what is meant by mac layer time stamping?
kindly reply me
thank u
On 5/27/14, Jega Kumaran wrote:
> please help me to calculate the average synchronisation error (awk) script.
>
> thank u in advance
>
>
> On 5/22/14, knudfl wrote:
>>
>>> @boufedah badissi azzouz
>>> ns2 `Trace Formats´
>>
>> N
> @boufedah badissi azzouz
> ns2 `Trace Formats´
NS-2 Trace Formats http://nsnam.isi.edu/nsnam/index.php/NS-2_Trace_Formats
→ → "New Wireless Trace Formats"
-
--
View this message in context:
http://network-simulator-ns-2.7690.n7.nabble.com/new-wireless-trace-format-tp28767p28772.html
Sen
You mean the one with energy model?
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 7:06 PM, boufedah badissi azzouz <
badiss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> hi, my friends.
> i wan't the new version of wireless trace format with explanation of the
> fields.
> and if possible how the diffrence between node number (field5) an
Message-
From: Matthias Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2007 17:25
To: David Bath
Subject: Re: [ns] new wireless trace format
If you really want to try the new trace,
forget all the testing and searching in the tcl direction -
simply comment out the setting of the newtrace
ither resetting the flag, or just not honouring it somewhere
Again, any thoughts would be very much appreciated,
Best Regards,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2007 13:27
To: David Bath
Subject: Re: [ns] new wireless trace f
re
all the newtrace action happens...
Any thoughts on whether I'm reading this right?
Best,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2007 13:27
To: David Bath
Subject: Re: [ns] new wireless trace format
OK,
the calling for this f
For info: when I run the nsclick scripts, argv[1] is always equal to
"namattach" or "target" if this helps.
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ?e Olbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2007 10:05
To: David Bath
Subject: Re: [ns] new wireless trace
bruary 2007 10:05
To: David Bath
Subject: Re: [ns] new wireless trace format
Hi!
its set here in cmu-trace.cc:
CMUTrace::command(int argc, const char*const* argv)
{
if(argc == 3) {
if(strcmp(argv[1], "node") == 0) {
node_ = (MobileN
uot; ns is used,
but neither work when a ClickNode is used.
Sorry if I misunderstood...
Best Regards,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2007 10:07
To: David Bath
Subject: Re: [ns] new wireless trace format
The newtrace variable is
tting the newtrace_ variable? Is
it possible that clicknodes are somehow mangling it?
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ?e Olbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2007 09:05
To: David Bath
Subject: RE: [ns] new wireless trace format
Hi!
I have no idea about click as such,
ocation data in old trace
format, (but works fine if I don't use ClickNodes) so I wonder if
perhaps this is a clue to where the problem is?
Thanks for continuing help.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ?e Olbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2007 08:41
To: David Bath
Subjec
ition it
seems to be ignored.
Any other thoughts would be much appreciated!
Best Regards,
Dave
From: Shaili Desai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2007 05:55
To: David Bath
Subject: Re: [ns] new wireless trace format
You need the command $ns_ use-newtrace and that wil
efully received!
Best Regards,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Bath
Sent: 25 February 2007 00:02
To: ns-users@ISI.EDU
Subject: Re: [ns] new wireless trace format
Hi list,
Try as I might, I can't get my wireless traces to sp
Hi list,
Try as I might, I can't get my wireless traces to spit out in new
format. I'm using nsclick (compiled with ns2 version 2.3) and it seems
to otherwise be performing fine.
However, when I try the well-documented:
set ns_ [new Simulator]
set tracefd [open "" w]
$ns_ use-newtrace
$ns_ tr
14 matches
Mail list logo
