[PATCH 2/2] add edit function to resume postponed emails

2011-07-21 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Jameson, On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:40:44 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:36:43 -0400, Antoine Beaupr? > wrote: > > I think this is a great idea. Unfortunately, I had a lot of trouble > > making message-mode digest an existing buffer. For example, if you take > > any

Re: [PATCH 2/2] add edit function to resume postponed emails

2011-07-21 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Jameson, On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:40:44 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:36:43 -0400, Antoine Beaupré > wrote: > > I think this is a great idea. Unfortunately, I had a lot of trouble > > making message-mode digest an existing buffer. For example, if you take > > an

[PATCH] fix sum moar typos

2011-06-05 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Pieter, On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:54:12 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote: > Because they cause global warming. > > Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet > --- > > TL;DR: Various typo fixes. Applies to jrollins/release-candidate/0.6 > (2baf08f5) > > Due to the impending 0.6 release, I've gone off on an epheme

Re: [PATCH] fix sum moar typos

2011-06-05 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Pieter, On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:54:12 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote: > Because they cause global warming. > > Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet > --- > > TL;DR: Various typo fixes. Applies to jrollins/release-candidate/0.6 > (2baf08f5) > > Due to the impending 0.6 release, I've gone off on an epheme

[PATCH] Added C-up and C-down to cycle through previous searches

2011-06-05 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Sun, 29 May 2011 20:04:00 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > Hi Dima. > > On Sun, 29 May 2011 01:56:28 -0700, notmuch at dima.secretsauce.net wrote: > > From: Dima Kogan > > > > --- > > > > Hi. > > > > I made a few improvements to the emacs UI. This patch allows the user to > > scrol

Re: [PATCH] Added C-up and C-down to cycle through previous searches

2011-06-05 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Sun, 29 May 2011 20:04:00 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > Hi Dima. > > On Sun, 29 May 2011 01:56:28 -0700, notm...@dima.secretsauce.net wrote: > > From: Dima Kogan > > > > --- > > > > Hi. > > > > I made a few improvements to the emacs UI. This patch allows the user to > > scroll

When will we have our next release?

2011-06-04 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:21:00 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Overall I think Carl's time based release proposal is a reasonable > plan. I think one problem we've been having is that we seem to have lost > track of > > # Releases of notmuch have a two-digit version (0.1, 0.2, etc.). We >

When will we have our next release?

2011-06-04 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Carl, On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:56:42 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:39:13 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote: > > Can we set a target date for 0.6 release? So we'll all start feeling > > really bad if we miss it? > > Frankly, I wouldn't mind doing strict

Re: When will we have our next release?

2011-06-04 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:21:00 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Overall I think Carl's time based release proposal is a reasonable > plan. I think one problem we've been having is that we seem to have lost > track of > > # Releases of notmuch have a two-digit version (0.1, 0.2, etc.). We >

Re: When will we have our next release?

2011-06-04 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Carl, On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:56:42 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:39:13 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins > wrote: > > Can we set a target date for 0.6 release? So we'll all start feeling > > really bad if we miss it? > > Frankly, I wouldn't mind doing strict time-based relea

[RFC] Several minor enhancements to the Emacs interface

2011-05-31 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Thomas, On Tue, 31 May 2011 16:47:27 +0200, Thomas Jost wrote: > Hi list, > > The thread regarding multiple sender identities seems to have been of > interest for several people, so I'd like to share a few other snippets > From my Emacs configuration file. > > Please tell me what you think

Re: [RFC] Several minor enhancements to the Emacs interface

2011-05-31 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Thomas, On Tue, 31 May 2011 16:47:27 +0200, Thomas Jost wrote: > Hi list, > > The thread regarding multiple sender identities seems to have been of > interest for several people, so I'd like to share a few other snippets > From my Emacs configuration file. > > Please tell me what you think o

Header and other questions

2011-05-16 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Mon, 16 May 2011 09:29:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal > wrote: > > The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive > > for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region > > without thin

Re: Header and other questions

2011-05-16 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Mon, 16 May 2011 09:29:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal > wrote: > > The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive > > for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region > > without thi

