Idiots. Looks like they'll be showing Villa v Liverpool and Bolton v Man
City from the voting. 2 matches that dont mean anything to relegation, just
because of the volume of fans. They could easily just show the relegation
matches + ManUtd (anyway).
btw, If they are recording IPs, just try voting
I just did the same to most of my address book. We've got a lot of
ground to make up to make it the main game but we're giving it a late
go!! Voting closes tomorrow at lunchtime.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA
Sent: T
Have sent it out to around 30 clients and asked that they pass it on.
Jim
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 4:01 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] TV M
Yes I've been voting non-stop for the past 10 minutes but the numbers
haven't changed so they must have something setup to prevent multiple
votes.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 3:54 PM
To: nswolves@goog
I just got 3 of my lot to vote 3 times each. They usually set those things
to record IP addresses to prevent duplicate voting.
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Paul Crowe
wrote:
> Just voted 3 x times and we have stayed at 11.4%.
>
>
>
> Paul Crowe
>
> Sales Manager - Asia Pacific
>
>
>
> ConTech
Just voted 3 x times and we have stayed at 11.4%.
Paul Crowe
Sales Manager - Asia Pacific
ConTech (Sydney Office)
PO Box 3517
Rhodes Waterside
Rhodes NSW 2138
Tel: 02 97396636 Fax: 02 97396542
Mob: 0406009562
Email: pcr...@contechengineering.com
Website: www.contechengineering.
If any of you are still on the worldwide Wolves list or MolMix can you
please post this link and get everyone to vote for our match:
http://www.foxsports.com.au/football/premier-league/foxsportscomau-gives
-users-the-chance-to-vote-on-which-barclays-premier-league-matches-to-br
oadcast/story-e6
Guys,
Everyone needs to go to foxsports.com.au and vote for our match to be
shown on Sunday. As there are too many matches for multi-view, they are
taking votes for the matches to be shown so get everybody that you know
to go online and vote for our match PLEASE!!!
Cheers,
Marcus
The info
I'm definitely not providing the same services as your wife if we do happen to
win!!!
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Paul Crowe
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 3:33 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] League Position
>Fr
>From a recent article in the Daily telegraph “Wolves’ most recent accounts
revealed a £9 million profit on £61 million turnover, including £39 million
from broadcast revenue, a reminder of the vital importance of staying up”.
Therefore, besides TV income our remaining turnover is $22 million.
The same West Ham who have been paying ridiculous wages to people like Robbie
Keane and Wayne Bridge during the second half of the season in a failed attempt
to ensure their survival, who have the football writer's player of the year
(Scott Parker) turning out for them as well as England interna
I only named 5 because Matt said he was struggling to think of 5.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 2:37 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] League Position
But you think we sho
But you think we should be at the bottom of that quadrant as you can only
name five teams that have a poorer squad than us.
On 19 May 2011 14:31, Marcus Chantry wrote:
> Position wise about right (11th to 15th constitutes 3rdquadrant/quartile),
> but not above some of the teams that I thought
Position wise about right (11th to 15th constitutes 3rd
quadrant/quartile), but not above some of the teams that I thought we
would be above.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 2:27 PM
To: nswolves@googl
So if we win on Saturday and finish 15th you would then agree that Wolves
have finished exactly where you expected them to finish in the league table?
On 19 May 2011 14:15, Marcus Chantry wrote:
> My personal opinion is that we currently have a better squad than, and
> therefore should be ahea
With property development you generally borrow money and as long as the
yield on the development is greater than the cost of capital then you make
money.
It's a pretty simple calculation to do in fact.
- It's said to cost 16m for the first stage.
- It adds 2,500 seats.
- 30 quid a seat i
My personal opinion is that we currently have a better squad than, and
therefore should be ahead of, the following teams:
* West Ham
* Wigan
* Blackpool
* Newcastle
* West Brom
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Marcus
You say that 'With the squad we have we should be in the Premier League 3rd
quadrant'. I'm curious to know who you think should be in the 4th quadrant on
account of having weaker squads than us? I'm struggling to think of 5.
Matt
Before printing, please consider the environment.
IMPO
It's not a case of leaving seats empty for safety if you can walk up to
a turnstile every home game and buy a ticket. I have friends there that
are doing exactly that most home games.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Thursday,
You also have to allow seats left empty for safety/segregation.
Marcus - I'd like to who are the teams who should be in the 4th quadrant on
account of having weaker squads than us?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
S
Blackpool has been at 98% capacity this season in a ground of 16,000.
Very few clubs fill more than 98% of the ground. It's hard to do. There
comes a point when you are full and expand. That point is less than 100%.
We have been at 96% capacity and it's time to expand.
