Re: [NPanday] Server Repo Problem
Hi Brett, you got it right, i think :-) If Archiva does the job, ok! Hudson is defenitely a good choice. It works good with maven. I can help naming the things to be setup for the build. Or would we get access to the build servers ourselves? The easiest would defeniteley be to install Visual Studio 2005/2008/2010 on the boxes, though. Maybe they have that already? - Lars Am 18.01.11 05:00, schrieb Brett Porter: Let me understand if I got this right... For the release we need a repo obviously - and since we are already using Archiva, it has specific NPanday support, and I'm willing to do the work - we're trying that. If we have any problems we could try the Nexus install instead. Lars, and others that preferred Nexus - are you ok with that, or do you specifically want to use Nexus on repository.apache.org for some other reason? For the CI, we should do that but it's separate from the release. We have a Windows box running Continuum now but it's better to use the Apache infrastructure. Since there are already Hudson windows slaves and a lot of people liked that option we're trying that. We'll probably need them to install the Windows SDK for testing, so someone will need to volunteer to help with that. If we get stuck we could investigate Continuum, but again we'd need to do the work to set up the agents& VMs. Is that right? Any objections? - Brett On 18/01/2011, at 2:31 PM, Adelita Padilla wrote: Wrapping things up, we have the ff results: * Repository - ARCHIVA * CI - CONTINUUM/HUDSON Please refer to the new thread: [NPanday] TO DO List before Release, for a more updated status of the upcoming release. Thanks! - "Josimpson Ocaba" wrote: +1 on Continuum and Archiva -- Joe Ocaba - Original Message - From: "Lars Corneliussen" To: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:15:01 AM Subject: Re: [NPanday] Server Repo Problem Am 17.01.11 04:34, schrieb Adelita Padilla: Nexus/Hudson or Nexus/Teamcity As of today, we have 3 votes: * Archiva/Continuum (1 vote) * Nexus/Hudson (1 vote) * Archiva/Continumm or others (1 vote) Any thoughts or more suggestions? Thanks! - "Adelita Padilla" wrote: -- Hi All, With the upcoming release, what repository and build server are we going to use? I'll go with vmbuild/archiva and vmbuild/continuum. Thanks, -- liit - Brett Porter wrote: On 10/11/2010, at 5:00 PM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote: Hi Everyone, You may have encountered problems with accessing repo.npanday.org We currently use archiva& continuum on repo.npanday.org Should we move to vmbuild/archiva or repository.apache.org; I'm fine with either, though my obviously biased opinion is for Archiva :) It does have built in NPanday support, but we'd need to sort out synchronising it to Central. should we move to vmbuild.apache.org/continuum or hudson or buildbot? Again I'm fine with any of these. Even though I set up Continuum, it might be better to use one of the others (at least initially) since they already have Windows slaves configured. Gav is a mentor here and did a lot of buildbot work. - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ -- liit -- liit -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
Re: [NPanday] Server Repo Problem
Let me understand if I got this right... For the release we need a repo obviously - and since we are already using Archiva, it has specific NPanday support, and I'm willing to do the work - we're trying that. If we have any problems we could try the Nexus install instead. Lars, and others that preferred Nexus - are you ok with that, or do you specifically want to use Nexus on repository.apache.org for some other reason? For the CI, we should do that but it's separate from the release. We have a Windows box running Continuum now but it's better to use the Apache infrastructure. Since there are already Hudson windows slaves and a lot of people liked that option we're trying that. We'll probably need them to install the Windows SDK for testing, so someone will need to volunteer to help with that. If we get stuck we could investigate Continuum, but again we'd need to do the work to set up the agents & VMs. Is that right? Any objections? - Brett On 18/01/2011, at 2:31 PM, Adelita Padilla wrote: > > Wrapping things up, we have the ff results: > > > * Repository - ARCHIVA > > * CI - CONTINUUM/HUDSON > > > Please