Header and other questions

2011-05-15 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi On Sat, 14 May 2011 22:23:16 -0700, mueen at nawaz.org wrote: > 3. Can I mark a bunch of messages for tagging in the Emacs interface? I > know I can tag all messages in a query, but sometimes I'd just like to > select a few manually and tag them (or apply some other command to > them). I do n

Re: Header and other questions

2011-05-15 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi On Sat, 14 May 2011 22:23:16 -0700, mu...@nawaz.org wrote: > 3. Can I mark a bunch of messages for tagging in the Emacs interface? I > know I can tag all messages in a query, but sometimes I'd just like to > select a few manually and tag them (or apply some other command to > them). I do not

notmuch painfully slow

2011-05-05 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:04:13 +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > thank you all for your answers! I second that and thanks to your performance page, I finally switched to chert format database. That's day and night ! Thank you ! /Xavier

Re: notmuch painfully slow

2011-05-05 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:04:13 +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > thank you all for your answers! I second that and thanks to your performance page, I finally switched to chert format database. That's day and night ! Thank you ! /Xavier ___ notmu

emacs/notmuch.el:55:1: Error: Cannot open load file: json

2011-04-27 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:16:38 -0700 (PDT), gma wrote: > While attempting to make the 0.5 tarball on my Mac OS X system, I get: > > > emacs/notmuch.el:55:1:Error: Cannot open load file: json > make: *** [emacs/notmuch.elc] Error 1 > > > I can build from master with --without-emacs but this isn't

Warning when GMime is parsing broken email addresses

2011-04-27 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:23:41 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:20:26 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote: > > Maybe it would also be interesting to add a warning/assertion to check > > that all email adresses added to the database are correct email > > addresses? I.e. check that the `ad

Re: emacs/notmuch.el:55:1: Error: Cannot open load file: json

2011-04-27 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:16:38 -0700 (PDT), gma wrote: > While attempting to make the 0.5 tarball on my Mac OS X system, I get: > > > emacs/notmuch.el:55:1:Error: Cannot open load file: json > make: *** [emacs/notmuch.elc] Error 1 > > > I can build from master with --without-emacs but this isn't

Re: Warning when GMime is parsing broken email addresses

2011-04-27 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:23:41 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:20:26 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote: > > Maybe it would also be interesting to add a warning/assertion to check > > that all email adresses added to the database are correct email > > addresses? I.e. check that the `ad

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-26 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Carl, On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:27:26 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > My goal is to use notmuch remotely directly on my IMAP server but there > > are problems when doing notmuch new in the dovecot tree (dovecot index > > files if I recall correctly). > > Can you describe what the specific problems

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-25 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Carl, On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:27:26 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > My goal is to use notmuch remotely directly on my IMAP server but there > > are problems when doing notmuch new in the dovecot tree (dovecot index > > files if I recall correctly). > > Can you describe what the specific problems

notmuch painfully slow

2011-04-23 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Pieter, On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 22:18:09 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote: > On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:14:52 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > > > as time goes, notmuch is really becoming slower and slower. It may be > > normal as it has more and more messages to "track" b

Re: notmuch painfully slow

2011-04-23 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Pieter, On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 22:18:09 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote: > On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:14:52 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > > > as time goes, notmuch is really becoming slower and slower. It may be > > normal as it has more and more messages to "track" b

notmuch painfully slow

2011-04-22 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, as time goes, notmuch is really becoming slower and slower. It may be normal as it has more and more messages to "track" but I am not sure it is that normal give these numbers: - notmuch version: notmuch 0.5-133-gc509598 - notmuch count: 18475 - uname: Linux kcals 2.6.33.4-smp #2 SMP Wed May

notmuch painfully slow

2011-04-22 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, as time goes, notmuch is really becoming slower and slower. It may be normal as it has more and more messages to "track" but I am not sure it is that normal give these numbers: - notmuch version: notmuch 0.5-133-gc509598 - notmuch count: 18475 - uname: Linux kcals 2.6.33.4-smp #2 SMP Wed May

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-20 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:18:15 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:29:53 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > Thank you for your answer. Dumb question: are procmail and IMAP "closed > > to friends" ? I would think yes but only on server side, right or &g

