On 2014-09-01 09:41:06, Perttu Luukko wrote:
> Yes, that indeed works. I'll probably move these ignored files to a
> separate folder for inspection.
I looked at the mails that are still ignored after upgrading GMime to
latest version, and I think I have found what they have in common
On 2014-09-03 19:03:40, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2014, Perttu Luukko wrote:
> > What I mean that there would be a separate error for cases "Does not
> > resemble an email message at all", i.e., some control file your mail
> > server happens to store in th
On 2014-09-01 09:41:06, Perttu Luukko wrote:
> Yes, that indeed works. I'll probably move these ignored files to a
> separate folder for inspection.
I looked at the mails that are still ignored after upgrading GMime to
latest version, and I think I have found what they have in common
On 2014-09-03 19:03:40, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2014, Perttu Luukko wrote:
> > What I mean that there would be a separate error for cases "Does not
> > resemble an email message at all", i.e., some control file your mail
> > server happens to store in th
On 2014-09-02 23:37:12, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Sep 2014, Perttu Luukko wrote:
> > Yes, upgrading to GMime 2.6.20 caused all the messages on my server
> > classified as mail.
>
> What was the old version? If it was 2.4 we should probably consider
> dropping su
On 2014-09-02 23:37:12, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Sep 2014, Perttu Luukko wrote:
> > Yes, upgrading to GMime 2.6.20 caused all the messages on my server
> > classified as mail.
>
> What was the old version? If it was 2.4 we should probably consider
> dropping su
On 2014-09-01 09:52:20, Perttu Luukko wrote:
> If the files really are ignored because of GMime it also explains why so
> much more files are ignored on my mail provider's server than on my
> laptop. The server probably has an older version of GMime. I'll upgrade
> a
On 2014-08-31 07:41:42, David Bremner wrote:
> Perttu Luukko writes:
> > The vast majority of these ignored mails are not ignored after I
> > transfer them with offlineimap to another computer. I can non-ignore
> > these files probably by copying the renamed file back to th
On 2014-08-31 09:46:12, David Bremner wrote:
> Perttu Luukko writes:
>
> > I understand that the list of non-mail files is stored in the
> > notmuch database and the files are completely ignored from there on.
> > This actually makes it harder to debug these kind of issu
On 2014-09-01 09:52:20, Perttu Luukko wrote:
> If the files really are ignored because of GMime it also explains why so
> much more files are ignored on my mail provider's server than on my
> laptop. The server probably has an older version of GMime. I'll upgrade
> a
On 2014-08-31 07:41:42, David Bremner wrote:
> Perttu Luukko writes:
> > The vast majority of these ignored mails are not ignored after I
> > transfer them with offlineimap to another computer. I can non-ignore
> > these files probably by copying the renamed file back to th
On 2014-08-31 09:46:12, David Bremner wrote:
> Perttu Luukko writes:
>
> > I understand that the list of non-mail files is stored in the
> > notmuch database and the files are completely ignored from there on.
> > This actually makes it harder to debug these kind of issu
Maybe 'notmuch new'
could have some kind of --unignore-non-mail switch that would reconsider
previously ignored files.
--
Perttu Luukko
Maybe 'notmuch new'
could have some kind of --unignore-non-mail switch that would reconsider
previously ignored files.
--
Perttu Luukko
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On 2014-08-26 13:01:22, David Bremner wrote:
> Perttu Luukko writes:
> > When I run 'notmuch new' I get:
> >
> > Found 9903 total files (that's not much mail).
> > Error reading file /home/users/(username)/Maildir/.act/.act: No such
> >
On 2014-08-26 13:01:22, David Bremner wrote:
> Perttu Luukko writes:
> > When I run 'notmuch new' I get:
> >
> > Found 9903 total files (that's not much mail).
> > Error reading file /home/users/(username)/Maildir/.act/.act: No such
> >
'd to my local
computer and with a more plain layout (each folder as a subdirectory of
~/mail, no dots) is read without problems.
What could be going wrong here? Is this a layout that should be indexed
by notmuch?
Please note that I'm not subscribed to this mailing list
'd to my local
computer and with a more plain layout (each folder as a subdirectory of
~/mail, no dots) is read without problems.
What could be going wrong here? Is this a layout that should be indexed
by notmuch?
Please note that I'm not subscribed to this mailing list -- I'm not
using notmuch yet so I can't handle the volume :)
--
Perttu Luukko
18 matches
Mail list logo