On 19 May 2011 12:36, Mo
I'm sure Morgan has not bothered looking at forecasts of attendances or
anything like that. You're probably the first person to work out that it's
a huge mistake
On 19 May 2011 12:48, Marcus Chantry wrote:
> I would probably update the menu and the quality of the food to ensure
> that it was b
OK. And what's the cost in terms of players to move up a few places in your
view?
And then what's the ROI?
On 19 May 2011 12:51, Marcus Chantry wrote:
> Here is the prize money split for last season. So places make a fairly
> big difference for two-bob clubs like ours (£800,000 per place):
>
Here is the prize money split for last season. So places make a fairly big
difference for two-bob clubs like ours (£800,000 per place):
Chelsea - £16,000,000 (WINNERS)
Manchester United - £15,200,000
Arsenal - £14,400,000
Totenham Hotspur - £13,600,000
Manchester City - £12,800,000
Aston
The ground is defiantely not full every week...far from it.
I also though the prize money increases significantly eg - I read that
Stoke throwing in the towel this week could cost them a fair
bit..although I ahven't checked up on that.
With the squad we have...we are about where we should be...
Capacity is 29,195
Baggies game had 28,510
So it was at 98% capacity.
You reckon that the absences were because no one else wanted to go or
because a few STH and people that cought a ticket couldn't make it.
We are consistenly over 95% capacity.
If you had a restaurant with 100 tables, 50 of whi
Who are the teams who should be in the 4th quadrant on account of having weaker
squads than us?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 12:31 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subje
Strange statement Steve.
Fact is that for almost every home game this season you have been able to walk
up on the day and get a ticket, including the crunch match against the Baggies
2 weeks ago. That surely is a reflection of the fact that people aren't
enjoying watching Wolves play under
Players are generally depreciating assets. They are usually worth less once
they've been used than they are when you buy them. That means an operating
club loses cash through depreciation. I've said before that I think Morgan
has wanted to stop players depreciating by buying them young so they a
How can a more successful team generate more cash? The ground is full every
week and most people buy shirts. The prize money and TV increase is
relatively small for finishing a few places higher.
Where do you think we should be in the table Lee, with the squad we have?
On 19 May 2011 11:09, Mor
Just looked at the new Home shirt for next season. Must say I think
it's ok and better than this years effort.
http://www.wolves.co.uk/page/News/0,,10307~2362661,00.html
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose o
I always thought a successful team, even relatively, is what brings in
the cash. Wolves fans are amongst the most fickle in the land and the
loss of revenue through relegation this year would be enormousNotice
I said "would" I think we will stay up by the skin of out teeth and the
slowly slowly
The new stadium is actually an opportunity to generate more money, not only
through increased capacity/ticket sales but through the 'non football'
facilities that will be included and allowing an income stream from the stadium
that is not so limited to match days. I'm aware there's already facil
I've got nothing against the short slow steps, as long as progress is
being made. Morgan is obviously no mug, and I do understand Matty's
reasoning behind teh timing of the stadium redevelopment. Did we really
need it though? Morgan obvioulsy know best but why wouldn't he wait
until our safety is g
Agree.
I don't understand where everyone gets these lofty expectations from. We
spent 30 years in the wilderness where the goal each and every crushing
season was simply to get back to the Premier League. Now we are there, some
people seem to think we should be pushing for Europe.
Marcus, you s
I'd say the small step approach seems a sensible and proven one - look at teams
like Stoke and Sunderland and compare their recent history with that of clubs
who have over committed financially such as Portsmouth, Hull and Leeds. Unless
you've got a Man City type owner where you're not bound by
I've changed the title because it would have been too long with my extra
bit added.
Anyway, Morgan seems to be working on the small step theory, which
totally baffles me because he's just about to spend a fortune on a
stadium which will be half full if the small step we made this year
isn't enoug
Maybe thats based on Morgan only planning on putting in small amounts of
money each year, and measuring MM on what he achieved with it ?
He wont get a big name manager in as they will expect lots of money to
spend, which he obviously doesnt want to pay.
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Marcus Cha
What worries me is that Morgan has stated that Mick has made progress
every year since he took over but when you look at how he's measured
that it is the context of very small fractions or single points, so
based on that run rate Morgan will be 100 years old before he sees us
getting anywhere near
Good to see we're both on the ball Mark. I just posted a link to the
same story on ESPN.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of mark worrall
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 8:55 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Wolves owner Steve Morgan
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story/_/id/921039/mick-mccarthy-won't-
lose-job-if-wolves-are-relegated?cc=3436
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email
in any way and should de
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/13440664.stm
--
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.
Have you done this yet Rog?
The problem is that we could lose by four goals and two of the other teams
draw or win and we still go down. So there are lots and lots more than six
combinations and that ruins the odds.
I was just about to place my bets when I noticed.
On 18 May 2011 10:12, Rog & R
43 matches
Mail list logo