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-20 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:18:15 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:29:53 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > Thank you for your answer. Dumb question: are procmail and IMAP "closed > > to friends" ? I would think yes but only on server side, right or &g

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-18 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:44:35 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:22:37 +0200, Xavier Maillard > wrote: > > Do you think this could be done directly in a SIEVE script ? > > Probably not, but you could with procmail. SIEVE does not allow > execution of u

(auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-18 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 00:44:06 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote: > Hi Florian! > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:03:12 +0200, Florian Friesdorf > wrote: > > Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a > > WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I am waiting for an > > answe

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-18 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:44:35 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:22:37 +0200, Xavier Maillard > wrote: > > Do you think this could be done directly in a SIEVE script ? > > Probably not, but you could with procmail. SIEVE does not allow > execution of u

[PATCH 2/2] emacs: notmuch-hello: Add "n" and "p" to mod map

2011-04-18 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Pieter, On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:26:11 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:48:45 +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > > Bind "n" to widget-forward and "p" to widget-backward to unify the > > interface since other notmuch major mode also accept "n" and "p" to > > navigation. > > --- > >

Re: (auto-)tagging sent messages

2011-04-18 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 00:44:06 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote: > Hi Florian! > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:03:12 +0200, Florian Friesdorf > wrote: > > Further, for certain mails I sent (like this one ) I would like a > > WAITING tag (or similar) in order to indicate that I am waiting for an > > answe

Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: notmuch-hello: Add "n" and "p" to mod map

2011-04-18 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Pieter, On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:26:11 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:48:45 +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > > Bind "n" to widget-forward and "p" to widget-backward to unify the > > interface since other notmuch major mode also accept "n" and "p" to > > navigation. > > --- > >

crypto branch rebased

2011-03-31 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Jameson, On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 23:41:05 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > I've rebased my crypto branch [0] against cworth's master at 74bc93f0. Just an OT message to inform you that my notmuch/emacs couple no longer crashes here. I did not find out why it crashed before though. /Xavier

Re: crypto branch rebased

2011-03-31 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Jameson, On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 23:41:05 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > I've rebased my crypto branch [0] against cworth's master at 74bc93f0. Just an OT message to inform you that my notmuch/emacs couple no longer crashes here. I did not find out why it crashed before though. /Xavier _

[RFC] Enhancements to address completion

2011-03-19 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:06:53 +0100, Kristoffer Str?m wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:26:20 +0100, Kristoffer Str?m > rymdkoloni.se> wrote: > > > > > I use it for completing through a modified version of eudc-select. > > > > Would you mind posting this 'modified version of eudc-select' here ?

Re: [RFC] Enhancements to address completion

2011-03-19 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:06:53 +0100, Kristoffer Ström wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:26:20 +0100, Kristoffer Ström > > wrote: > > > > > I use it for completing through a modified version of eudc-select. > > > > Would you mind posting this 'modified version of eudc-select' here ? > Not at

Re: [RFC] Enhancements to address completion

2011-03-15 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hey Kristoffer On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:26:20 +0100, Kristoffer Ström wrote: > I use it for completing through a modified version of eudc-select. Would you mind posting this 'modified version of eudc-select' here ? /Xavier ___ notmuch mailing list not

[RFC] Enhancements to address completion

2011-03-14 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hey Kristoffer On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:26:20 +0100, Kristoffer Str?m wrote: > I use it for completing through a modified version of eudc-select. Would you mind posting this 'modified version of eudc-select' here ? /Xavier

Backtrace with latest crypto branch

2011-03-13 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi David, On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:20:05 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:14:55 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > No problem, Cc'ing accordingly. > > > > Hope that'll help in debugging this issue. > > &g

Backtrace with latest crypto branch

2011-03-13 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:13:34 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:14:55 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > I did update and restarted emacs, yes. > > Pressing RET on any message failed with the given backtrace. It also > > just displays headers but noth

Re: Backtrace with latest crypto branch

2011-03-13 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi David, On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:20:05 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:14:55 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > No problem, Cc'ing accordingly. > > > > Hope that'll help in debugging this issue. > > &g

