[PATCH] Don't bother checking for mbox files

2016-03-09 Thread Keith Packard
a config option to enable this behaviour, but I'd really rather not. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> --- lib/message-file.c | 29 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/message-file.c b/lib/message-file.c index ee30520..f

[PATCH] emacs: notmuch-hello: Add variable to control order or saved-search results

2014-02-07 Thread Keith Packard
Carl Worth writes: > This allows for the user to control the order that results are > returned from saved-searches, (and independently from the order of all > other searches which is controlled by notmuch-search-oldest-first). After we lost this from notmuch, I added this to my .emacs, which

Re: [PATCH] emacs: notmuch-hello: Add variable to control order or saved-search results

2014-02-07 Thread Keith Packard
Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org writes: This allows for the user to control the order that results are returned from saved-searches, (and independently from the order of all other searches which is controlled by notmuch-search-oldest-first). After we lost this from notmuch, I added this to my

Missing inlined message/rfc822 bodies?

2011-07-18 Thread Keith Packard
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:56:13 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > I'm curious if you're both solving the same problem. I would assume so; my patch simply kludges around the problem with a hack in the emacs code while jrollins is fixing the underlying gmime interactions. -- keith.packard at intel.com

Missing inlined message/rfc822 bodies?

2011-07-18 Thread Keith Packard
I wasn't seeing anything for an inlined message/rfc822 part (as with a forwarded email message) and discovered that for some reason, the message structure wasn't as expected. The following patch appears to help me. I'm still stuck trying to use the 'v' key to display attachments from forwarded

Missing inlined message/rfc822 bodies?

2011-07-18 Thread Keith Packard
I wasn't seeing anything for an inlined message/rfc822 part (as with a forwarded email message) and discovered that for some reason, the message structure wasn't as expected. The following patch appears to help me. I'm still stuck trying to use the 'v' key to display attachments from forwarded

Re: Missing inlined message/rfc822 bodies?

2011-07-18 Thread Keith Packard
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:56:13 -0300, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: I'm curious if you're both solving the same problem. I would assume so; my patch simply kludges around the problem with a hack in the emacs code while jrollins is fixing the underlying gmime interactions. --

branchs and tags and merges oh my!

2011-07-01 Thread Keith Packard
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:37:27 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > 1) repeat the whole thing with a new release branch for 0.7 and end up > with > > --.--.--- master >\ \ > - 0.6 --- 0.7 That's the 'usual' plan followed by

Printing mail

2010-11-09 Thread Keith Packard
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:32:01 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > which gives me nice menu entries for previewing my printouts (defaults > to 'gv' but can easily be set to use 'evince') and which provides the > M-x pr-ps-buffer-preview command to invoke the print preview directly > (unfortunately

Printing mail

2010-11-09 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:16:48 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > M-x ps-print buffer doesn't look too bad here and even copes with the > encoding better than the printout of your mail with muttprint had > looked. I like the header formatting. And, using evince provides a 'friendly' print dialog.

Printing mail

2010-11-09 Thread Keith Packard
Print is dead. Or so they say Here's a script I'm using with '|' to get mail printed. As you can see, it previews the mail on-screen with 'evince', from which you use the regular 'print' dialog. #!/bin/sh tmp=`mktemp` muttprint -p "TO_FILE:$tmp" evince $tmp rm $tmp Making this more secure

Printing mail

2010-11-09 Thread Keith Packard
Print is dead. Or so they say Here's a script I'm using with '|' to get mail printed. As you can see, it previews the mail on-screen with 'evince', from which you use the regular 'print' dialog. #!/bin/sh tmp=`mktemp` muttprint -p TO_FILE:$tmp evince $tmp rm $tmp Making this more secure would

Re: Printing mail

2010-11-09 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:16:48 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: M-x ps-print buffer doesn't look too bad here and even copes with the encoding better than the printout of your mail with muttprint had looked. I like the header formatting. And, using evince provides a

