Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Thank you, friends, for answers.
To Hahns:
Can I make $$ envinroment behave like \startformula? In other words, to
no
redefine $$ to be substituted by \start-stop formula? Writing
\startformula and \stopformula every time is too verbose.
well, time spent
or { }
structure.counters = structure.counters or { }
structure.counters.collected = structure.counters.collected or { }
structure.counters.collected={
[@@si]={
{ 0, 0 },
},
endnote={
{ 0, 0, 0, 0 },
},
figure={
{ 0, 0 },
},
footnote={
{ 0, 0, 0, 0 },
},
formula={
{ 0, 0
Using a \pagereference in a displayed formula slightly changes the
horizontal spacing. The shift is small, roughly the thickness of an
integral sign. I don't know whether that's considered a bug.
Here is the test file. The control test file is the same but without
the \pagereference line
set just serried or broad instead of 4*broad in the second
or the third level, it seems to be ignored.
Is it normal?
i uploaded a new beta (also fixed some of the reported formula ref
problems)
can you test if itemize behaves as expected?
i jusy tested:
\setupitemgroup[itemize][2][color=blue
Hello!
I've tried the following example (from wiki):
\starttext
\startsubformulas[eq:1]
\placeformula[eq:first]
\startformula
c^2 = a^2 + b^2
\stopformula
\placeformula[eq:second]
\startformula
c^2 = a^2 + b^2
\stopformula
\stopsubformulas
Formula (\in[eq:1]) states
Hi all,
Say I have a formula that is numbered as 1.1. The problem is when I
use \in to refer to that formula, the reference only shows a number
1, and if interaction is enabled, the link does not work neither.
The following is the code I use:
\setupinteraction[state=start,focus=standard
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Mingyang Sun wrote:
Hi all,
Say I have a formula that is numbered as 1.1. The problem is when I
use \in to refer to that formula, the reference only shows a number
1, and if interaction is enabled, the link does not work neither.
Confirmed (in MKIV). I don't know how
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 05:15:52PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Mingyang Sun wrote:
Another question is, how to make formula number without the chapter
number?.
The usual way is to say
\setupformulas[way=bytext]
but that also seems to be broken in MKIV.
Ya
Mingyang Sun wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 05:15:52PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009, Mingyang Sun wrote:
Another question is, how to make formula number without the chapter
number?.
The usual way is to say
\setupformulas[way=bytext]
but that also seems to be broken
\index
entry (containing the simple math formula $k$) got cut off just
before the closing $ for some reason that I can't figure out.
Best wishes,
Taco
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add
. It looks like Xan's \index
entry (containing the simple math formula $k$) got cut off just
before the closing $ for some reason that I can't figure out.
btw, i noticed in one of the examples ...
{amplada+mitjan respecte de \mathematics k+1 valors}
so, that's then $k$ and not $k+1$
anyhow, what
put braces and do that enumeration formula is at middle
possition (not in first or last line, just in the middle). I use Aditya
manual but I did not see it.
Xan.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well
have MKII.
How can I put braces and do that enumeration formula is at middle possition
(not in first or last line, just in the middle). I use Aditya manual but I
did not see it.
Can you visually show what you want to achieve?
Aditya
\definetypeface[mine][rm][serif][modern][default]
\definetypeface[mine][mm][math] [lucida][default]
\setupbodyfont[mine]
\starttext
some text in latin modern and a simple formula in lucida new math:
$1+2=3$.
\stoptext
Wolfgang
Hi,
I found the solution to my problem about missing space between text and
a formula in MKII when using \indenting[next] (see
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20080424.112935.a81d9346.en.html),
however it seems to me that the proposed fix hasn't been applied to the
ConTeXt
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Bostjan Vesnicer wrote:
Hi,
I found the solution to my problem about missing space between text and a
formula in MKII when using \indenting[next] (see
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20080424.112935.a81d9346.en.html),
however it seems to me that the proposed
Hello,
References to formulas don't work in MKIV:
\placeformula[bla]
\startformula
a+b
\stopformula
\in[bla]
Mojca
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist :
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
References to formulas don't work in MKIV:
\placeformula[bla]
\startformula
a+b
\stopformula
\in[bla]
probably a few mire don't work; when i've released the new backend code
(in sync with new luatex version) i'll look into structure related
issues again
Hans
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 14:32, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
References to formulas don't work in MKIV:
\placeformula[bla]
\startformula
a+b
\stopformula
\in[bla]
probably a few mire don't work; when i've released the new backend code (in
sync with new luatex
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 02:21:18PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
References to formulas don't work in MKIV:
I think all references don't work, I can't get any references working,
not only to formulas.
Regards,
Khaled
--
Khaled Hosny
Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_ether) structure formula with PPCHTEX?
2) Is there any kind of repository, where I can take common structures
and/or adapt these to the required structures?
Regards,
Helge
I just came across your message from over a month ago...
Here is my solution (ConTeXt
Hi,
I have
\setupformulae[indentnext=auto]
but when I put a \startformula \stopformula in demo environment it does not
indent.
Why? What can I do for getting that?
My environment is:
\defineenumeration[demo][text={Demostració.\space},
number=no,location=serried,width=fit,headstyle=italic,
On Sat, 30 May 2009, Xan wrote:
Hi,
I have
\setupformulae[indentnext=auto]
but when I put a \startformula \stopformula in demo environment it does not
indent.
Why? What can I do for getting that?
My environment is:
\defineenumeration[demo][text={Demostració.\space},
Thanks Aditya, but it does not work what it should?
With:
\defineenumeration[demo][text={Demostració.\space},number=no,
location=serried,width=fit,headstyle=italic,indentnext=yes,
between=\blank,textdistance=.5em,closesymbol={\mathematics{\Box}},
style=normal,indenting=yes]
and
\starttext
.
PS: Please, CCme
I have
%Indentation
\setupheads[indentnext=yes]
\setupindenting[yes,small,first]
\setupformulae[indentnext=yes]
in headers.
if I put setupformulae[identnext=yes] and ident=yes for enumerations
_always_ have indenting after formula even if the text is following.
Xan
then
-- the magic 40 and it formula come from Dohyun Kim
local fontdata = tfmdata.shared.otfdata or tfmdata.shared.afmdata
local metadata = fontdata and fontdata.metadata
if metadata then
local italicangle = metadata.italicangle
if italicangle
at
ntg-context-ow...@ntg.nl
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of ntg-context digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Re: how to prevent header at page bottom (Wolfgang Schuster)
2. Re: interlinespace (Thomas A. Schmitz)
3. Re: formula-style
Am 17.05.2009 um 21:23 schrieb afsmith:
Hey again, ntg-context.
I would like to align one piece of a line to the left, and another
piece of the same line to the right, sort of like numbered math
equations, except not math.
Additionally I would like to do this inside a narrowed block
Thanks Wolfgang. That works...
Now how about inside a definition or subject header?
Here is an example. \localhsize in this case seems to resolve to a
width of 0, making the contained text break as often as it can...
\defineframed[lrframe][
width=\localhsize,
align=normal,
rulethickness=1pt]
Hey again, ntg-context.
I would like to align one piece of a line to the left, and another
piece of the same line to the right, sort of like numbered math
equations, except not math.
Additionally I would like to do this inside a narrowed block
How can I do this? I have tried
that the parameters should be handled identically.
no, that was actually the problem ... local vs global ... for the moment
set it up local (per formula) as i need to make an inheritance chain
now that i've split in mkii/mkiv that's easier since we no longer have
to keep things working in latex
the problem ... local vs global ... for the moment
set it up local (per formula) as i need to make an inheritance chain
now that i've split in mkii/mkiv that's easier since we no longer have
to keep things working in latex (which means that we can use more core
helper code)
just remind me
... local vs global ... for the moment
set it up local (per formula) as i need to make an inheritance chain
now that i've split in mkii/mkiv that's easier since we no longer have
to keep things working in latex (which means that we can use more core
helper code)
just remind me occasionally
OK
formula must have the settings; when i
have time i'll make a mkiv variant so that we can upgrade (i don't want
interference with mkii since that version is also used in latex and we
don't need to upgrade that)
\def\setchemicalattributes
{\scratchdimen\@@chemicalrulethickness
\def
. For example, see the attached image from the
empheq package for latex (I know Hans doesn't like to read big pdfs from
latex packages, hence the attached image ;-)
If framed could be incorporated into formula, we could easily create many
fancy boxes.attachment
display framed boxes. For example, see the attached image from the
empheq package for latex (I know Hans doesn't like to read big pdfs from
latex packages, hence the attached image ;-)
If framed could be incorporated into formula, we could easily create
many fancy boxes.
mframed is either
Hello,
I need to write some chemical strucutures in LaTeX and dont know, what is
the best tools to do it. The structures are crown ether and cryptands. Yes,
and I am unexperienced.
1) What would be the way to write a [18]crown-6
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_ether) structure formula
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_ether) structure formula with PPCHTEX?
2) Is there any kind of repository, where I can take common structures
and/or adapt these to the required structures?
see http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Chemistry
and http://mitglied.lycos.de/ppchtex/00index.html
Sorry, can't help you further
inside the \text in the formula setting ended up
messing with all the following *new* citations, recalling of already
mentioned citation was OK.
\cite citation withdrawn, everything was back to the normal.
Thanks for your help,
Nicolas
Le 16 Apr 2009 à 16:25, Nicolas Luchier a écrit :
Thank you
Dear all,
I need german Umlaute in my formulas of my master thesis.
I used \ddot{a} for ä. It had worked fine until I updated Context
yesterday :-(. Since that update I only get an crossed a with an accent,
but no ä.
I still use MKII.
Has anybody a solution for my little problem?
Thanks
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:01, Florian M. Baudach wrote:
Dear all,
I need german Umlaute in my formulas of my master thesis.
I used \ddot{a} for ä. It had worked fine until I updated Context
yesterday :-(. Since that update I only get an crossed a with an accent,
but no ä.
I still use
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Florian M. Baudach wrote:
Dear all,
I need german Umlaute in my formulas of my master thesis.
I used \ddot{a} for ä. It had worked fine until I updated Context
yesterday :-(. Since that update I only get an crossed a with an accent,
but no ä.
Here
\starttext
$\ddot a$
Aditya Mahajan schrieb:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Florian M. Baudach wrote:
Dear all,
I need german Umlaute in my formulas of my master thesis.
I used \ddot{a} for ä. It had worked fine until I updated Context
yesterday :-(. Since that update I only get an crossed a with an accent,
but no ä.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 20:14, Florian M. Baudach wrote:
Aditya Mahajan schrieb:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Florian M. Baudach wrote:
Dear all,
I need german Umlaute in my formulas of my master thesis.
I used \ddot{a} for ä. It had worked fine until I updated Context
yesterday :-(. Since that
I was trying to highlight a piece of a formula
using a gray background.
Use backgroundoffset, not frameoffset.
Ah! Because I used frame=off, I did not notice that frameoffset=5pt was
correctly moving the frame (rather than the background) outward. So,
thanks for the recipe; it works perfectly
In displayed math I was trying to highlight a piece of a formula using a
gray background. After a few spacing failures with \framed, I
discovered \mframed in the core-rul.tex source file. The comments there
say:
%D As usual, one can specify in what way the text should be
%D framed. One should
Hi Sanjoy, welcome back
In displayed math I was trying to highlight a piece of a formula
using a
gray background. After a few spacing failures with \framed, I
discovered \mframed in the core-rul.tex source file. The comments
there
say:
Use backgroundoffset, not frameoffset.
Wolfgang
the width of the box (like \start stop formula). In those cases you
need to specify width=something to \framed.
Of course, certain objects like floats, footnotes, marginpars, will never
work inside metapost. (I think you can get floats and footnotes to work,
but that will require some hackery
(like \start stop formula). In those cases you
need to specify width=something to \framed.
Of course, certain objects like floats, footnotes, marginpars, will never
work inside metapost. (I think you can get floats and footnotes to work,
but that will require some hackery)
Aditya
|},\quad\lambda \searrow 0,
\stopformula
Moreover, if $W_\infty=0$, then they are able to prove a similar formula for the higher Landau levels,
\startformula
\lim_{j\to\infty} \bigl(\pm j!(\lambda_{j,q}^{\pm}-\Lambda_q\bigr)^{1/j} = \frac{B_0}{2}\kap(K)^2,\quad q=0,1,\ldots.
\stopformula
this in MKIV? Is there copyright issues?
i have no problem with adding a conversion routine to mkiv, but not in
this form; what is the official formula? the original so to say? maybe
in pseudo c-code
Hans
one can write
\starttext
goedmorgen Hans! This is some maths formula: $a^2+b^2 = c^2$.
\stoptext
Therefore, in the same spirit one should have some default allowing
the user to write
\setupArabic[state=start]
\setupHanzi[state=start]
\starttext
goedmorgen Hans! This is some maths formula: $a^2
\starttext
goedmorgen Hans! This is some maths formula: $a^2+b^2 = c^2$.
\stoptext
Therefore, in the same spirit one should have some default allowing
the user to write
\setupArabic[state=start]
\setupHanzi[state=start]
\starttext
goedmorgen Hans! This is some maths formula: $a^2+b^2 = c^2
;
sure
Therefore, in the same spirit one should have some default allowing the
user to write
\setupArabic[state=start]
\setupHanzi[state=start]
\starttext
goedmorgen Hans! This is some maths formula: $a^2+b^2 = c^2$.
And this is some Arabic text written and typeset from right to left
Dear All,
sorry for a stupid question, the unicode math that is about to come
means formula input using Unicode Math instead of tex commands as
suggested in
Unicode Nearly Plain-Text Encoding of Mathematics
http://www.unicode.org/notes/tn28/UTN28-PlainTextMath-v2.pdf
or use of the Unicode
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Michail Vidiassov mas...@iaas.msu.ru wrote:
Dear All,
sorry for a stupid question, the unicode math that is about to come
means formula input using Unicode Math instead of tex commands as suggested
in
Unicode Nearly Plain-Text Encoding of Mathematics
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Michail Vidiassov wrote:
Dear All,
sorry for a stupid question, the unicode math that is about to come
means formula input using Unicode Math instead of tex commands as suggested
in
Unicode Nearly Plain-Text Encoding of Mathematics
http://www.unicode.org
Dear Mojca and All,
sorry for a stupid question, the unicode math that is about to come
means formula input using Unicode Math instead of tex commands as
suggested in Unicode Nearly Plain-Text Encoding of Mathematics
The answer to your question might as well be a tiny bit of yes because
I'm
2009/2/13 Yue Wang yuleo...@gmail.com:
Please upgrade your ConTeXt distribution.
I have done this, but it has an unexpected side effect. A tex-file
that worked without a problem, now gives:
systems : begin file NPW at line 130
! Math formula deleted: Insufficient symbol fonts
the bells and whistles
(take care of where the formula number is to be placed, and how how the
formula is to be aligned).
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
the Wiki
aditya is confident that it makes sense and works as expected it
will probably end up in the core, but as usual i'll wait till he sends
me an updated core file
It will be a while before I am able to get all the bells and whistles
(take care of where the formula number is to be placed, and how how
1) numbers in maths formula is Persian, possible?
2) is it hard to write a converter?
4) there are two footnote commands. one for persian and one for english.
persian footnotes will be on left and persian footnotes on right. also if
the first footnote in a page is persian, footnote rule
for the translation of Context an
excursion and it is suitable thought not complete.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Ilda Khaki ilda.kh...@gmail.com wrote:
1) numbers in maths formula is Persian, possible?
2) is it hard to write a converter?
4) there are two footnote commands. one for persian
Ilda Khaki wrote:
1) numbers in maths formula is Persian, possible?
luatex will have unicode math and then we can look into that (it does
not make sense to do that in traditional tex math)
2) is it hard to write a converter?
no, it's done in core-con.lua etc
4) there are two footnote
Can't we add a new mode to ConTeXt to use $ and in text
without escaping them with a backslash, is not needed
to write tables and for inline math \formula could be used.
In text only documents I want also the % as normal character
where I don't need comments. What do you think
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Can't we add a new mode to ConTeXt to use $ and in text
without escaping them with a backslash, is not needed
to write tables and for inline math \formula could be used.
Also add # to the list. Basically, we can just define a catcode regime
Am 17.12.2008 um 21:46 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Can't we add a new mode to ConTeXt to use $ and in text
without escaping them with a backslash, is not needed
to write tables and for inline math \formula could be used.
Also add # to the list
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Can't we add a new mode to ConTeXt to use $ and in text
without escaping them with a backslash, is not needed
to write tables and for inline math \formula could be used.
Also add # to the list. Basically, we can just
the distance to the line above gets increased!!!
TeX did this quite right, I think.
The bounding box of the inline formula looks ok.
Concerning your \high stuffs:
you can read the code and it is quite clear that the box dimension has
nothing to do with those within \high{}, no matter where
The next trick is dedicated to Aditya ...
