ergy 0.1
> >
> > can anyone help me with this output ? and please could someone explain the
> > difference between the
> >
> > $ns_ at 60.0 "$node_(0) off"
> >
> > and
> >
> > $ns_ rtmodel-at 60.0 down $node_(0)
> >
ailable when using an energy model? and how come the
> second one has no effect on wireless nodes
>
> PS: i am using a 802.11 model
>
> any help would be greatly appreciated
>
>
>
>
>
> Message original
>
y appreciated
-------- Message original
Objet: Re: [ns] shutting down link or node with wireless topology
De: "Daniel Dekst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Jeu 28 juin 2007 3:42
À: ns-users@ISI.EDU
-
seems "$node off" works
-
抢注雅虎免费邮箱3.5G容量,20M附件!
--
>
>Message: 17
>Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:20:48 +0200 (CEST)
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [ns] shutting down link or node with wireless topology
>To: "Daniel Mahrenholz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: ns-users@ISI.EDU
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hello Daniel,
Thank you, but you didnt say why the solution of simulating a complete
node failure wouldn't work.
I understand that shutting down links is not an option since links don't
exist like i supposed but shouldn't i be able to shut down a node in
wireless like i do in wired scenarios figu
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> I am a new ns user i am trying to simulate a wireless topology using OLSR
> as a routing protocol. I need to simulate a link failure for a short
> period of time to study the reactions of OLSR to the failure
In a wireless scenario you do not have links, so you can
Hello,
I am a new ns user i am trying to simulate a wireless topology using OLSR
as a routing protocol. I need to simulate a link failure for a short
period of time to study the reactions of OLSR to the failure.
while searching through nsDOC and the user list i found that the only way
to simulat