[PATCH] Customize saved search order separately from regular search order

2010-05-03 Thread Keith Packard
I use 'saved searches' as a folder mechanism and want them to be shown oldest first. Otherwise, while searching for messages normally, I want to see the most recent messages first. This patch makes these two default search orders separate. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- emacs/notmuch-hello.el

[PATCH] Customize saved search order separately from regular search order

2010-05-03 Thread Keith Packard
I use 'saved searches' as a folder mechanism and want them to be shown oldest first. Otherwise, while searching for messages normally, I want to see the most recent messages first. This patch makes these two default search orders separate. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com --- emacs

[notmuch] viewing text/html (inline or otherwise)

2010-02-09 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:22:56 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > I know that Keith is using a little script he wrote so that he can hit > '|' on a message and pipe it to his script. The script then uses a > utility, (munpack?) to extract all the various MIME parts to a temporary > directory and then run

Re: [notmuch] viewing text/html (inline or otherwise)

2010-02-09 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:22:56 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: I know that Keith is using a little script he wrote so that he can hit '|' on a message and pipe it to his script. The script then uses a utility, (munpack?) to extract all the various MIME parts to a temporary directory

[notmuch] [PATCH] Make the date parser nicer

2010-01-26 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:50:41 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:36:35 -0800, Keith Packard > wrote: > > Here's some code which further improves date parsing by allowing lots of > > date formats, including things like "today", &

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Make the date parser nicer

2010-01-26 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:50:41 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:36:35 -0800, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote: Here's some code which further improves date parsing by allowing lots of date formats, including things like today, thisweek, ISO and US

[notmuch] [PATCH] Make the date parser nicer

2010-01-25 Thread Keith Packard
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:26:11 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > Currently we have to enter mail dates as timestamps. This approach > does 2 things: it requires the prefix 'date:' and it allows timestamps > to be specified as , MM or MMDD. So a notmuch show > date:2005..20060512 will

[PATCH] Add date.c

2010-01-25 Thread Keith Packard
@@ +/* + * Copyright ? 2009 Keith Packard + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by + * the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or + * (at your option) any later version

[notmuch] [PATCH 3/3] Allow folders with no messages to be elided from list.

2009-12-26 Thread Keith Packard
This makes it easier to see folders with messages. Eliding empty folders is togged with the 'e' binding. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- lib/Makefile.local |1 + lib/notmuch.h | 11 +++ lib/query.cc | 41 + notmuch-new.c

[notmuch] [PATCH 2/3] Look at whitespace to separate folder name from count

2009-12-26 Thread Keith Packard
This allows folder names to contain any non-blank characters Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- notmuch.el |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/notmuch.el b/notmuch.el index 3dbb64a..c02adc6 100644 --- a/notmuch.el +++ b/notmuch.el @@ -1469,8 +1469,8

[notmuch] [PATCH 1/3] Add 'm' and ' ' bindings to notmuch-folder view

2009-12-26 Thread Keith Packard
This allows the user to compose new mail from the folder view, and also to use to show the current folder. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- notmuch.el |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/notmuch.el b/notmuch.el index 97914f2..3dbb64a 100644

[notmuch] [PATCH 3/3] Allow folders with no messages to be elided from list.

2009-12-26 Thread Keith Packard
This makes it easier to see folders with messages. Eliding empty folders is togged with the 'e' binding. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com --- lib/Makefile.local |1 + lib/notmuch.h | 11 +++ lib/query.cc | 41

[notmuch] keeping a copy of sent mail locally

2009-12-19 Thread Keith Packard
full-name "Alex Ghitza") > (setq user-mail-address "aghitza at gmail.com") You can set everything in the message-mail argument list: (message-mail nil nil '(("bcc" "keith.packard at intel.com") ("from" "Keith Packard "))) Alternat

[notmuch] keeping a copy of sent mail locally

2009-12-19 Thread Keith Packard
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:37:12 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > So we need to figure out how to configure (or hook) that > to insert the Bcc, and then we can fix notmuch.el to do this without any > user configuration. Just call: (message-mail nil nil '(("bcc" "keithp at keithp.com"))) instead of

Re: [notmuch] keeping a copy of sent mail locally

2009-12-19 Thread Keith Packard
-name Alex Ghitza) (setq user-mail-address aghi...@gmail.com) You can set everything in the message-mail argument list: (message-mail nil nil '((bcc keith.pack...@intel.com) (from Keith Packard keith.pack...@intel.com))) Alternatively, we can hack up message mode so that when the From address

[notmuch] [PATCH] More portable and easier to read regex in notmuch-search-operate-all

2009-11-28 Thread Keith Packard
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:51:13 +0100, Jed Brown wrote: > The former one worked in 23.1.50.1 but not in 23.1.1. > > Signed-off-by: Jed Brown Tested-by: Keith Packard -- keith.packard at intel.com -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] More portable and easier to read regex in notmuch-search-operate-all

2009-11-28 Thread Keith Packard
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:51:13 +0100, Jed Brown j...@59a2.org wrote: The former one worked in 23.1.50.1 but not in 23.1.1. Signed-off-by: Jed Brown j...@59a2.org Tested-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com -- keith.pack...@intel.com pgpA5aGfpQ9gu.pgp Description: PGP signature

[notmuch] _notmuch_message_create_for_message_id makes extra call to notmuch_database_find_message

2009-11-27 Thread Keith Packard
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:46:54 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > Did the "if" statement immediately afterwards just look like error > checking? It's not: Yes, it did (I think my brain may have auto-inserted a '!' there). Ok, having read the code a bit more carefully, this does look correct. I have to

Re: [notmuch] _notmuch_message_create_for_message_id makes extra call to notmuch_database_find_message

2009-11-27 Thread Keith Packard
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:46:54 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: Did the if statement immediately afterwards just look like error checking? It's not: Yes, it did (I think my brain may have auto-inserted a '!' there). Ok, having read the code a bit more carefully, this does look

[notmuch] OpenPGP support

2009-11-26 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:41:36 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > I'm not sure how to make sure that I also get that when doing a reply > within notmuch. Keith, I think you worked this out, right? What did you > do? ; sign messages by default (defun my-notmuch-message-mode-hook() (if

[notmuch] notmuch 'index' mode.

2009-11-24 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:14:07 +0100, Jan Janak wrote: > I like this. I think this is much cleaner than the "virtual tag" > approach. A disadvantage I see is that you would not see this 'virtual tags' in the list of tags on each message. And, we'd have to put the virtual tags in the .config file

[notmuch] notmuch 'index' mode.

2009-11-23 Thread Keith Packard
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:16:54 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > So what next for the user? We've got lots of empty space in the folder > view, so I think what I'd like is to provide some suggestions on search > strings to try, and then to make it obvious how to associate a name with > a search string.

[notmuch] _notmuch_message_create_for_message_id makes extra call to notmuch_database_find_message

2009-11-23 Thread Keith Packard
Looking at _notmuch_message_create_for_message_id, the first thing it does is call notmuch_database_find_message, but the returned 'message' is never used. I haven't tried, but I suspect this call could just be removed. -- keith.packard at intel.com -- next part -- A

[notmuch] [PATCH] Make search filters handle disjunctive queries.

