On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:43:35 -0500, David Bremner wrote:
> Just confirm, all the crypto tests pass with this patch? In that case,
> can we have the patch (preferably as generated by git-send-email)? Or
> did I miss it somewhere in this thread?
I don't believe the patch ever made it to the list, I
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 21:45:20 +, Darren McGuicken wrote:
> Hi guys, I assume this is old news, although I haven't seen anything
> else mentioned on list since the chain Dirk started - there's a koji
> build of 0.9 for rawhide, the source rpm of which contains a gmime 2.6
> patch. I recently mo
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:43:35 -0500, David Bremner wrote:
> Just confirm, all the crypto tests pass with this patch? In that case,
> can we have the patch (preferably as generated by git-send-email)? Or
> did I miss it somewhere in this thread?
I don't believe the patch ever made it to the list, I
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 21:45:20 +, Darren McGuicken
wrote:
> Hi guys, I assume this is old news, although I haven't seen anything
> else mentioned on list since the chain Dirk started - there's a koji
> build of 0.9 for rawhide, the source rpm of which contains a gmime 2.6
> patch. I recently m
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:55:16 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 05:35:29 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
> > This used to work and used to be supported and was broken in a
> > recent notmuch patch.
>
> If you don't have access to gmime 2.4, then maybe you could look into
> pr
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:55:16 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 05:35:29 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
> > This used to work and used to be supported and was broken in a
> > recent notmuch patch.
>
> If you don't have access to gmime 2.4, then maybe you could look into
> p
I got the following response off-list from the gmime lead, which he's ok
with my re-posting here:
On 06/02/2011 08:53 AM, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> I don't know why Fedora 15 ships 2.5.x, that seems like a really silly
> thing to do. I think I recall the Balsa guys bringing this up in the
> past a
I got the following response off-list from the gmime lead, which he's ok
with my re-posting here:
On 06/02/2011 08:53 AM, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> I don't know why Fedora 15 ships 2.5.x, that seems like a really silly
> thing to do. I think I recall the Balsa guys bringing this up in the
> past a
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 05:35:29 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> This used to work and used to be supported and was broken in a recent
> notmuch patch.
Hey, Dirk. I would actually say that support for gmime 2.6 was merely
coincidental up until now. For all functionality we had been using, the
API in 2
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 05:35:29 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
wrote:
> This used to work and used to be supported and was broken in a recent
> notmuch patch.
Hey, Dirk. I would actually say that support for gmime 2.6 was merely
coincidental up until now. For all functionality we had been using, the
API in
On Tue, 31 May 2011 12:29:28 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
> i'm CC'ing the upstream lead developer of gmime here to see if he has
> any thoughts (and can correct any misrepresentations from me) -- Hi Jeffrey!
>
> On 05/30/2011 02:43 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins
On Tue, 31 May 2011 12:29:28 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
> i'm CC'ing the upstream lead developer of gmime here to see if he has
> any thoughts (and can correct any misrepresentations from me) -- Hi Jeffrey!
>
> On 05/30/2011 02:43 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins w
i'm CC'ing the upstream lead developer of gmime here to see if he has
any thoughts (and can correct any misrepresentations from me) -- Hi Jeffrey!
On 05/30/2011 02:43 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Sun, 29 May 2011 11:44:05 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
>> CC -O2 notmuch-reply.o
>> notmuch
i'm CC'ing the upstream lead developer of gmime here to see if he has
any thoughts (and can correct any misrepresentations from me) -- Hi Jeffrey!
On 05/30/2011 02:43 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Sun, 29 May 2011 11:44:05 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
> wrote:
>> CC -O2 notmuch-reply.o
>> notmuch
On Sun, 29 May 2011 11:44:05 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> CC -O2 notmuch-reply.o
> notmuch-reply.c: In function ‘notmuch_reply_command’:
> notmuch-reply.c:658:3: error: unknown type name ‘GMimeSession’
> notmuch-reply.c:659:3: warning: passing argument 1 of
> ‘g_mime_gpg_context_new’ from incompa
On Sun, 29 May 2011 11:44:05 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
wrote:
> CC -O2 notmuch-reply.o
> notmuch-reply.c: In function ?notmuch_reply_command?:
> notmuch-reply.c:658:3: error: unknown type name ?GMimeSession?
> notmuch-reply.c:659:3: warning: passing argument 1 of
> ?g_mime_gpg_context_new? from incomp
CC -O2 notmuch-reply.o
notmuch-reply.c: In function ‘notmuch_reply_command’:
notmuch-reply.c:658:3: error: unknown type name ‘GMimeSession’
notmuch-reply.c:659:3: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘g_mime_gpg_context_new’
from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
/usr/include/gmime-2.6/gmi
CC -O2 notmuch-reply.o
notmuch-reply.c: In function ?notmuch_reply_command?:
notmuch-reply.c:658:3: error: unknown type name ?GMimeSession?
notmuch-reply.c:659:3: warning: passing argument 1 of ?g_mime_gpg_context_new?
from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
/usr/include/gmime-2.6/gmi
18 matches
Mail list logo