Re: Backtrace with latest crypto branch

2011-03-13 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:13:34 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:14:55 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > I did update and restarted emacs, yes. > > Pressing RET on any message failed with the given backtrace. It also > > just displays headers

Backtrace with latest crypto branch

2011-03-09 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:42:49 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 23:37:45 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > The problem is when I am trying to display any message from you using > > the crypto branch. The right configuration variable is explictly set: > &g

Re: Backtrace with latest crypto branch

2011-03-09 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:42:49 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 23:37:45 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > The problem is when I am trying to display any message from you using > > the crypto branch. The right configuration variable is explictly set: >

change of crypto mime customization variable

2011-03-07 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Jameson, On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 16:10:06 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > Hey, folks. I just wanted to give all the crypto early adopters a heads > up that I just changed the crypto customization variable name in my > crypto branch to be: Not sure if is related to these changes but your latest e

Re: change of crypto mime customization variable

2011-03-07 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Jameson, On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 16:10:06 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > Hey, folks. I just wanted to give all the crypto early adopters a heads > up that I just changed the crypto customization variable name in my > crypto branch to be: Not sure if is related to these changes but your latest

ordering threads by the latest message in a thread ?

2011-03-02 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Sebastien, On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 21:03:06 +0100, Sebastien Binet wrote: > so, say I have the following messages and threads: > id_0 1/3 [important meeting] - (received Monday) > id_1 2/3 [important meeting] - (received Tuesday) > id_2 1/1 [pick groceries] - (received Wednesday) > id_3 3/3

Re: ordering threads by the latest message in a thread ?

2011-03-02 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Sebastien, On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 21:03:06 +0100, Sebastien Binet wrote: > so, say I have the following messages and threads: > id_0 1/3 [important meeting] - (received Monday) > id_1 2/3 [important meeting] - (received Tuesday) > id_2 1/1 [pick groceries] - (received Wednesday) > id_3 3/3

running the crypto branch [was: Re: Hiding HTML mime-parts and/or scrubbing (gmail's) HTML-based citation]

2011-02-28 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hey Jamie, On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:27:35 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 01:00:08 +0100, Xavier Maillard > wrote: > > What is the easy way to switch to your codebase from notmuch mainline ? > > I mean, what exact commands do we need to type in order to u

Re: running the crypto branch [was: Re: Hiding HTML mime-parts and/or scrubbing (gmail's) HTML-based citation]

2011-02-28 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hey Jamie, On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:27:35 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 01:00:08 +0100, Xavier Maillard > wrote: > > What is the easy way to switch to your codebase from notmuch mainline ? > > I mean, what exact commands do we need to type in order to u

Hiding HTML mime-parts and/or scrubbing (gmail's) HTML-based citation

2011-02-27 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:01:27 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:10:22 +0100, Albin Stjerna wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:59:03 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor > fifthhorseman.net> wrote: > > > > > I'm running the crypto branch (from jrollins, available at > > > git://fin

Hiding HTML mime-parts and/or scrubbing (gmail's) HTML-based citation

2011-02-27 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Rob, On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:13:26 -0600, Rob Browning wrote: > The "Display Customization" section in the emacs/mime info pages might > also be interesting. i.e. at the moment I use > mm-discouraged-alternatives like this (via Gnus): > > (setq mm-discouraged-alternatives > '("tex

RFC: Dovecot locking

2011-02-27 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Rob, On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:59:09 -0600, Rob Browning wrote: > For now, I'm interested in general comments, i.e. is this desirable, is > it a reasonable approach, etc. As you can see, there's no config > handling yet, so -llockfile is added unconditionally. I need this since I can't curren

Re: Hiding HTML mime-parts and/or scrubbing (gmail's) HTML-based citation

2011-02-26 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:01:27 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:10:22 +0100, Albin Stjerna wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:59:03 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor > > wrote: > > > > > I'm running the crypto branch (from jrollins, available at > > > git://finestructure.net/