2009-11-23 Thread Keith Packard
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:07:23 +0100, Jed Brown wrote: > notmuch-search-filter accepts now accepts an arbitrary query and will > group if necessary so that we get > > tag:inbox AND (gravy OR biscuits) > > notmuch-search-filter-tag now handles multiple terms. All terms in the > query except

[notmuch] [PATCH] ANSI escapes in "new" only when output is a tty

2009-11-22 Thread Keith Packard
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:12:09 +0100, Carl Worth wrote: > So that's totally broken and we should come up with a way to fix it. Tracking directory mtime instead of just looking at the read-only bit would let us skip directories that haven't seen any change in content. Tracking directory contents

[notmuch] [PATCH] Make notmuch-show 'X' (and 'x') commands remove inbox (and unread) tags

2009-11-22 Thread Keith Packard
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:31:04 +0100, Carl Worth wrote: > OK. You win. That looks pretty good to me. So we need to do the 'mark all that have been seen read' change, then we can do the rest of this switch. Not sure how to make that work, as we need to know what has been displayed, and you can

[notmuch] notmuch 'index' mode.

2009-11-22 Thread Keith Packard
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:06:06 +0100, Carl Worth wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:35:29 -0800, Keith Packard > wrote: > > I posted a patch adding an 'index' mode to notmuch and though I'd > > explain my idea. Most mail systems provide a 'folder view' mode which > > dis

[notmuch] [PATCH] Make notmuch-show 'X' (and 'x') commands remove inbox (and unread) tags

2009-11-22 Thread Keith Packard
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:03:12 +0100, Carl Worth wrote: > I agree that "normal" should be easier too. So I just need to win you > over to my notion of "normal", (and teach you of the ways of the magic > space bar). As I mentioned, I rarely read mail in a linear fashion; I don't want it to show me

[notmuch] [PATCH] Make notmuch-show 'X' (and 'x') commands remove inbox (and unread) tags

2009-11-22 Thread Keith Packard
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:19:29 +0100, Carl Worth wrote: > I'm starting to come around to this patch, Keith. :-) I'll keep posting it then :-) > I think one thing we're going to really need is a better help message > for presenting the keybindings. The function names are all really > confusing,

[notmuch] [PATCH 1/2] lib/message: Add function to get maildir flags.

2009-11-21 Thread Keith Packard
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:11:00 +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > +const char * > +notmuch_message_get_flags (notmuch_message_t *message) This function should interpret the flags that it finds and return a suitable set of notmuch tags. I'd suggest that 'unread' messages get both 'unread' and 'inbox'

[notmuch] Asynchronous tagging

2009-11-21 Thread Keith Packard
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:46:44 +0100, Carl Worth wrote: > So some investigation is needed to see how important that optimization > is, and if it's important to see whether there's another way to keep the > performance while being able to support renames. (Or alternately, > allowing the user to

[notmuch] [PATCH] Permit opening the notmuch database in read-only mode.

2009-11-21 Thread Keith Packard
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:54:25 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > +typedef enum { > +NOTMUCH_DATABASE_MODE_READONLY = 0, > +NOTMUCH_DATABASE_MODE_WRITABLE > +} notmuch_database_mode_t; Wondering if MODE_READWRITE would be more descriptive? -- keith.packard at intel.com -- next

[notmuch] [PATCH] Add notmuch-folder mode to provide an overview of search matches

2009-11-21 Thread Keith Packard
contains the name of the folder and the query string to count. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- notmuch.el | 81 1 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/notmuch.el b/notmuch.el index 4f369de..7cab3c1 100644

[notmuch] notmuch 'index' mode.

2009-11-20 Thread Keith Packard
I posted a patch adding an 'index' mode to notmuch and though I'd explain my idea. Most mail systems provide a 'folder view' mode which displays the set of folders and a count of messages in each folder. I used this myself as the first sort of which messages I want to read. Notmuch doesn't have

[notmuch] [PATCH 3/3] Add notmuch-index mode to display message counts

2009-11-20 Thread Keith Packard
the name of the index and the query string to count. This provides a view similar to a folder list in a more traditional mail client. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- notmuch.el | 81 1 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 0 deletions

[notmuch] [PATCH 2/3] Add 'notmuch count' command to show the count of matching messages

