Re: [NSWolves] Re: Not a negative post

2010-04-30 Thread Steven Millward
d to stay away in case they make people cry. On 30 April 2010 17:01, Rog & Reet wrote: > (they like to play attractive football so they will be looking at > different player to us anyway). Ouch. > > > > *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On

RE: [NSWolves] Re: Not a negative post

2010-04-30 Thread Rog & Reet
(they like to play attractive football so they will be looking at different player to us anyway). Ouch. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Friday, 30 April 2010 2:50 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Re: Not

Re: [NSWolves] Re: Not a negative post

2010-04-29 Thread Steven Millward
By the same argument they have also been relegated four times in eight years. On 30 April 2010 14:49, Marcus Chantry wrote: > I had thought about Forest coming up and there may be some sentimental > appeal for some players but probably not a direct competitor for players > (they like to play

RE: [NSWolves] Re: Not a negative post

2010-04-29 Thread Marcus Chantry
I had thought about Forest coming up and there may be some sentimental appeal for some players but probably not a direct competitor for players (they like to play attractive football so they will be looking at different player to us anyway). I still think Sandwell Town have more appeal than we giv