There is no rule book but I think you need someone to win the ball if you're
having five attacking players. I don't think having the best ten outfield
players is the right approach
I watched the first half of the Chelsea game this morning and we played very
well. There was a bit of cat and mouse
where does it say in the rule book that you have to have a defensive
midfielder?
both SEB and Fletcher can cross the ball as good as any Wolves
winger
Hunt on the weekend when he came on had no speed about him to be
thought of as a winger, (I know he's com
Everyone moans about Mick playing people out of position. You have two
wingers playing as central midfielders and two strikers playing as wingers.
Plus you have no defensive midfielder to break up play or win the ball.
That's what's absurd.
On 25 October 2010 20:15, Andy wrote:
> 4-5-1, is
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick
[sec=unclassified]
What no Milijas?
4-5-1, is thta what MM is playing now!!!
so whats so absurd about that?
On 25/10/2010 1:28 PM, Steven Millward wrote:
That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever
seen proposed for Wolves.
ves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
If 451 seems too defensive just think of it as 433 with Jarvis, Doyle
and Hunt in the forward 3
Three strikers, two wingers and an attacking midfielder sounds nice but
who's go
>
> --
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 12:45
>
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
>
&
evin Doyle
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:45
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
If 451 seems too defensive just think of it as 433 with Jarvis, Doyl
idfield? That's proper Kevin
>> Keegan tactics that.
>>
>>
>> ----------
>>
>> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
>> Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT
>> *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 A
oglegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 1:37 PM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
>
>
>
> It's basically back to the old "two banks of five players" that they used
[mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 12:28
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
>
>That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever see
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 1:37 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
It's basically back to the old "two banks of five players" that they used in
the late nineteenth century. It might have won us the FA Cup
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
>
> *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
>
> What no Milijas?
>
> --
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry
> *Sent:* Mon
m] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:28
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen
proposed for Wolves.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[ma
, 25 October 2010 12:28
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen
proposed for Wolves.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
[mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
4-1-5 - everyone will be doing it soon.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 1:28 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
That
a bit harsh but so be it).
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Andy
> *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:48 AM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
>
>
That is, without doubt, the most absurd formation I've ever seen proposed
for Wolves.
>
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Andy
> *Sent:* Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick
Boo! Optimistic Marcus out!
_
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:53 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
It'll be december before you
It'll be december before you have any fun!!
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Sent: Mon Oct 25 12:44:45 2010
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
4 more games witout a win and I may consider the Priestood!
To:
Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Never seen you get fired up like this before Matty!! Are you on the
same arrangement as Paul Crowe where you see no action unless Wolves
win?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@google
Quiet morning!
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:29 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Never seen you get fired up
@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Fletcher's a striker. Play your best players in their best positions. If
Fletcher's not one of our best strikers (on ability and form) we
shouldn't then insist on finding him a place elsewhere in the team
beca
ber 2010 12:08 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Hi Leese, just my thoughts, how to get a good balance from the squad Wolves
have, Flether would be very good as a Attacking midfield player and Jarvis
plays more of a attacking winger/forward th
m] On
Behalf Of Andy
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:48 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
I wouldn't swap Jarvis with Milijas,
If any thing in the my formation I woul
AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
I wouldn't swap Jarvis with Milijas,
If any thing in the my formation I would proberly swap Fletcher with Jaris.
keep a straight 3 midfield, Fletcher can deliver some love through ball and can
get on the end
olves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
I wouldn't swap Jarvis with Milijas,
If any thing in the my formation I would proberly swap Fletcher with
Jaris. keep a straight 3 midfield, Fletcher can deliver some love
through ball and can get on the end of a pass o
tthew
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:36 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick
[sec=unclassified]
2 wingers (Hunt and
Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Ke
...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:38 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
Replace Jarvis with Milijas
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
LEESE Matthew
Sent
From:
nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
What no Mi
Reserve, didn't think he played that well on sat. seemed lost
On 25/10/2010 11:31 AM, Morris, Lee SGT wrote:
What no Milijas?
From:
nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Replace Jarvis with Milijas
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:36 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield
bject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
What no Milijas?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick
I
What no Milijas?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick
I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from o
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified]
I love his interviews on sky, he makes me laughshould our manager
really be making us laugh?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday
I love his interviews on sky, he makes me laughshould our manager
really be making us laugh?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 09:53
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: R
36 matches
Mail list logo
