Re: [NoXMail] Moving back to the queue

2003-01-03 Thread Tito Macapinlac
Hi John, Yes, I want to know how to integrate Cybersitter with Declude. Thanks, Tito - Original Message - From: "John Tolmachoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 4:01 PM Subject: RE: [NoXMail] Moving back to the queue > Other people use No-X-Ma

RE: [NoXMail] Moving back to the queue

2003-01-03 Thread John Tolmachoff
> Other people use No-X-Mail simply as an external test and let Declude take > care of the holding, warning, etc. If this is more what you are looking to do, > I can get some recommended settings for doing this. Actually, there is another > user here (hey John!) that probably can give you better ad

Re: [NoXMail] Moving back to the queue

2003-01-03 Thread Brian Milburn
Hi Tito, On 01/03/03 3:29pm you wrote... >Hi Brian, >I've just installed the software and it looks like it is working pretty good >and I starting to understand how it works. Several questions though: > >1. how do I bring back to the queue a quarantined (held) message? You can't. Only the user

[NoXMail] Moving back to the queue

2003-01-03 Thread Tito Macapinlac
Hi Brian, BTW, Thanks for allowing me to beta-test NoXMail. I've just installed the software and it looks like it is working pretty good and I starting to understand how it works. Several questions though: 1. how do I bring back to the queue a quarantined (held) message? 2. how do I know wheth

RE: [NoXMail] Update for Declude +- test

2003-01-03 Thread John Tolmachoff
Thanks for the clarification Scott. Too much work this week and not enough egg nog. :( John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com ft.com --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] Archives: ht

RE: [NoXMail] Update for Declude +- test

2003-01-03 Thread Brian Milburn
Ah yes, the old "Microsoft didn't tell us the correct stuff" ploy. I know it well ;-) Thanks Scott. On 01/03/03 6:13pm you wrote... > >>Brian, I am not sure that Scott said he had the positive/negative ready >yet. > >This is the first I've heard of an issue with negative return values. > >Howev

RE: [NoXMail] Update for Declude +- test

2003-01-03 Thread John Tolmachoff
> I checked with him yesterday and he said this interim release should handle > it. However, I was not able to get it to work properly. Maybe I am doing > something wrong and hopefully Scott will enlighten me :-) OK. I will try to look at it later or tomorrow. I just got done doing a third party

RE: [NoXMail] Update for Declude +- test

2003-01-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
Brian, I am not sure that Scott said he had the positive/negative ready yet. This is the first I've heard of an issue with negative return values. However, it appears there was a glitch in the code (thanks to Microsoft reporting that the exit code should be an unsigned long, rather than a si

RE: [NoXMail] Update for Declude +- test

2003-01-03 Thread Brian Milburn
I checked with him yesterday and he said this interim release should handle it. However, I was not able to get it to work properly. Maybe I am doing something wrong and hopefully Scott will enlighten me :-) Brian On 01/03/03 2:54pm you wrote... >Brian, I am not sure that Scott said he had the p

RE: [NoXMail] Update for Declude +- test

2003-01-03 Thread John Tolmachoff
Brian, I am not sure that Scott said he had the positive/negative ready yet. Scott? John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:NoX-List- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]]

[NoXMail] Update for Declude +- test

2003-01-03 Thread Brian Milburn
Hi Guys, especially John, I enabled the positive/negative testing for Declude. http://www.noxmail.com/imail/noxbeta.zip This must use http://www.declude.com/release/165i/declude.exe (interim release) or newer. To use the No-X-Mail test this way you will need to add DECLUDETESTONLY TRUE to th

Re: [NoXMail] valid Lic key

2003-01-03 Thread Brian Milburn
Here is the current beta lic key. 4D7A63324E54493D On 01/03/03 10:51am you wrote... >Looking for purchase info OR for a valid BETA Version LICENSE SERIAL >Number. > >Greg Hedgepath >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.CFHosting.net/ > >ICQ#: 290276 | AIM: colFu >Yahoo: cfhosting >msn: [EMAIL PROT

[NoXMail] valid Lic key

2003-01-03 Thread hostmaster
Looking for purchase info OR for a valid BETA Version LICENSE SERIAL Number. Greg Hedgepath [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.CFHosting.net/ ICQ#: 290276 | AIM: colFu Yahoo: cfhosting msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [This E-mail scanned for viruses by declude AntiVirus Software] ware] --- [This E-m

Re: [NoXMail] FW: No-X-Mail Report

2003-01-03 Thread Brian Milburn
%Inc = Percent of Incoming messages %Fld = Percent of Failed messages I am going to play with the formatting and see if we can fit the full description in without getting wordwrapped and messing up the format. On 01/03/03 7:17am you wrote... >Brian, what is the %Inc and %Fld columns? > >John

[NoXMail] Minor update posted

2003-01-03 Thread Brian Milburn
Hi everyone, I discovered late yesterday as we were adding some complex patterns to the pattern files that under certain conditions, conditional definitions were not being checked if they contained more than 2 optional sections. In other words, some of the more complicated complex patterns might

[NoXMail] FW: No-X-Mail Report

2003-01-03 Thread John Tolmachoff
Brian, what is the %Inc and %Fld columns? John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com > -Original Message- > From: No-X-Mail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 12:05 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTE