of the current
window and that function can decide what to mark read based on that
and the current point.
Since this is in the post-co
From: David Bremner
The unread/read changes will use the post-command-hook. test_emacs
does not call the post-command-hook. This adds a notmuch-test-progn
which takes a list of commands as argument and executes them in turn
but runs the post-command-hook after each one.
The caller can batch oper
This is v4 of this set. v3 is at
id:139593-13297-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009 at gmail.com
David (dme) was not keen on the logic in the previous patch so I have
tried to make it rather more customisable and made this version much
closer to the existing logic.
This version marks the curre
Sebastian Fischmeister writes:
> Is there a possibility to log all tagging actions done in notmuch?
I use a shell wrapper around notmuch to get this:
#! /bin/sh
Sebastian Fischmeister writes:
> Is there a possibility to log all tagging actions done in notmuch?
I use a shell wrapper around notmuch to get this:
#! /bin/sh
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:29:31PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:00:46AM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > One of my TODOs is to also package the ruby bindings, and
> > notmuch-vim. The only thing preventing me now is my unfamiliarty
> > with ruby, and Fedora packaging guide
information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140509/89808ba7/attachment.html>
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:01:56PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> Agreed. The only problem I'd have is that you'd want to say that the
> GitHub repo was a mirror, since the primary repo would still be
> git://notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch. If it's a mirror, I think it
> should mirror all refs on th
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:21:00PM +0200, guyzmo wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 10:30:19PM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:14:51PM -0700, Wael M. Nasreddine wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Wael Nasreddine
> > > wrote:
> [...]
> > > Can you guys at least consi
89 matches
Mail list logo