refer to the new thread: [NPanday] TO DO List before Release, for a > more updated status of the upcoming release. > > > Thanks! > > > - "Josimpson Ocaba" wrote: > >> +1 on Continuum and Archiva >> >> -- >> Joe Ocaba >> >> - Original Message ----- >> From: "Lars Corneliussen" >> To: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:15:01 AM >> Subject: Re: [NPanday] Server Repo Problem >> >> Am 17.01.11 04:34, schrieb Adelita Padilla: >> >> Nexus/Hudson >> or >> Nexus/Teamcity >>> >>> As of today, we have 3 votes: >>> >>> * Archiva/Continuum (1 vote) >>> * Nexus/Hudson (1 vote) >>> * Archiva/Continumm or others (1 vote) >>> >>> >>> Any thoughts or more suggestions? >>> >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> - "Adelita Padilla" wrote: >>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> With the upcoming release, what repository and build server are we >> >>>> going to use? >>>> >>>> I'll go with vmbuild/archiva and vmbuild/continuum. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -- >>>> >>>> liit >>>> - Brett Porter wrote: >>>>> On 10/11/2010, at 5:00 PM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> You may have encountered problems with accessing repo.npanday.org >> >>>>>> We currently use archiva& continuum on repo.npanday.org >>>>>> >>>>>> Should we move to vmbuild/archiva or repository.apache.org; >>>>> I'm fine with either, though my obviously biased opinion is for >>>> Archiva :) It does have built in NPanday support, but we'd need to >> >>>> sort out synchronising it to Central. >>>>>> should we move to vmbuild.apache.org/continuum or hudson or >>>> buildbot? >>>>> Again I'm fine with any of these. Even though I set up Continuum, >> it >>>> might be better to use one of the others (at least initially) since >> >>>> they already have Windows slaves configured. Gav is a mentor here >> and >>>> did a lot of buildbot work. >>>>> - Brett >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Brett Porter >>>>> br...@apache.org >>>>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> liit > > > -- > > liit -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
Re: [NPanday] Server Repo Problem
Wrapping things up, we have the ff results: * Repository - ARCHIVA * CI - CONTINUUM/HUDSON Please refer to the new thread: [NPanday] TO DO List before Release, for a more updated status of the upcoming release. Thanks! - "Josimpson Ocaba" wrote: > +1 on Continuum and Archiva > > -- > Joe Ocaba > > - Original Message - > From: "Lars Corneliussen" > To: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:15:01 AM > Subject: Re: [NPanday] Server Repo Problem > > Am 17.01.11 04:34, schrieb Adelita Padilla: > > Nexus/Hudson > or > Nexus/Teamcity > > > > As of today, we have 3 votes: > > > > * Archiva/Continuum (1 vote) > > * Nexus/Hudson (1 vote) > > * Archiva/Continumm or others (1 vote) > > > > > > Any thoughts or more suggestions? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > - "Adelita Padilla" wrote: > > > >> -- > >> > >> Hi All, > >> > >> With the upcoming release, what repository and build server are we > > >> going to use? > >> > >> I'll go with vmbuild/archiva and vmbuild/continuum. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -- > >> > >> liit > >> - Brett Porter wrote: > >>> On 10/11/2010, at 5:00 PM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Everyone, > >>>> > >>>> You may have encountered problems with accessing repo.npanday.org > > >>>> We currently use archiva& continuum on repo.npanday.org > >>>> > >>>> Should we move to vmbuild/archiva or repository.apache.org; > >>> I'm fine with either, though my obviously biased opinion is for > >> Archiva :) It does have built in NPanday support, but we'd need to > > >> sort out synchronising it to Central. > >>>> should we move to vmbuild.apache.org/continuum or hudson or > >> buildbot? > >>> Again I'm fine with any of these. Even though I set up Continuum, > it > >> might be better to use one of the others (at least initially) since > > >> they already have Windows slaves configured. Gav is a mentor here > and > >> did a lot of buildbot work. > >>> - Brett > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Brett Porter > >>> br...@apache.org > >>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > -- > > > > > > liit -- liit
Re: [NPanday] Server Repo Problem
