What's annoying is the commentators not acknowledging that it's Wolves'
second XI. They keep talking about how Wolves will get back into the game
whereas we've clearly not gone there to get anything. Don't they know it's
a dead rubber?
2009/12/16 Steven Millward millward@gmail.com
Is it
Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an
under strength team ;)
--
Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
Big call by MM, hope it doesn't back fire on him come Sunday!
Nice to see the boot on the other foot in regard to smaller teams playing a
second string team against a big team. However, what are the Premier League
rules in this regard, anybody know? Chelsea have already started making
It is a scandal, and we are sponsored by sportingbet...hehehehe
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of pcr...@contechengineering.com
Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 08:14
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE:
How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it,
all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can
be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as
Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a
They can't...I was half joking but reading the reports it looks like MM
copped some stick off our fans due to team selection.
I kind of agree with what Macarthy has done here but it does leave you
think that maybe with our full team we could of pulled off a surprise.
I guess by replacing all
I guess we'll know on Sunday - tactical genius or Thick Mick.
Where's your money going Rog?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:30 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
the Premier League have confirmed that there has been no wrong-doing and
that Wolves are entitled to pick any 11 from their registered player
list.
I feel sorry for the strongest 11 who have been denied the opportunity
to play at Old Trafford and test themselves against the current
champions in
True, true. Not the best move, but as Matt said we'll find out on the weekend.
Got a note from Tom this morning (remember him??). He was glad he didn't spend
the 43 quid to travel to Old Trafford to watch the reserves.
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
Date: Wed, 16 Dec
Dad, what was it like to get relegated from the Premiership after only one
season?
Terrible son, but at least I got to play at Old Trafford.
2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
the Premier League have confirmed that there has been no wrong-doing and
that Wolves are
Face it, if he'd played the first XI and lost, you'd have been whining: Why
did he play our best players when we've got a massive game against Burnley
on Satuday?
2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
the Premier League have confirmed that there has been no wrong-doing and
considering Man Utd certainly weren't anywhere near full strength, and
the fact that our first XI were on a high after beating Spurs, I would
have thought it's as good a time as any to try our luck against Utd. If
they couldn't lift for that type of opportunity then I don't know what
will get
I see the Burnley game is on Sunday lunchtime. So live coverage again;
Look at this little lot, looks like its been scripted for Wolves and
Burnley;
Arsenal v Hull (Arsenal win)
Blackburn v Spurs (Spurs win)
Fulham v Man U (Man U win)
Pompey v Liverpool (Liverpool win)
Everton v Brum (Brum
You're always well @#...@#ed off with Wolves/Mick anyway, so how would we
notice the difference?
2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
considering Man Utd certainly weren't anywhere near full strength, and
the fact that our first XI were on a high after beating Spurs, I would
LEE IN MICK DONE GOOD SHOCKER
2009/12/16 Morris, Lee SGT lee.mor...@defence.gov.au
I see the Burnley game is on Sunday lunchtime. So live coverage again;
Look at this little lot, looks like its been scripted for Wolves and
Burnley;
Arsenal v Hull (Arsenal win)
Blackburn v Spurs (Spurs
I'm the eternal optimist...I should know fu-ckin better BUT I would be
very very very pissed off if I was on holiday in England and had payed
good money to watch that team...So I do so both sides of the argument.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
not true... I was very happy after the last two results even if the
performances themselves weren't particularly confidence inspiring.
I agree that I'm perhaps slightly more pessimistic than some but that's
simply because I want to see an continual improvement in results and to
get continual
*Baaa-haaa-hahahahaha*
2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
not true... I was very happy after the last two results even if the
performances themselves weren't particularly confidence inspiring.
I agree that I'm perhaps *slightly more pessimistic than some* but
How much did you wager Rog? At what odds?
2009/12/16 Rog Rita rognr...@exemail.com.au
EXTREMELY THICK AND FCUKING GUTLESS.
--
*From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *LEESE Matthew
*Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December
So the experts thought we only had a 95% chance of losing and we lost.
No surprise then.
2009/12/16 Rog Rita rognr...@exemail.com.au
$5 @ $19.
Would have needed 6 noughts behind the 9 to have made it a value bet.
Get the FA match fixing squad looking into this game.
*From:*
Foinavon?
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 5:04 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
So the experts thought we only had a 95% chance of
21 matches
Mail list logo