Re: Hiding HTML mime-parts and/or scrubbing (gmail's) HTML-based citation

2011-02-26 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Rob, On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 19:13:26 -0600, Rob Browning wrote: > The "Display Customization" section in the emacs/mime info pages might > also be interesting. i.e. at the moment I use > mm-discouraged-alternatives like this (via Gnus): > > (setq mm-discouraged-alternatives > '("text

Re: RFC: Dovecot locking

2011-02-26 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Rob, On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:59:09 -0600, Rob Browning wrote: > For now, I'm interested in general comments, i.e. is this desirable, is > it a reasonable approach, etc. As you can see, there's no config > handling yet, so -llockfile is added unconditionally. I need this since I can't current

[PATCH] configure: add options to disable emacs/zsh/bash and choose install dir.

2011-01-24 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Cedric, On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:33:43 +0100, C?dric Cabessa wrote: > add --bashcompletiondir and --zshcompletiondir (like --emacslispdir) to choose > installation dir for bash/zsh completion files > > Make some features optional: > --without-emacs / --with-emacs=no do not install lisp file >

Re: [PATCH] configure: add options to disable emacs/zsh/bash and choose install dir.

2011-01-23 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Cedric, On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:33:43 +0100, Cédric Cabessa wrote: > add --bashcompletiondir and --zshcompletiondir (like --emacslispdir) to choose > installation dir for bash/zsh completion files > > Make some features optional: > --without-emacs / --with-emacs=no do not install lisp file >

Re: Folder-based searching

2011-01-17 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:46:53 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > I'm as sad as anyone to see that I let more than a month go by without > committing to the notmuch repository. Life goes like this... > But I've just now committed the much-desired folder-based search > feature. Awesome ! > This sh

Folder-based searching

2011-01-17 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:46:53 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > I'm as sad as anyone to see that I let more than a month go by without > committing to the notmuch repository. Life goes like this... > But I've just now committed the much-desired folder-based search > feature. Awesome ! > This sho

How notmuchmail guess the 'from' and what to do in To and Cc ?

2010-12-03 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, all is in the subject but I will try to clarify. On this mailing list, when pressing the 'r' key to post an answer to a message, my From header is automatically filled with my 'backup' email address and I do not know why. My primary is this one. How does it guess that ? Second, once again, t

[PATCH] add headers cc: bcc: and to: (as exactto:) to search index

2010-12-03 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:48:03 -0800, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 21:33:55 +0100, Joel Borggr?n-Franck > wrote: > > From: Joel Borggr?n-Franck > > > > Add headers cc: bcc: and to: to index. Real header to: is searched as > > "exactto:foo at bar.baz" and search term "to:" is k

How notmuchmail guess the 'from' and what to do in To and Cc ?

2010-12-02 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, all is in the subject but I will try to clarify. On this mailing list, when pressing the 'r' key to post an answer to a message, my From header is automatically filled with my 'backup' email address and I do not know why. My primary is this one. How does it guess that ? Second, once again, t

Re: [PATCH] add headers cc: bcc: and to: (as exactto:) to search index

2010-12-02 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:48:03 -0800, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 21:33:55 +0100, Joel Borggrén-Franck > wrote: > > From: Joel Borggrén-Franck > > > > Add headers cc: bcc: and to: to index. Real header to: is searched as > > "exactto:f...@bar.baz" and search term "to:" is kept

Re: [GNU EMACS] smtpmail package and queue

2010-12-02 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Philip, On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:38:24 +, Philip Hands wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 03:01:47 +0100, first last > wrote: > > msmtp includes (at last in some distros I think) a script that enqeues mails > > when you are offline and sends them when you are online. It is a drop-in > > replaceme

Re: [GNU EMACS] smtpmail package and queue

2010-12-02 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 03:01:47 +0100, first last wrote: > msmtp includes (at last in some distros I think) a script that enqeues mails > when you are offline and sends them when you are online. It is a drop-in > replacement for sendmail. Ok and thank you for msmtp but what about smtpmail.el ?