+1 on Continuum and Archiva -- Joe Ocaba - Original Message - From: "Lars Corneliussen" To: npanday-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:15:01 AM Subject: Re: [NPanday] Server Repo Problem Am 17.01.11 04:34, schrieb Adelita Padilla: Nexus/Hudson or Nexus/Teamcity > > As of today, we have 3 votes: > > * Archiva/Continuum (1 vote) > * Nexus/Hudson (1 vote) > * Archiva/Continumm or others (1 vote) > > > Any thoughts or more suggestions? > > > Thanks! > > > - "Adelita Padilla" wrote: > >> -- >> >> Hi All, >> >> With the upcoming release, what repository and build server are we >> going to use? >> >> I'll go with vmbuild/archiva and vmbuild/continuum. >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> >> liit >> - Brett Porter wrote: >>> On 10/11/2010, at 5:00 PM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Everyone, >>>> >>>> You may have encountered problems with accessing repo.npanday.org >>>> We currently use archiva& continuum on repo.npanday.org >>>> >>>> Should we move to vmbuild/archiva or repository.apache.org; >>> I'm fine with either, though my obviously biased opinion is for >> Archiva :) It does have built in NPanday support, but we'd need to >> sort out synchronising it to Central. >>>> should we move to vmbuild.apache.org/continuum or hudson or >> buildbot? >>> Again I'm fine with any of these. Even though I set up Continuum, it >> might be better to use one of the others (at least initially) since >> they already have Windows slaves configured. Gav is a mentor here and >> did a lot of buildbot work. >>> - Brett >>> >>> -- >>> Brett Porter >>> br...@apache.org >>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>> > -- > > > liit
Re: [NPanday] Server Repo Problem
Am 17.01.11 04:34, schrieb Adelita Padilla: Nexus/Hudson or Nexus/Teamcity As of today, we have 3 votes: * Archiva/Continuum (1 vote) * Nexus/Hudson (1 vote) * Archiva/Continumm or others (1 vote) Any thoughts or more suggestions? Thanks! - "Adelita Padilla" wrote: -- Hi All, With the upcoming release, what repository and build server are we going to use? I'll go with vmbuild/archiva and vmbuild/continuum. Thanks, -- liit - Brett Porter wrote: On 10/11/2010, at 5:00 PM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote: Hi Everyone, You may have encountered problems with accessing repo.npanday.org We currently use archiva& continuum on repo.npanday.org Should we move to vmbuild/archiva or repository.apache.org; I'm fine with either, though my obviously biased opinion is for Archiva :) It does have built in NPanday support, but we'd need to sort out synchronising it to Central. should we move to vmbuild.apache.org/continuum or hudson or buildbot? Again I'm fine with any of these. Even though I set up Continuum, it might be better to use one of the others (at least initially) since they already have Windows slaves configured. Gav is a mentor here and did a lot of buildbot work. - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ -- liit
Re: [NPanday] Server Repo Problem
You people should use hudson :) Adelita Padilla schrieb: > > >As of today, we have 3 votes: > > * Archiva/Continuum (1 vote) > * Nexus/Hudson (1 vote) > * Archiva/Continumm or others (1 vote) > > >Any thoughts or more suggestions? > > >Thanks! > > >- "Adelita Padilla" wrote: > >> -- >> >> Hi All, >> >> With the upcoming release, what repository and build server are we >> going to use? >> >> I'll go with vmbuild/archiva and vmbuild/continuum. >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> >> liit >> - Brett Porter wrote: >> > >> > On 10/11/2010, at 5:00 PM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Everyone, >> > > >> > > You may have encountered problems with accessing repo.npanday.org >> >> > > >> > > We currently use archiva & continuum on repo.npanday.org >> > > >> > > Should we move to vmbuild/archiva or repository.apache.org; >> > >> > I'm fine with either, though my obviously biased opinion is for >> Archiva :) It does have built in NPanday support, but we'd need to >> sort out synchronising it to Central. >> > >> > > should we move to vmbuild.apache.org/continuum or hudson or >> buildbot? >> > >> > Again I'm fine with any of these. Even though I set up Continuum, it >> might be better to use one of the others (at least initially) since >> they already have Windows slaves configured. Gav is a mentor here and >> did a lot of buildbot work. >> > >> > - Brett >> > >> > -- >> > Brett Porter >> > br...@apache.org >> > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ >> > >> > >> > >> > > >-- > > >liit
