On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:39:38PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
> More information:
>
> https://github.com/karelzak/mutt-kz/wiki
>
> https://raw.github.com/karelzak/mutt-kz/master/README.notmuch
We have mailing list now:
h
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:39:38PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
> More information:
>
> https://github.com/karelzak/mutt-kz/wiki
>
> https://raw.github.com/karelzak/mutt-kz/master/README.notmuch
We have mailing list now:
h
FWIW, here's the patch I ended up using to play with this:
diff --git a/mutt_notmuch.c b/mutt_notmuch.c
index 2f21407..a07b1ba 100644
--- a/mutt_notmuch.c
+++ b/mutt_notmuch.c
@@ -636,11 +636,15 @@ char *nm_uri_from_query(CONTEXT *ctx, char *buf,
size_t bufsz)
static notmuch_message_t *get_nm_mes
FWIW, here's the patch I ended up using to play with this:
diff --git a/mutt_notmuch.c b/mutt_notmuch.c
index 2f21407..a07b1ba 100644
--- a/mutt_notmuch.c
+++ b/mutt_notmuch.c
@@ -636,11 +636,15 @@ char *nm_uri_from_query(CONTEXT *ctx, char *buf,
size_t bufsz)
?static notmuch_message_t *get_nm_mes
On Jan 04, 2012 at 10:07 AM -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
>Hey, Karel. I know there are a lot of people out here that are
>interested in playing with mutt-kz. However, notmuch 0.5 is really old
>and is unfortunately an API version ago. Until we can get notmuch
>working with gmime 2.6, and
On Jan 04, 2012 at 10:07 AM -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
Hey, Karel. I know there are a lot of people out here that are
interested in playing with mutt-kz. However, notmuch 0.5 is really old
and is unfortunately an API version ago. Until we can get notmuch
working with gmime 2.6, and ge
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:59:51 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> > I had to tweak your use of notmuch_database_find_message (I'm using
> > 0.11_rc2) but otherwise it compiles fine.
>
> Unfortunately, the latest package for Fedora is notmuch-0.5-4.fc15 ;-(
>
> But I'm ready to accept patches to make it comp
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:59:51 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> > I had to tweak your use of notmuch_database_find_message (I'm using
> > 0.11_rc2) but otherwise it compiles fine.
>
> Unfortunately, the latest package for Fedora is notmuch-0.5-4.fc15 ;-(
>
> But I'm ready to accept patches to make it comp
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:39:38 +0100
Karel Zak wrote:
>
> This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
>
> I have forked mutt to seriously integrate notmuch to this excellent
> e-mail client. I don't want to use symlinks or any other hacks to
> emulate virtual folders. My wis
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:17:04 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:59:51 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> > Unfortunately, the latest package for Fedora is notmuch-0.5-4.fc15 ;-(
>
> Yikes that's old (0.11 is being released eminently). There have been
> quite a few important chan
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:59:51 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> Unfortunately, the latest package for Fedora is notmuch-0.5-4.fc15 ;-(
Take a look at id:"8762i8hrb9.fsf at bookbinder.fernseed.info". There is a
gmime patch which still applies cleanly to everything up to the current
git head and which will
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 06:45:46PM +, Darren McGuicken wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:39:38PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> > This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
>
> Outstanding! Assuming this mail makes it to the list, I can confirm
> that it works well for me
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:39:38 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
>
> I have forked mutt to seriously integrate notmuch to this excellent e-mail
> client. I don't want to use symlinks or any other hacks to emulate virtual
> folders. My wi
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:39:38PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
Outstanding! Assuming this mail makes it to the list, I can confirm that it
works well for me! Although I will have to find and dust off an old .muttrc...
I had to tw
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:39:38 +0100
Karel Zak wrote:
>
> This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
>
> I have forked mutt to seriously integrate notmuch to this excellent
> e-mail client. I don't want to use symlinks or any other hacks to
> emulate virtual folders. My wis
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:17:04 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:59:51 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> > Unfortunately, the latest package for Fedora is notmuch-0.5-4.fc15 ;-(
>
> Yikes that's old (0.11 is being released eminently). There have been
> quite a few important cha
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:59:51 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> Unfortunately, the latest package for Fedora is notmuch-0.5-4.fc15 ;-(
Take a look at id:"8762i8hrb9@bookbinder.fernseed.info". There is a
gmime patch which still applies cleanly to everything up to the current
git head and which will let
This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
I have forked mutt to seriously integrate notmuch to this excellent e-mail
client. I don't want to use symlinks or any other hacks to emulate virtual
folders. My wish is mutt linked with libnotmuch.
Features:
* in .muttrc defin
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:59:51 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> Unfortunately, the latest package for Fedora is notmuch-0.5-4.fc15 ;-(
Yikes that's old (0.11 is being released eminently). There have been
quite a few important changes since then. Is there no one actively
maintaining the fedora package? O
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:59:51 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> Unfortunately, the latest package for Fedora is notmuch-0.5-4.fc15 ;-(
Yikes that's old (0.11 is being released eminently). There have been
quite a few important changes since then. Is there no one actively
maintaining the fedora package? O
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 06:45:46PM +, Darren McGuicken wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:39:38PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> > This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
>
> Outstanding! Assuming this mail makes it to the list, I can confirm
> that it works well for me
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:39:38PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
Outstanding! Assuming this mail makes it to the list, I can confirm that it
works well for me! Although I will have to find and dust off an old .muttrc...
I had to tw
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:39:38 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
>
> I have forked mutt to seriously integrate notmuch to this excellent e-mail
> client. I don't want to use symlinks or any other hacks to emulate virtual
> folders. My wi
On Jan 03, 2012 at 01:39 PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
>
>This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
>
>I have forked mutt to seriously integrate notmuch to this excellent e-mail
>client. I don't want to use symlinks or any other hacks to emulate virtual
>folders. My wish is mu
On Jan 03, 2012 at 01:39 PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
I have forked mutt to seriously integrate notmuch to this excellent e-mail
client. I don't want to use symlinks or any other hacks to emulate virtual
folders. My wish is mutt l
This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-)
I have forked mutt to seriously integrate notmuch to this excellent e-mail
client. I don't want to use symlinks or any other hacks to emulate virtual
folders. My wish is mutt linked with libnotmuch.
Features:
* in .muttrc defin
26 matches
Mail list logo