RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
Saving the first team to play at home against Burnley, bleedin Burnley? Gutless in the extreme. Burnley had a woeful away record then, still have now. They'd amassed a massive 1 point away from home before they visited us. Agree totally that we shouldn't be the only ones to be picked out and slapped over the wrist with a sparrow's feather for throwing games. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 28 April 2010 8:30 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Good http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/86 48361.stm on ya Jez Glad we're standing up for ourselves rather than giving into the Premier league crap. They are in a really tricky position now. Just out of hypothetical interest, would those who disagreed with the team selection for Manure still rather we had gone for it and risked being knackered for Burnely. Those three points against Burnley came in very handy. Marcus, I note in your email a couple down you equated us getting a result at Burnley with Mick being a tactical genius. It's another admission from you that he is a tactical genius isn't it? On 16 December 2009 10:44, Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com wrote: not true... I was very happy after the last two results even if the performances themselves weren't particularly confidence inspiring. I agree that I'm perhaps slightly more pessimistic than some but that's simply because I want to see an continual improvement in results and to get continual improvements you need to try and compete. But this morning, the manager decided that it wasn't in our interests to compete and I find that deeply flawed that professional sportsmen are being paid to go out and gift a result to an opposing team. _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 11:37 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] You're always well @#...@#ed off with Wolves/Mick anyway, so how would we notice the difference? 2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com considering Man Utd certainly weren't anywhere near full strength, and the fact that our first XI were on a high after beating Spurs, I would have thought it's as good a time as any to try our luck against Utd. If they couldn't lift for that type of opportunity then I don't know what will get their competitive juices flowing. If we beat Burnley then Mick will take the plaudits for a stroke of tactical genius and all will be forgotten, but given our record in must win games (i.e. Birmingham, Portsmouth), I certainly won't be putting any money on us getting the result. I'm just a bit annoyed that we conceded before we even stepped on the pitch. We could have forfeited the game and we would have recorded exactly the same result; a 3 - 0 against and then the entire squad would have been fresh for Sunday. I want to see my team compete against the best so then at least we would have had a chance at another Kenny Miller moment, but instead Mick decides it's a battle not worth fighting and takes the gamble that we will beat Burnley on Sunday. I hope we do otherwise I'm going to be well @#...@#ed off. _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 11:18 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Face it, if he'd played the first XI and lost, you'd have been whining: Why did he play our best players when we've got a massive game against Burnley on Satuday? 2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com the Premier League have confirmed that there has been no wrong-doing and that Wolves are entitled to pick any 11 from their registered player list. I feel sorry for the strongest 11 who have been denied the opportunity to play at Old Trafford and test themselves against the current champions in front of 76,000 people. Surely as a professional these are the types of matches that you can look back on and say that you completed with the best in the game. I can just picture the stories to the kids: Dad, what was it like to play against Man Utd at Old Trafford?, Craddock says I didn't get to play that one son as I was saving myself to play Burnley the following weekend. Mick has made us a laughing stock. _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Taylor Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:24 AM To: Wolves Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as Chelsea's or Man
RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a point due to fresh legs? Subject: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:04:10 +1000 From: lee.mor...@defence.gov.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an under strength team ;) -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid _ Use Messenger in your Hotmail inbox Find out how http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/823454/web-im-for-hotmail-is-here -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
They can't...I was half joking but reading the reports it looks like MM copped some stick off our fans due to team selection. I kind of agree with what Macarthy has done here but it does leave you think that maybe with our full team we could of pulled off a surprise. I guess by replacing all ten outfield players, IF those players all return on Saturday they will be fresh and still have the confidence of two wins behind them. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Taylor Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 09:24 To: Wolves Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a point due to fresh legs? Subject: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:04:10 +1000 From: lee.mor...@defence.gov.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an under strength team ;) -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid Find out how Use Messenger in your Hotmail inbox http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/823454/web-im-for-hot mail-is-here -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