[GNU EMACS] smtpmail package and queue

2010-12-02 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Philip, On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:38:24 +, Philip Hands wrote: > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 03:01:47 +0100, first last googlemail.com> wrote: > > msmtp includes (at last in some distros I think) a script that enqeues mails > > when you are offline and sends them when you are online. It is a drop-in

[GNU EMACS] smtpmail package and queue

2010-12-01 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 03:01:47 +0100, first last wrote: > msmtp includes (at last in some distros I think) a script that enqeues mails > when you are offline and sends them when you are online. It is a drop-in > replacement for sendmail. Ok and thank you for msmtp but what about smtpmail.el ?

[GNU EMACS] smtpmail package and queue

2010-11-30 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, in this thread (id:"m2wrqc52uc.fsf at kcals.maillard.im"), I was asking whether `smtpmail-send-it' function was able to queue messages when SMTP server was unreachable. As far as I can tell, I did not find anything. Does anybody know if it is possible at all ? Thank you -- Xavier

[GNU EMACS] smtpmail package and queue

2010-11-30 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, in this thread (id:"m2wrqc52uc@kcals.maillard.im"), I was asking whether `smtpmail-send-it' function was able to queue messages when SMTP server was unreachable. As far as I can tell, I did not find anything. Does anybody know if it is possible at all ? Thank you -- Xavier _

Re: Folders to tags

2010-11-29 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 07:57:08 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:48:17 -0500, Austin Clements wrote: > > Ideally, notmuch would let me search by maildir folder, which would have the > > added advantage of keeping things in sync going forward. Unfortunately, > > this looks di

Re: [FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-29 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Sebastian, On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:54:54 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:20:39 +0100, Xavier Maillard > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:00:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:30:45 -0500, Ben

Folders to tags

2010-11-28 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 07:57:08 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:48:17 -0500, Austin Clements wrote: > > Ideally, notmuch would let me search by maildir folder, which would have the > > added advantage of keeping things in sync going forward. Unfortunately, > > this looks di

[FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-28 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Sebastian, On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:54:54 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:20:39 +0100, Xavier Maillard > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:00:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth > SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:30:4

Difference between search and filter

2010-11-25 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi [I know I am really late on this one ;)] On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:16:53 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:23:01 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > GNU Emacs interface comes with 2 functions I am not sure I am > > using correctly. > > > > What's

[FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-25 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:00:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:30:45 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote: > > I, for one, simply have a get-mail script > > which calls offlineimap, notmuch new, and finally my sorting > > script. This seems like a more straightforward way to manage thi

Re: Difference between search and filter

2010-11-25 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi [I know I am really late on this one ;)] On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:16:53 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:23:01 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > GNU Emacs interface comes with 2 functions I am not sure I am > > using correctly. > > > > What's

Re: [FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-25 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:00:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:30:45 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote: > > I, for one, simply have a get-mail script > > which calls offlineimap, notmuch new, and finally my sorting > > script. This seems like a more straightforward way to manage thi

[FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-24 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, Am I alone thinking it could be cool to specify a post-processing script to run after 'notmuch new' ? Currently, one can tell notmuch to add a unique tag but I guess we could extend this to something much smarter. I guess I am not alone using a tagging script after each refresh. What do you

notmuch release 0.5 now available

2010-11-24 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:15:34 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:59:23 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:03:35 -0500, Jameson Rollins > finestructure.net> wrote: > > > "Fcc" means something like "file cc",

hint: ignoring threads

2010-11-24 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:47:13 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > I like to ignore annoying threads, but notmuch has not easy way to > achieve it, right? Well, it actually has... If it has, it is only ugly hack in my point of view. What is missing the most currently is scoring rules ala GNUS (f

[FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new

2010-11-24 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, Am I alone thinking it could be cool to specify a post-processing script to run after 'notmuch new' ? Currently, one can tell notmuch to add a unique tag but I guess we could extend this to something much smarter. I guess I am not alone using a tagging script after each refresh. What do you

Re: notmuch release 0.5 now available

2010-11-24 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:15:34 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:59:23 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:03:35 -0500, Jameson Rollins > > wrote: > > > "Fcc" means something like "file cc", which means that

Re: hint: ignoring threads

2010-11-24 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:47:13 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > I like to ignore annoying threads, but notmuch has not easy way to > achieve it, right? Well, it actually has... If it has, it is only ugly hack in my point of view. What is missing the most currently is scoring rules ala GNUS (f

