Just in case you haven't come across this on the BBC Sport website. If
only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers
/9121353.stm
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
Did he explain why in the first 30 seconds we gave the ball to Chelski via a
kick off back pass and a Hahnemann hoof?
Thought the bullshite artiste extraordinaire said we had to retain
possession otherwise the ball would come back with spots on.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Just letting everyone know that our match against Man Utd in the Carling
Cup is live on Fox Sports 3 3HD on Wednesday morning at 5:30am.
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email
I love his interviews on sky, he makes me laughshould our manager
really be making us laugh?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog Reet
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 09:53
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject:
He makes us cry with his tactics so making us laugh with his interviews
is obviously the yang to go with his ying tactics.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:01 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better
team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM
said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of
goal.
I think regardlees of postion,
Sylvan Ebanks-Blake
I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward,
Edwards, Craddock).
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Andy
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick
after watching the
What no Milijas?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick
I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from
2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan
tactics that.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Replace Jarvis with Milijas
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:36 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man
Reserve, didn't think he played that well on sat. seemed lost
On 25/10/2010 11:31 AM, Morris, Lee SGT wrote:
What no Milijas?
From:
nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
to me hunt didnt play like winger on sat
On 25/10/2010 11:35 AM, LEESE Matthew wrote:
2 wingers (Hunt and
Jarvis)in a 3 man midfield?That's proper Kevin Keegan
tactics that.
From:
Since Keogh has left, Jarvis has adopted the tag of my least liked
player so I can't fit him into any formation (might be a bit harsh but
so be it).
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Andy
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:48 AM
To:
Hi Leese, just my thoughts, how to get a good balance from the squad
Wolves have, Flether would be very good as a Attacking midfield
player and Jarvis plays more of a attacking winger/forward than a
midfield winger
On 25/10/2010 11:59 AM, LEESE Matthew wrote:
Quiet morning!
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:29 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Never seen you get fired up
4 more games witout a win and I may consider the Priestood!
Pity the wife when we do win!
2 - 1 win to the Wolves against Man City.
Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Date: Mon, 25 Oct
It'll be december before you have any fun!!
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Mon Oct 25 12:44:45 2010
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
4 more games
That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen proposed
for Wolves.
*From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *Andy
*Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM
*To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick
Jarvis is widely thought to be one of the best players in our squad.
Is it just that you don't fancy him?
On 25 October 2010 11:51, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.comwrote:
Since Keogh has left, Jarvis has adopted the tag of my least liked player
so I can’t fit him into any
4-1-5 - everyone will be doing it soon.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 1:28 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
That
I think it just needs one chaneg to make it not so absurd. Either
Fletcher or Ebanks Blake for a defensive central midfielder would do it
for me team wise
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent:
If we get a result while Henry is out, I'll start the campaign to keep
him out myself.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:31
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE:
It's basically back to the old two banks of five players that they used in
the late nineteenth century. It might have won us the FA Cup in 1893 but
it's hardly appropriate now.
Swampy, are you Old News Wolf in disguise?
On 25 October 2010 11:35, LEESE Matthew matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.auwrote:
I like the personnel that Andy has put up - not sure I'd line them up the
same way.
Although it really is a 4-3-3 and I could live with that (as long as the 3
the 3 run their bollocks off).
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven
Having seen our performances this season in 442 I don't think we'll be going
anywhere but down with that. I've taped the game but from what I've read we
were much better with three CMs.
Fletcher now looks like an odd signing. Mick would have been crucified if
Doyle had got injured and we only
If 451 seems too defensive just think of it as 433 with Jarvis, Doyle and
Hunt in the forward 3
Three strikers, two wingers and an attacking midfielder sounds nice but
who's going to give them the ball?
On 25 October 2010 13:42, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote:
I like the personnel
Has anyone checked the toilets in the Aurora? Presumably 2-0 doesn't
warrant a full trashing?
On 25 October 2010 13:44, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote:
If 451 seems too defensive just think of it as 433 with Jarvis, Doyle and
Hunt in the forward 3
Three strikers, two wingers
Chuck Mancienne in for Fletcher, he's defensive and attacking...lol
So I'd go
Marcus Hahnemann
Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme
Stephen Hunt - Mancienne - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis
Sylvan Ebanks-Blake - Kevin Doyle
So we're only disagreeing over SEB for Milijas. I wish JVD could play in
that position but he's obviously not right.
I would like that formation if we had Ince and Rae in for Mancienne and
David Jones.
On 25 October 2010 13:48, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:
Chuck Mancienne
U need to have a word with Mick, it aint half obvious.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:52
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick
I think we need to see how Jarvis and Hunt go, I'm expecting the likes
of Jones and obvioulsy Doyle to get a lot more chances with those two
playing. So on that basis I'd put Milijas in for Ebanks Blake.
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
It's a deal. The two factions are united.
We only have to get Marcus on board now but he picks players on the basis of
liking them, not their footballing ability.
On 25 October 2010 14:11, Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au wrote:
I think we need to see how Jarvis and Hunt go, I'm
32 matches
Mail list logo