I guess we'll know on Sunday - tactical genius or Thick Mick. Where's your money going Rog? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:30 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] They can't...I was half joking but reading the reports it looks like MM copped some stick off our fans due to team selection. I kind of agree with what Macarthy has done here but it does leave you think that maybe with our full team we could of pulled off a surprise. I guess by replacing all ten outfield players, IF those players all return on Saturday they will be fresh and still have the confidence of two wins behind them. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Taylor Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 09:24 To: Wolves Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a point due to fresh legs? Subject: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:04:10 +1000 From: lee.mor...@defence.gov.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an under strength team ;) -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid Find out how Use Messenger in your Hotmail inboxhttp://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/823454/web-im-for-hotmail-is-here -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
the Premier League have confirmed that there has been no wrong-doing and that Wolves are entitled to pick any 11 from their registered player list. I feel sorry for the strongest 11 who have been denied the opportunity to play at Old Trafford and test themselves against the current champions in front of 76,000 people. Surely as a professional these are the types of matches that you can look back on and say that you completed with the best in the game. I can just picture the stories to the kids: Dad, what was it like to play against Man Utd at Old Trafford?, Craddock says I didn't get to play that one son as I was saving myself to play Burnley the following weekend. Mick has made us a laughing stock. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Taylor Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:24 AM To: Wolves Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a point due to fresh legs? Subject: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:04:10 +1000 From: lee.mor...@defence.gov.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an under strength team ;) -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid Find out how Use Messenger in your Hotmail inbox http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/823454/web-im-for-hot mail-is-here -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
True, true. Not the best move, but as Matt said we'll find out on the weekend. Got a note from Tom this morning (remember him??). He was glad he didn't spend the 43 quid to travel to Old Trafford to watch the reserves. Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:36:02 +1100 From: marcus.chan...@macquarie.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com the Premier League have confirmed that there has been no wrong-doing and that Wolves are entitled to pick any 11 from their registered player list. I feel sorry for the strongest 11 who have been denied the opportunity to play at Old Trafford and test themselves against the current champions in front of 76,000 people. Surely as a professional these are the types of matches that you can look back on and say that you completed with the best in the game. I can just picture the stories to the kids: Dad, what was it like to play against Man Utd at Old Trafford?, Craddock says I didn't get to play that one son as I was saving myself to play Burnley the following weekend. Mick has made us a laughing stock. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Taylor Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:24 AM To: Wolves Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a point due to fresh legs? Subject: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:04:10 +1000 From: lee.mor...@defence.gov.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an under strength team ;) -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid Find out how Use Messenger in your Hotmail inbox -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid _ Get more out of Hotmail Check out the latest features today http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/878466/your-hotmail-is-about-to-get-even-better -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
Dad, what was it like to get relegated from the Premiership after only one season? Terrible son, but at least I got to play at Old Trafford. 2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com the Premier League have confirmed that there has been no wrong-doing and that Wolves are entitled to pick any 11 from their registered player list. I feel sorry for the strongest 11 who have been denied the opportunity to play at Old Trafford and test themselves against the current champions in front of 76,000 people. Surely as a professional these are the types of matches that you can look back on and say that you completed with the best in the game. I can just picture the stories to the kids: Dad, what was it like to play against Man Utd at Old Trafford?, Craddock says I didn't get to play that one son as I was saving myself to play Burnley the following weekend. Mick has made us a laughing stock. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul Taylor *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:24 AM *To:* Wolves *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a point due to fresh legs? -- Subject: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:04:10 +1000 From: lee.mor...@defence.gov.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an under strength team ;) -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Find out how Use Messenger in your Hotmail inboxhttp://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/823454/web-im-for-hotmail-is-here -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
Face it, if he'd played the first XI and lost, you'd have been whining: Why did he play our best players when we've got a massive game against Burnley on Satuday? 2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com the Premier League have confirmed that there has been no wrong-doing and that Wolves are entitled to pick any 11 from their registered player list. I feel sorry for the strongest 11 who have been denied the opportunity to play at Old Trafford and test themselves against the current champions in front of 76,000 people. Surely as a professional these are the types of matches that you can look back on and say that you completed with the best in the game. I can just picture the stories to the kids: Dad, what was it like to play against Man Utd at Old Trafford?, Craddock says I didn't get to play that one son as I was saving myself to play Burnley the following weekend. Mick has made us a laughing stock. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul Taylor *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:24 AM *To:* Wolves *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a point due to fresh legs? -- Subject: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:04:10 +1000 From: lee.mor...@defence.gov.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an under strength team ;) -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Find out how Use Messenger in your Hotmail inboxhttp://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/823454/web-im-for-hotmail-is-here -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