Handling PATCH from notmuchmail

2010-11-23 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, Thank you all for your answers. On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:27:34 +0100, Jed Brown wrote: > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:41:40 +0100, Michal Sojka > wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > M-x cd ~/src/notmuch > > | git am > > An arguable re

Re: Handling PATCH from notmuchmail

2010-11-23 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, Thank you all for your answers. On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:27:34 +0100, Jed Brown wrote: > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:41:40 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > M-x cd ~/src/notmuch > > | git am > > An arguable refinement is

notmuch release 0.5 now available

2010-11-22 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:03:35 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:38:00 +0100, Xavier Maillard > wrote: > > I am not sure I understand what Fcc and I'd be happy someone is > > explaining this to me :) > > "Fcc" means something lik

id:message-id should be links [Re: [SCM] The notmuchmail.org wiki. branch, master, updated. cf29c08b8cafb56c6ac04917ac2cb1f63f6cda1b]

2010-11-22 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Gregor, On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:46:57 +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote: > Hi David, > * David Edmondson [15. Nov. 2010]: > > On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:29:37 -0800 (PST), notmuch-commits-sender at > > notmuchmail.org (Anonymous Git Pusher (for wiki)) wrote: > >> - Log -

Handling PATCH from notmuchmail

2010-11-22 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hello, out of curiosity, how hackers on this mailing list and using notmuch (through GNU Emacs client if at all) do handle all the patches sent here ? I mean, what commands/keystrokes do you use in order to apply your patches ? Thank you very much. /Xavier

notmuch release 0.5 now available

2010-11-22 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, I am quite late too but I just found time to upgrade from my old 0.3.1 version to this one and WOW ! The differences are really huge ! What I appreciate most at the moment: blasting performance which makes my SSD much much more happier ! I am not sure I understand what Fcc and I'd be happy s

Re: notmuch release 0.5 now available

2010-11-22 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:03:35 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:38:00 +0100, Xavier Maillard > wrote: > > I am not sure I understand what Fcc and I'd be happy someone is > > explaining this to me :) > > "Fcc" means something lik

Re: id:message-id should be links [Re: [SCM] The notmuchmail.org wiki. branch, master, updated. cf29c08b8cafb56c6ac04917ac2cb1f63f6cda1b]

2010-11-22 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi Gregor, On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:46:57 +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote: > Hi David, > * David Edmondson [15. Nov. 2010]: > > On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:29:37 -0800 (PST), > > notmuch-commits-sen...@notmuchmail.org (Anonymous Git Pusher (for wiki)) > > wrote: > >> - Log ---

Handling PATCH from notmuchmail

2010-11-22 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hello, out of curiosity, how hackers on this mailing list and using notmuch (through GNU Emacs client if at all) do handle all the patches sent here ? I mean, what commands/keystrokes do you use in order to apply your patches ? Thank you very much. /Xavier __

Re: notmuch release 0.5 now available

2010-11-22 Thread Xavier Maillard
Hi, I am quite late too but I just found time to upgrade from my old 0.3.1 version to this one and WOW ! The differences are really huge ! What I appreciate most at the moment: blasting performance which makes my SSD much much more happier ! I am not sure I understand what Fcc and I'd be happy s

notmuch-haskell

2010-09-23 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:53:22 -0700, Daniel Goldin wrote: > Using emacs 23.1.1, notmuch 3.1-59. Here is relevant code from .emacs: [ SNIP] > (require 'smtpmail) > (setq send-mail-function 'smtpmail-send-it) > (setq message-send-mail-function 'smtpmail-send-it) Is `smtpmail-send-it' able to queu

Re: notmuch-haskell

2010-09-23 Thread Xavier Maillard
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:53:22 -0700, Daniel Goldin wrote: > Using emacs 23.1.1, notmuch 3.1-59. Here is relevant code from .emacs: [ SNIP] > (require 'smtpmail) > (setq send-mail-function 'smtpmail-send-it) > (setq message-send-mail-function 'smtpmail-send-it) Is `smtpmail-send-it' able to queu

<    1   2   3   >