2009-11-20 Thread Keith Packard
-by: Keith Packard --- Makefile.local |1 + lib/notmuch.h|8 lib/query.cc | 52 ++ notmuch-client.h |3 + notmuch-count.c | 109 ++ notmuch.c| 11 + 6 files changed, 184 insertions

[notmuch] [PATCH 1/3] Make mouse-1 click in search view show thread

2009-11-20 Thread Keith Packard
Selecting text in the search view isn't all that useful, so instead, make mouse-1 clicks actually show the thread you click on. It's almost like direct manipulation or something. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- notmuch.el |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

[notmuch] [PATCH] Insert signature into replies

2009-11-20 Thread Keith Packard
When you compose a new message, message mode carefully inserts your mail signature at the bottom of the message; as notmuch constructs the reply all by itself, this doesn't happen then. Use the message mode function 'message-insert-signature' to add that to reply buffers. Signed-off-by: Keith

[notmuch] [PATCH] Make notmuch-show 'X' (and 'x') commands remove inbox (and unread) tags

2009-11-20 Thread Keith Packard
essage, it takes you back to the search window instead. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- notmuch.el | 86 ++- 1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) This adds new functionality without removing any; without this patch, the 'x'

[notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch: improve installation of emacs mode

2009-11-19 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:18:50 -0600, "Jeffrey C. Ollie" wrote: > 1) Don't hardcode the installation directory, instead use emacs' >pkg-config module. > > 2) Install a byte compiled version of the emacs mode. yes, both of these seem reasonable > 3) Install the emacs mode in emacs'

[notmuch] [PATCH -V3] notmuch: Add search mode hook

2009-11-19 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:40:54 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote: > This patch add notmuch-search-hook that gets run when we > after displaying search results Looks good. > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V Reviewed-by: Keith Packard -- keith.packard at intel.com -

[notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch: Add search mode hook

2009-11-18 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:25:37 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote: > This patch add notmuch-search-mode-hook and rename > notmuch-show-hook to notmuch-show-mode-hook. This > also runs notmuch-show-mode-hook when we enable > notmuch-show-mode I'm not sure we want to run the hooks that early; I can

[notmuch] [PATCH] Handle rename of message file

2009-11-18 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:11:12 +0600, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > > Twas brillig at 18:06:09 18.11.2009 UTC-08 when keithp at keithp.com did gyre > and gimble: > > KP> Checking for new files is easy; notmuch already does that, and so > KP> handling renames doesn't seem all that difficult. > >

[notmuch] [PATCH] Handle rename of message file

2009-11-18 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:08:15 +0100, Carl Worth wrote: > I'd love to hear more from you on any experiments/ideas you have in this > area. It would be a really nice feature to have, (particularly for > people who are experimenting with notmuch while still using some other > primary email program

[notmuch] [PATCH] Make notmuch-show 'X' (and 'x') commands remove inbox (and unread) tags

2009-11-18 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:25:34 +0100, Carl Worth wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:45:01 -0800, Keith Packard > wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:19:26 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > > You can use kill-buffer directly (C-X k); adding a new special binding > > for that command

[notmuch] [PATCH] Make reply/show/tag all require at least one search term

2009-11-18 Thread Keith Packard
In particular, notmuch tag -inbox "" tended to take a long time to run, happened if you hit 'a' on a blank line in the search view and probably didn't have the desired effect. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- notmuch-reply.c | 13 + notmuch-show.c | 13 +---

[notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch: Add tag archive when archiving the mails

2009-11-18 Thread Keith Packard
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:50:58 -0600, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > That resulted in an error for me: > > $ notmuch search not tag:inbox > A Xapian exception occurred: Syntax: NOT > A Xapian exception occurred: Syntax: NOT Yeah, NOT isn't a unary operator in xapian; it's a binary operator that

[notmuch] [PATCH] Have git ignore etags file

2009-11-18 Thread Keith Packard
--- .gitignore |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index d277c5a..367caa6 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +TAGS .deps notmuch notmuch.1.gz -- 1.6.5.2

[notmuch] [PATCH] Limit reverse searches to 100 threads.