considering Man Utd certainly weren't anywhere near full strength, and the fact that our first XI were on a high after beating Spurs, I would have thought it's as good a time as any to try our luck against Utd. If they couldn't lift for that type of opportunity then I don't know what will get their competitive juices flowing. If we beat Burnley then Mick will take the plaudits for a stroke of tactical genius and all will be forgotten, but given our record in must win games (i.e. Birmingham, Portsmouth), I certainly won't be putting any money on us getting the result. I'm just a bit annoyed that we conceded before we even stepped on the pitch. We could have forfeited the game and we would have recorded exactly the same result; a 3 - 0 against and then the entire squad would have been fresh for Sunday. I want to see my team compete against the best so then at least we would have had a chance at another Kenny Miller moment, but instead Mick decides it's a battle not worth fighting and takes the gamble that we will beat Burnley on Sunday. I hope we do otherwise I'm going to be well @#...@#ed off. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 11:18 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Face it, if he'd played the first XI and lost, you'd have been whining: Why did he play our best players when we've got a massive game against Burnley on Satuday? 2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com the Premier League have confirmed that there has been no wrong-doing and that Wolves are entitled to pick any 11 from their registered player list. I feel sorry for the strongest 11 who have been denied the opportunity to play at Old Trafford and test themselves against the current champions in front of 76,000 people. Surely as a professional these are the types of matches that you can look back on and say that you completed with the best in the game. I can just picture the stories to the kids: Dad, what was it like to play against Man Utd at Old Trafford?, Craddock says I didn't get to play that one son as I was saving myself to play Burnley the following weekend. Mick has made us a laughing stock. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Taylor Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:24 AM To: Wolves Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a point due to fresh legs? Subject: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:04:10 +1000 From: lee.mor...@defence.gov.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an under strength team ;) -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid Find out how Use Messenger in your Hotmail inbox http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/823454/web-im-for-hot mail-is-here -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
You're always well @#...@#ed off with Wolves/Mick anyway, so how would we notice the difference? 2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com considering Man Utd certainly weren't anywhere near full strength, and the fact that our first XI were on a high after beating Spurs, I would have thought it's as good a time as any to try our luck against Utd. If they couldn't lift for that type of opportunity then I don't know what will get their competitive juices flowing. If we beat Burnley then Mick will take the plaudits for a stroke of tactical genius and all will be forgotten, but given our record in must win games (i.e. Birmingham, Portsmouth), I certainly won't be putting any money on us getting the result. I'm just a bit annoyed that we conceded before we even stepped on the pitch. We could have forfeited the game and we would have recorded exactly the same result; a 3 - 0 against and then the entire squad would have been fresh for Sunday. I want to see my team compete against the best so then at least we would have had a chance at another Kenny Miller moment, but instead Mick decides it's a battle not worth fighting and takes the gamble that we will beat Burnley on Sunday. I hope we do otherwise I'm going to be well @#...@#ed off. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 11:18 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Face it, if he'd played the first XI and lost, you'd have been whining: Why did he play our best players when we've got a massive game against Burnley on Satuday? 2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com the Premier League have confirmed that there has been no wrong-doing and that Wolves are entitled to pick any 11 from their registered player list. I feel sorry for the strongest 11 who have been denied the opportunity to play at Old Trafford and test themselves against the current champions in front of 76,000 people. Surely as a professional these are the types of matches that you can look back on and say that you completed with the best in the game. I can just picture the stories to the kids: Dad, what was it like to play against Man Utd at Old Trafford?, Craddock says I didn't get to play that one son as I was saving myself to play Burnley the following weekend. Mick has made us a laughing stock. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul Taylor *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:24 AM *To:* Wolves *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a point due to fresh legs? -- Subject: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:04:10 +1000 From: lee.mor...@defence.gov.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an under strength team ;) -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Find out how Use Messenger in your Hotmail inboxhttp://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/823454/web-im-for-hotmail-is-here -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