% engine=luatex
\unprotect
\def\Hack#1#2%
{\pdfliteral{/Span /ActualText
\ctxlua{pdf.hexify(\!!bs\detokenize{#1}\!!es)} BDC}#2\pdfliteral{EMC}}
\protect
\def\Formula#1{\Hack{#1}{$#1$}}
\startTEXpage[offset=3pt]
test \Formula{e + a = mc^2
Hi,
this code
\setupformulas[location=left]
\placeformula \startformula
K = V + W(V) × S (Gleichung 1)
\stopformula
gives, as expected:
(1.1) K = V + W(V ) × S
But I need the following label (Gleichung means formula):
(Gleichung 1) K = V + W(V ) × S
How can this be done (in Mk II) ?
Thanks
Am 04.12.2008 um 12:46 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
this code
\setupformulas[location=left]
\placeformula \startformula
K = V + W(V) × S (Gleichung 1)
\stopformula
gives, as expected:
(1.1) K = V + W(V ) × S
But I need the following label (Gleichung means formula):
(Gleichung 1) K
the following label (Gleichung means formula):
(Gleichung 1) K = V + W(V ) × S
How can this be done (in Mk II) ?
In the same way as you do it in MkIV :)
\setupformulas[way=bytext]
\setuplabeltext[de][formula=Gleichung~]
Two remarks:
1) In this case the equation is not centered to textwidth anymore
:
(1.1) K = V + W(V ) × S
But I need the following label (Gleichung means formula):
(Gleichung 1) K = V + W(V ) × S
How can this be done (in Mk II) ?
In the same way as you do it in MkIV :)
\setupformulas[way=bytext]
\setuplabeltext[de][formula=Gleichung~]
Two remarks:
1) In this case
) × S (Gleichung 1)
\stopformula
gives, as expected:
(1.1) K = V + W(V ) × S
But I need the following label (Gleichung means formula):
(Gleichung 1) K = V + W(V ) × S
How can this be done (in Mk II) ?
In the same way as you do it in MkIV :)
\setupformulas[way=bytext]
\setuplabeltext[de
But I need the following label (Gleichung means formula):
(Gleichung 1) K = V + W(V ) × S
How can this be done (in Mk II) ?
In the same way as you do it in MkIV :)
\setupformulas[way=bytext]
\setuplabeltext[de][formula=Gleichung~]
Two remarks:
1) In this case the equation
But I need the following label (Gleichung means formula):
(Gleichung 1) K = V + W(V ) × S
How can this be done (in Mk II) ?
In the same way as you do it in MkIV :)
\setupformulas[way=bytext]
\setuplabeltext[de][formula=Gleichung~]
Two remarks:
1) In this case the equation
gives, as expected:
(1.1) K = V + W(V ) × S
But I need the following label (Gleichung means formula):
(Gleichung 1) K = V + W(V ) × S
How can this be done (in Mk II) ?
In the same way as you do it in MkIV :)
\setupformulas[way=bytext]
\setuplabeltext[de][formula=Gleichung~]
Two remarks
, as expected:
(1.1) K = V + W(V ) × S
But I need the following label (Gleichung means formula):
(Gleichung 1) K = V + W(V ) × S
How can this be done (in Mk II) ?
In the same way as you do it in MkIV :)
\setupformulas[way=bytext]
\setuplabeltext[de][formula=Gleichung~]
Two remarks:
1) In this case
\startformula
K = V + W(V) × S (Gleichung 1)
\stopformula
gives, as expected:
(1.1) K = V + W(V ) × S
But I need the following label (Gleichung means formula):
(Gleichung 1) K = V + W(V ) × S
How can this be done (in Mk II) ?
In the same way as you do it in MkIV :)
\setupformulas[way=bytext
Hello,
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
if formula_width + 2*label_width hsize
place formula in center of hsize, place label on right
else if formula_width + label_width hsize
DONT_KNOW
else
place formula in the center of hszie, place label one the next line
endif
I do not know what
Hi Jean and Gour,
Thanks for the comments. I would prefer muse, but
superscripts/subscripts are extremely common in biology, not just for
chemical formula, and maybe there are more things missing I didn't come
across so far. On the other hand, tables didn't work well in markdown
-- pandoc
Hi,
the following should be an equation with fraction.
typesetting it (mkii), there are now fractions
what's wrong? [apologies, my first mathml test]
\starttext
\startXMLdata
formula
math display='block'
semantics
mrow
mfrac
mrow
mover
miA/mi
mo#x2022;/mo
Hi,
the following should be an equation with fractions.
Typesetting it (MkII), there are NO (!) fractions!