2009-11-18 Thread Keith Packard
Yes, this is a lame default, but it serves my purposes. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- notmuch.el |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/notmuch.el b/notmuch.el index 4498200..91ed073 100644 --- a/notmuch.el +++ b/notmuch.el @@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ This function

[notmuch] [PATCH] Filter out carriage-returns in show and reply output.

2009-11-18 Thread Keith Packard
Thanks, windows mail clients. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- gmime-filter-reply.c |7 --- notmuch-show.c | 21 +++-- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/gmime-filter-reply.c b/gmime-filter-reply.c index 3e298e1..b269db4 100644

[notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch: Add tag archive when archiving the mails

2009-11-18 Thread Keith Packard
> This enables us to search for archived mails later I think you can just use 'not tag:inbox' as 'archived' really just means 'doesn't have the inbox tag'. -- keith.packard at intel.com -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:

[notmuch] [PATCH] Make notmuch-show 'X' (and 'x') commands remove inbox (and unread) tags

2009-11-18 Thread Keith Packard
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:19:26 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > I don't like this---but that's because I use 'x' precisely *because* it > preserves these tags. You can use kill-buffer directly (C-X k); adding a new special binding for that command seems unnecessary to me. > Otherwise, you might as

[notmuch] [PATCH] We use the message mail system for new mail, let emacs know.

2009-11-18 Thread Keith Packard
This makes things like the goto-address system bring up the right message composition window. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- notmuch.el |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/notmuch.el b/notmuch.el index c95cb43..4498200 100644 --- a/notmuch.el +++ b

[notmuch] [PATCH] Create a default notmuch-show-hook that highlights URLs and uses word-wrap

2009-11-18 Thread Keith Packard
I created the notmuch-show-hook precisely so I could add these two options, but I suspect most people will want them, so I just made them the default. If you don't want them, you can use remove-hook to get rid of this. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- notmuch.el |8 1 files changed

[notmuch] archive

2009-11-17 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:21:38 -0500, Aron Griffis wrote: > Just subscribed, I'd like to catch up on the previous postings, > but the archive link seems to be bogus? Yeah, the archive appears broken and will need to wait until Carl arrives in Barcelona to get fixed. -- keith.packard at intel.com

[notmuch] Introducing myself

2009-11-17 Thread Keith Packard
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:20:59 +0100, Adrian Perez de Castro wrote: > Some time ago I thought > about doing something like Not Much and in fact I played a bit with the > Python+Xapian and the Python+Whoosh combinations, because I find relaxing > to code things in Python when I am not working and

[notmuch] New to the list

2009-11-17 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:57:18 +0100, Israel Herraiz wrote: > "Not much" sounds interesting, and I wonder whether it could be > integrated with the views of Sup (inbox, threads, etc). So I have > subscribed to the list to keep an eye on what's going on here. We've tried to clone much of the sup

[notmuch] [PATCH] Make notmuch-show 'X' (and 'x') commands remove inbox (and unread) tags

2009-11-17 Thread Keith Packard
essage, it takes you back to the search window instead. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- notmuch.el | 86 ++- 1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/notmuch.el b/notmuch.el index 638d49d..7b0d72c 100644 --

[notmuch] Working with Maildir storage?

2009-11-17 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:33:01 -0500, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > > See the patch just posted here. I've also pushed a slightly more complicated (and complete) fix to my private notmuch repository git://keithp.com/git/notmuch > Is the list archived anywhere? Oops. Looks like Carl's mail

[notmuch] [PATCH 1/2] Close message file after parsing message headers

2009-11-17 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:13:27 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > I didn't apply Keith's fix yet, because I think I'd rather just fix the > indexer to store the In-Reply-To header in a separate term prefix from > the term used for the References header[*]. That will then let us lookup > the in-reply-to