not true... I was very happy after the last two results even if the performances themselves weren't particularly confidence inspiring. I agree that I'm perhaps slightly more pessimistic than some but that's simply because I want to see an continual improvement in results and to get continual improvements you need to try and compete. But this morning, the manager decided that it wasn't in our interests to compete and I find that deeply flawed that professional sportsmen are being paid to go out and gift a result to an opposing team. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 11:37 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] You're always well @#...@#ed off with Wolves/Mick anyway, so how would we notice the difference? 2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com considering Man Utd certainly weren't anywhere near full strength, and the fact that our first XI were on a high after beating Spurs, I would have thought it's as good a time as any to try our luck against Utd. If they couldn't lift for that type of opportunity then I don't know what will get their competitive juices flowing. If we beat Burnley then Mick will take the plaudits for a stroke of tactical genius and all will be forgotten, but given our record in must win games (i.e. Birmingham, Portsmouth), I certainly won't be putting any money on us getting the result. I'm just a bit annoyed that we conceded before we even stepped on the pitch. We could have forfeited the game and we would have recorded exactly the same result; a 3 - 0 against and then the entire squad would have been fresh for Sunday. I want to see my team compete against the best so then at least we would have had a chance at another Kenny Miller moment, but instead Mick decides it's a battle not worth fighting and takes the gamble that we will beat Burnley on Sunday. I hope we do otherwise I'm going to be well @#...@#ed off. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 11:18 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Face it, if he'd played the first XI and lost, you'd have been whining: Why did he play our best players when we've got a massive game against Burnley on Satuday? 2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com the Premier League have confirmed that there has been no wrong-doing and that Wolves are entitled to pick any 11 from their registered player list. I feel sorry for the strongest 11 who have been denied the opportunity to play at Old Trafford and test themselves against the current champions in front of 76,000 people. Surely as a professional these are the types of matches that you can look back on and say that you completed with the best in the game. I can just picture the stories to the kids: Dad, what was it like to play against Man Utd at Old Trafford?, Craddock says I didn't get to play that one son as I was saving myself to play Burnley the following weekend. Mick has made us a laughing stock. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Taylor Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:24 AM To: Wolves Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a point due to fresh legs? Subject: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:04:10 +1000 From: lee.mor...@defence.gov.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an under strength team ;) -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid Find out how Use Messenger in your Hotmail inbox http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/823454/web-im-for-hot mail-is-here
Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
*Baaa-haaa-hahahahaha* 2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com not true... I was very happy after the last two results even if the performances themselves weren't particularly confidence inspiring. I agree that I'm perhaps *slightly more pessimistic than some* but that's simply because I want to see an continual improvement in results and to get continual improvements you need to try and compete. But this morning, the manager decided that it wasn't in our interests to compete and I find that deeply flawed that professional sportsmen are being paid to go out and gift a result to an opposing team. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 11:37 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] You're always well @#...@#ed off with Wolves/Mick anyway, so how would we notice the difference? 2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com considering Man Utd certainly weren't anywhere near full strength, and the fact that our first XI were on a high after beating Spurs, I would have thought it's as good a time as any to try our luck against Utd. If they couldn't lift for that type of opportunity then I don't know what will get their competitive juices flowing. If we beat Burnley then Mick will take the plaudits for a stroke of tactical genius and all will be forgotten, but given our record in must win games (i.e. Birmingham, Portsmouth), I certainly won't be putting any money on us getting the result. I'm just a bit annoyed that we conceded before we even stepped on the pitch. We could have forfeited the game and we would have recorded exactly the same result; a 3 - 0 against and then the entire squad would have been fresh for Sunday. I want to see my team compete against the best so then at least we would have had a chance at another Kenny Miller moment, but instead Mick decides it's a battle not worth fighting and takes the gamble that we will beat Burnley on Sunday. I hope we do otherwise I'm going to be well @#...@#ed off. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 11:18 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Face it, if he'd played the first XI and lost, you'd have been whining: Why did he play our best players when we've got a massive game against Burnley on Satuday? 2009/12/16 Marcus Chantry marcus.chan...@macquarie.com the Premier League have confirmed that there has been no wrong-doing and that Wolves are entitled to pick any 11 from their registered player list. I feel sorry for the strongest 11 who have been denied the opportunity to play at Old Trafford and test themselves against the current champions in front of 76,000 people. Surely as a professional these are the types of matches that you can look back on and say that you completed with the best in the game. I can just picture the stories to the kids: Dad, what was it like to play against Man Utd at Old Trafford?, Craddock says I didn't get to play that one son as I was saving myself to play Burnley the following weekend. Mick has made us a laughing stock. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul Taylor *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:24 AM *To:* Wolves *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a point due to fresh legs? -- Subject: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:04:10 +1000 From: lee.mor...@defence.gov.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an under strength team ;) -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Find out how Use Messenger in your Hotmail inboxhttp://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/823454/web-im-for-hotmail-is-here -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
