4-5-1, is thta what MM is playing now!!!
so whats so absurd about that?
On 25/10/2010 1:28 PM, Steven Millward wrote:
That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever
seen proposed for Wolves.
groups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick
[sec=unclassified]
What no Milijas?
From: nswolves@google
Everyone moans about Mick playing people out of position. You have two
wingers playing as central midfielders and two strikers playing as wingers.
Plus you have no defensive midfielder to break up play or win the ball.
That's what's absurd.
On 25 October 2010 20:15, Andy swamp...@tpg.com.au
where does it say in the rule book that you have to have a defensive
midfielder?
both SEB and Fletcher can cross the ball as good as any Wolves
winger
Hunt on the weekend when he came on had no speed about him to be
thought of as a winger, (I know he's
There is no rule book but I think you need someone to win the ball if you're
having five attacking players. I don't think having the best ten outfield
players is the right approach
I watched the first half of the Chelsea game this morning and we played very
well. There was a bit of cat and
I love his interviews on sky, he makes me laughshould our manager
really be making us laugh?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog Reet
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 09:53
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject:
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
I love his interviews on sky, he makes me laughshould our manager
really be making us laugh?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog Reet
Sent: Monday, 25
What no Milijas?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick
I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from
: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
What no Milijas?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick
I like
Replace Jarvis with Milijas
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:36 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield
Reserve, didn't think he played that well on sat. seemed lost
On 25/10/2010 11:31 AM, Morris, Lee SGT wrote:
What no Milijas?
From:
nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
:
nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
What no Milijas
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
I wouldn't swap Jarvis with Milijas,
If any thing in the my formation I would proberly swap Fletcher with
Jaris. keep a straight 3 midfield, Fletcher can deliver some love
through ball and can get on the end of a pass on the edge
] On
Behalf Of Andy
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:48 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
I wouldn't swap Jarvis with Milijas,
If any thing in the my formation I would proberly
Quiet morning!
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:29 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Never seen you get fired up
2010 12:29:11
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Never seen you get fired up like this before Matty!! Are you on the
same arrangement as Paul Crowe where you see no action unless Wolves
win?
From: nswolves
It'll be december before you have any fun!!
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Mon Oct 25 12:44:45 2010
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
4 more games
That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen proposed
for Wolves.
*From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *Andy
*Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM
*To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick
formation (might be a bit harsh but so be it).
*From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *Andy
*Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:48 AM
*To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
I wouldn't swap Jarvis
4-1-5 - everyone will be doing it soon.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 1:28 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified
, 25 October 2010 12:28
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen
proposed for Wolves.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy
] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:28
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen
proposed for Wolves.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswol
@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
What no Milijas?
--
*From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry
*Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29
*To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
*Subject
Millward
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 1:37 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
It's basically back to the old two banks of five players that they used in
the late nineteenth century. It might have won us the FA Cup in 1893 but
it's hardly
...@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *Steven Millward
*Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 12:28
*To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen
proposed for Wolves.
*From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
Millward
*Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 1:37 PM
*To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
It's basically back to the old two banks of five players that they used
in the late nineteenth century. It might have won us the FA Cup in 1893 but
it's
*To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
What no Milijas?
¼hr size=2 width=100% aligî3Dcenter
*From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry
*Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:45
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
If 451 seems too defensive just think of it as 433 with Jarvis, Doyle and Hunt
:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *Steven Millward
*Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 12:45
*To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
If 451 seems too defensive just think of it as 433 with Jarvis, Doyle
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
If 451 seems too defensive just think of it as 433 with Jarvis, Doyle
and Hunt in the forward 3
Three strikers, two wingers and an attacking midfielder sounds nice but
who's going
30 matches
Mail list logo