What's wrong? [apologies, my first mathml test]
\starttext
\startXMLdata
formula
math display='block'
semantics
mrow
mfrac
mrow
mover
miA/mi
mo#x2022
the code with newmath.
Only one kind of formula with arrays gave errors.
I attach the respective formula as a doc file here.
Does anybody know a better way to deal with this kind of formulae in
ConTeXt?
Any help very much appreciated!!
Steffen
formula.doc
Description: MS-Word document
better tip very welcome!).
The best results I had with typesetting the code with newmath.
Only one kind of formula with arrays gave errors.
I attach the respective formula as a doc file here.
Does anybody know a better way to deal with this kind of formulae in
ConTeXt?
Any help very much
with
the Word plugin MathType, resp. with the different translator options (any
better tip very welcome!).
The best results I had with typesetting the code with newmath.
Only one kind of formula with arrays gave errors.
I attach the respective formula as a doc file here.
Does anybody know
MathType, resp. with the different translator
options (any
better tip very welcome!).
The best results I had with typesetting the code with newmath.
Only one kind of formula with arrays gave errors.
I attach the respective formula as a doc file here.
Does anybody know a better way to deal
If you are allowed to make some minor adjustments you may probably
even leave out most of the \cdot commands, which will turn the formula
even sleeker ...
Just my two cents,
Oliver
\starttext
\startformula
\frac{g_a}{\theta} =
\startcases[left={\left[},right={\right]}]
\NC
\starttext
\usemodule[chemic]
\setupchemical[size=small,scale=200,width=fit,frame=off]
\starttable[|c|]
\HL
\VL chemical formula \VL\AR
\HL
\VL
\startchemical
\chemical[SIX,B,C,R,RZ][R,R,R,R,R,R
,frame=off]
\starttable[|c|]
\HL
\VL chemical formula \VL\AR
\HL
\VL
\startchemical
\chemical[SIX,B,C,R,RZ][R,R,R,R,R,R]
\stopchemical
\VL\LR
\HL
\stoptable
\blank[line]
\setupTABLE[c][1][align
Hi,
There is a problem in formula numbers in RL direction. I mean in a formula the
direction of the number of formula is from left to right. I tried \mathdir TRT
and this problem disappeared but two new problems appeared. First, the hole
formula typesetted from right to left which shouldn't
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 10:21:10AM +, Mehdi Omidali wrote:
Hi,
There is a problem in formula numbers in RL direction. I mean in a formula the
direction of the number of formula is from left to right. I tried \mathdir TRT
and this problem disappeared but two new problems appeared. First
Thank you Khaled.
As you said we don't need \textdir in Xetex and I can use \pardir TRT
in this situation. I thought that maybe there is a simple setup for
sectioning number in context that I am not aware of. Any way, I have
translated The not so short introduction to latex to farsi and also
I am
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 05:49:31PM +0330, Mehdi Omidali wrote:
Hi everyone,
I want to use context+xetex for right-to-left typesetting and need to
know if it is possible to use the command \pagedir TRT in this
situation. (I tested that apparently only \pardir TRT is active).
If the answer of
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:31:38AM +0300, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 05:49:31PM +0330, Mehdi Omidali wrote:
Hi everyone,
I want to use context+xetex for right-to-left typesetting and need to
know if it is possible to use the command \pagedir TRT in this
situation. (I
Hi everyone,
I want to use context+xetex for right-to-left typesetting and need to
know if it is possible to use the command \pagedir TRT in this
situation. (I tested that apparently only \pardir TRT is active).
If the answer of the above question is negative I would like to know
how can I change
Mehdi Omidali wrote:
Hi everyone,
Another thing that have to be fixed is about formula numbering in
right-to-left texts. By default I think lua prints a formula number in
a formula in the wrong direction, like
\thechapter.\thesection.\theequation
but it should be
\theequation.\thesection
Mehdi Omidali wrote:
Dear Mojca,
Thanks to the conversion option I found a clean way to setup a good
left-to-right layout. But I found a mysterious bug in the
bidirectional algorithm. Please run the attached file and look at the
formula.
This definately looks like a bug in luatex itself
Hi everyone,
Another thing that have to be fixed is about formula numbering in
right-to-left texts. By default I think lua prints a formula number in
a formula in the wrong direction, like
\thechapter.\thesection.\theequation
but it should be
\theequation.\thesection.\thechapter
because chapter
801 - 900 of 1274 matches
Mail list logo