How much did you wager Rog? At what odds? 2009/12/16 Rog Rita rognr...@exemail.com.au EXTREMELY THICK AND FCUKING GUTLESS. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *LEESE Matthew *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:33 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] I guess we'll know on Sunday - tactical genius or Thick Mick. Where's your money going Rog? -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:30 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] They can't...I was half joking but reading the reports it looks like MM copped some stick off our fans due to team selection. I kind of agree with what Macarthy has done here but it does leave you think that maybe with our full team we could of pulled off a surprise. I guess by replacing all ten outfield players, IF those players all return on Saturday they will be fresh and still have the confidence of two wins behind them. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul Taylor *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 09:24 *To:* Wolves *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a point due to fresh legs? -- Subject: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:04:10 +1000 From: lee.mor...@defence.gov.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an under strength team ;) -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Find out how Use Messenger in your Hotmail inboxhttp://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/823454/web-im-for-hotmail-is-here -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. __ NOD32 2175 (20070409) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
So the experts thought we only had a 95% chance of losing and we lost. No surprise then. 2009/12/16 Rog Rita rognr...@exemail.com.au $5 @ $19. Would have needed 6 noughts behind the 9 to have made it a value bet. Get the FA match fixing squad looking into this game. *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Steven Millward *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 1:50 PM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How much did you wager Rog? At what odds? 2009/12/16 Rog Rita rognr...@exemail.com.au EXTREMELY THICK AND FCUKING GUTLESS. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *LEESE Matthew *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:33 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] I guess we'll know on Sunday - tactical genius or Thick Mick. Where's your money going Rog? -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:30 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] They can't...I was half joking but reading the reports it looks like MM copped some stick off our fans due to team selection. I kind of agree with what Macarthy has done here but it does leave you think that maybe with our full team we could of pulled off a surprise. I guess by replacing all ten outfield players, IF those players all return on Saturday they will be fresh and still have the confidence of two wins behind them. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul Taylor *Sent:* Wednesday, 16 December 2009 09:24 *To:* Wolves *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a point due to fresh legs? -- Subject: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:04:10 +1000 From: lee.mor...@defence.gov.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an under strength team ;) -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Find out how Use Messenger in your Hotmail inboxhttp://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/823454/web-im-for-hotmail-is-here -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. __ NOD32 2175 (20070409) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified]
Foinavon? _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 5:04 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] So the experts thought we only had a 95% chance of losing and we lost. No surprise then. 2009/12/16 Rog Rita rognr...@exemail.com.au $5 @ $19. Would have needed 6 noughts behind the 9 to have made it a value bet. Get the FA match fixing squad looking into this game. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 1:50 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How much did you wager Rog? At what odds? 2009/12/16 Rog Rita rognr...@exemail.com.au EXTREMELY THICK AND FCUKING GUTLESS. _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:33 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] I guess we'll know on Sunday - tactical genius or Thick Mick. Where's your money going Rog? _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:30 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] They can't...I was half joking but reading the reports it looks like MM copped some stick off our fans due to team selection. I kind of agree with what Macarthy has done here but it does leave you think that maybe with our full team we could of pulled off a surprise. I guess by replacing all ten outfield players, IF those players all return on Saturday they will be fresh and still have the confidence of two wins behind them. _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Taylor Sent: Wednesday, 16 December 2009 09:24 To: Wolves Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] How can it be understrength if all that played were fit. When you look at it, all of them except Hill have played this year. There's really nothing that can be done about it I feel. It's just that our second 11 isn't as good as Chelsea's or Man U's. Would they be complaining if we nabbed a point due to fresh legs? _ Subject: [NSWolves] Protest [sec=unclassified] Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:04:10 +1000 From: lee.mor...@defence.gov.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Apparently Chelsea have put in a formal protest about Wolves fielding an under strength team ;) -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid _ Find out how Use Messenger in your Hotmail inbox http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/hotmail/article/823454/web-im-for-hotmail -is-here -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. __ NOD32 2175 (20070409) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com http://www.eset.com/ -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