Re: [NPanday] Server Repo Problem
As of today, we have 3 votes: * Archiva/Continuum (1 vote) * Nexus/Hudson (1 vote) * Archiva/Continumm or others (1 vote) Any thoughts or more suggestions? Thanks! - "Adelita Padilla" wrote: > -- > > Hi All, > > With the upcoming release, what repository and build server are we > going to use? > > I'll go with vmbuild/archiva and vmbuild/continuum. > > Thanks, > -- > > liit > - Brett Porter wrote: > > > > On 10/11/2010, at 5:00 PM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote: > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > You may have encountered problems with accessing repo.npanday.org > > > > > > > We currently use archiva & continuum on repo.npanday.org > > > > > > Should we move to vmbuild/archiva or repository.apache.org; > > > > I'm fine with either, though my obviously biased opinion is for > Archiva :) It does have built in NPanday support, but we'd need to > sort out synchronising it to Central. > > > > > should we move to vmbuild.apache.org/continuum or hudson or > buildbot? > > > > Again I'm fine with any of these. Even though I set up Continuum, it > might be better to use one of the others (at least initially) since > they already have Windows slaves configured. Gav is a mentor here and > did a lot of buildbot work. > > > > - Brett > > > > -- > > Brett Porter > > br...@apache.org > > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > > > -- liit
Re: [NPanday] Server Repo Problem
-- Hi All, With the upcoming release, what repository and build server are we going to use? I'll go with vmbuild/archiva and vmbuild/continuum. Thanks, -- liit - Brett Porter wrote: > > On 10/11/2010, at 5:00 PM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote: > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > You may have encountered problems with accessing repo.npanday.org > > > > We currently use archiva & continuum on repo.npanday.org > > > > Should we move to vmbuild/archiva or repository.apache.org; > > I'm fine with either, though my obviously biased opinion is for Archiva :) It > does have built in NPanday support, but we'd need to sort out synchronising > it to Central. > > > should we move to vmbuild.apache.org/continuum or hudson or buildbot? > > Again I'm fine with any of these. Even though I set up Continuum, it might be > better to use one of the others (at least initially) since they already have > Windows slaves configured. Gav is a mentor here and did a lot of buildbot > work. > > - Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > br...@apache.org > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > >
Re: [NPanday] Server Repo Problem
On 10/11/2010, at 5:00 PM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > You may have encountered problems with accessing repo.npanday.org > > We currently use archiva & continuum on repo.npanday.org > > Should we move to vmbuild/archiva or repository.apache.org; I'm fine with either, though my obviously biased opinion is for Archiva :) It does have built in NPanday support, but we'd need to sort out synchronising it to Central. > should we move to vmbuild.apache.org/continuum or hudson or buildbot? Again I'm fine with any of these. Even though I set up Continuum, it might be better to use one of the others (at least initially) since they already have Windows slaves configured. Gav is a mentor here and did a lot of buildbot work. - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
Re: [NPanday] Server Repo Problem
My preferences: Nexus and Hudson so repository.apache.org + https://hudson.apache.org/hudson Jeff On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Josimpson Ocaba wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > You may have encountered problems with accessing repo.npanday.org > > We currently use archiva & continuum on repo.npanday.org > > Should we move to vmbuild/archiva or repository.apache.org; should we move > to vmbuild.apache.org/continuum or hudson or buildbot? > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks, > > -- > Joe Ocaba > -- "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling. - Bjarne Stroustrup http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury
