also sprach Carl Worth [2010.02.24.2008 +0100]:
> I agree that in its current form it's not useful, (it seems to be just a
> long list of the patches that have ever been submitted).
>
> I seem to recall Martin saying that patches that get accepted will be
> automatically detected and removed from
also sprach Carl Worth [2010.02.24.2008 +0100]:
> I agree that in its current form it's not useful, (it seems to be just a
> long list of the patches that have ever been submitted).
>
> I seem to recall Martin saying that patches that get accepted will be
> automatically detected and removed from
also sprach Carl Worth [2010.02.24.2010 +0100]:
> > Carl, would you consider bouncing messages to addresses like
> > patchwork+rejected at patchwork.notmuchmail.org? That would make it
> > trivial for me to write glue to update patchwork automatically.
>
> Now you're talking my language, Martin!
also sprach Carl Worth [2010.02.24.2010 +0100]:
> > Carl, would you consider bouncing messages to addresses like
> > patchwork+rejec...@patchwork.notmuchmail.org? That would make it
> > trivial for me to write glue to update patchwork automatically.
>
> Now you're talking my language, Martin!
>
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:22:16 +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> Carl, would you consider bouncing messages to addresses like
> patchwork+rejec...@patchwork.notmuchmail.org? That would make it
> trivial for me to write glue to update patchwork automatically.
Now you're talking my language, Martin!
I
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:22:16 +1300, martin f krafft
wrote:
> Carl, would you consider bouncing messages to addresses like
> patchwork+rejected at patchwork.notmuchmail.org? That would make it
> trivial for me to write glue to update patchwork automatically.
Now you're talking my language, Martin
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:25:49 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth"
wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:25:03 +1300, martin f krafft
> wrote:
> > > http://patchwork.madduck.net/project/notmuch/list/ now exists.
And even as http://patchwork.notmuchmail.org now.
> As long as patches aren't being marked as "reje
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:25:49 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:25:03 +1300, martin f krafft
> wrote:
> > > http://patchwork.madduck.net/project/notmuch/list/ now exists.
And even as http://patchwork.notmuchmail.org now.
> As long as patches aren't being marked as "rejec
also sprach Sebastian Spaeth [2010.02.10.2225 +1300]:
> "notmuch dump tag:notmuch and tag:patch" could be used to construct a
> list of "accepted", "willnottakeit","superseded" and "pending" lists or
> whatever. If that list were made accessible somewhere, this would be
> super useful. At least it
also sprach David Bremner [2010.02.10.2149 +1300]:
> I'm not sure what merging patches means here; some kind of squash
> operation? Anyway it seemed to me that every every patch series
> that I looked at was broken into individual patches. Maybe I am
> just unlucky, or does patchwork really not u
also sprach martin f krafft [2010.02.02.1131 +1300]:
> I investigated some patch/issue trackers over the weekend. Here's my
> summary/reply.
>
> The executive summary is that
> http://patchwork.madduck.net/project/notmuch/list/ now exists.
> I have not really used it for anything real, so if some
also sprach Sebastian Spaeth [2010.02.10.2225 +1300]:
> "notmuch dump tag:notmuch and tag:patch" could be used to construct a
> list of "accepted", "willnottakeit","superseded" and "pending" lists or
> whatever. If that list were made accessible somewhere, this would be
> super useful. At least it
also sprach David Bremner [2010.02.10.2149 +1300]:
> I'm not sure what merging patches means here; some kind of squash
> operation? Anyway it seemed to me that every every patch series
> that I looked at was broken into individual patches. Maybe I am
> just unlucky, or does patchwork really not u
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:25:03 +1300, martin f krafft
wrote:
> > http://patchwork.madduck.net/project/notmuch/list/ now exists.
>
> Are people actually using it? I know that merging patches is
> impossible, and that sucks, but otherwise: is this something to keep
> around, or should I take the sit
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:25:03 +1300, martin f krafft
wrote:
>
> Are people actually using it? I know that merging patches is
> impossible, and that sucks, but otherwise: is this something to keep
> around, or should I take the site offline again?
I'm not sure what merging patches means here; som
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:25:03 +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> > http://patchwork.madduck.net/project/notmuch/list/ now exists.
>
> Are people actually using it? I know that merging patches is
> impossible, and that sucks, but otherwise: is this something to keep
> around, or should I take the site
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:25:03 +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> Are people actually using it? I know that merging patches is
> impossible, and that sucks, but otherwise: is this something to keep
> around, or should I take the site offline again?
I'm not sure what merging patches means here; some
also sprach martin f krafft [2010.02.02.1131 +1300]:
> I investigated some patch/issue trackers over the weekend. Here's my
> summary/reply.
>
> The executive summary is that
> http://patchwork.madduck.net/project/notmuch/list/ now exists.
> I have not really used it for anything real, so if some
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:31:12 +1300, martin f krafft
wrote:
> Arguably, being patch-centric means that a project has a higher
> barrier of entry, but it also means that if someone wants something,
> they know that they'll have to somehow end up with a patch. The way
> this happens on Git is that yo
I investigated some patch/issue trackers over the weekend. Here's my
summary/reply.
The executive summary is that
http://patchwork.madduck.net/project/notmuch/list/ now exists.
I have not really used it for anything real, so if some of you feel
inclined to give it a shot, sign up and triage away!
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:31:12 +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> Arguably, being patch-centric means that a project has a higher
> barrier of entry, but it also means that if someone wants something,
> they know that they'll have to somehow end up with a patch. The way
> this happens on Git is that you
I investigated some patch/issue trackers over the weekend. Here's my
summary/reply.
The executive summary is that
http://patchwork.madduck.net/project/notmuch/list/ now exists.
I have not really used it for anything real, so if some of you feel
inclined to give it a shot, sign up and triage away!
22 matches
Mail list logo