I thought this was already implemented in context because of Hans's talk in
TUG 2010[1].
Thanks
[1] http://river-valley.tv/building-paragraphs-with-the-help-of-lua/
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
isha...@colostate.edu wrote:
**
Salaam, Vafa,
On Tue
There is one more problem with the default method:
\starttext
\setupalign[r2l]
\definefont[arabicfont][Arial*arabic at 20pt]
\setupdirections[bidi=global,method=default]
1.
\stoptext
from right to left perspective it prints 1. (dot after digit 1) as .1
(dot before digit 1) however
expected result. I am not sure if this
is the side effect of using \hbox dir TRT.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Vafa Khalighi persian-...@tug.org wrote:
Sorry that is not fixed. If you type two of these, the second one will be
broken.
\starttext
\setupalign[r2l]
\definefont[arabicfont
دومی
\stopitemize
\stoptext
and if I swap right and left parentheses, I get the following error:
error: .../context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/typo-dha.lua:184:
attempt to index local 'current' (a nil value)
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Vafa Khalighi persian-...@tug.org wrote:
I
: is it possible to change font automatically when
luatex sees a LTR word?
Thanks
Vafa Khalighi
test.tex
Description: TeX document
test.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
If your question is of interest to others
Hi
How do you use automatic and manual Kashide for Arabic in ConTeXt? I could
not find any documentation on this.
Thanks
Vafa Khalighi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
it is about stretching words.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 9/10/2013 2:59 PM, Vafa Khalighi wrote:
Hi
How do you use automatic and manual Kashide for Arabic in ConTeXt? I
could not find any documentation on this.
i have no clue what
Vafa Khalighi
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Vafa Khalighi persian-...@tug.org wrote:
Thanks. That is now fixed.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 9/10/2013 2:57 PM, Vafa Khalighi wrote:
Hi
The following document shows the wrong behaviour (the second
Thanks. That is now fixed.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 9/10/2013 2:57 PM, Vafa Khalighi wrote:
Hi
The following document shows the wrong behaviour (the second parentheses
is mirrored incorrectly and it should be after the number not before
Does ConTeXt allow users to typeset multipage tabular and if it does, then
can someone please tell me what kind of algorithm ConTeXt uses for these?
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
and if it does, then can someone please tell me what kind of algorithm
ConTeXt uses for these?
???
In TeX you can not have multi page tabular unless you program something. I
want to know about the ConTeXt algorithm of doing this. In LaTeX there are
two packages longtable and
thanks heaps for the details
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage :
Thanks a lot!!! The magic apparently works. I don't understand what
exactly the obeylines macro does (it seems that it just makes sure
that none of line endings get lost, not even inside definition
itself).
sometimes when you typeset a piece of text like poems, you actually want to
go to
What is the sense of \startPSTRICKS ... \stopPSTRICKS ?
Maybe he meant:
\startpspicture
\stoppspicture
The actual macros of pstricks are defined in pstricks.tex and that is all
Plain TeX. I myself generally would do something like this in Plain TeX
\input pstricks
\pspicture(0,0)(2,2)
You even can use LaTeX Plug-in of Gedit but it only recognises LaTeX commands
so if you write in ConTeXt or plain TeX, it will think that you have got a
master document.
But without the plug-in, you can do anything.
I agree with you. Gedit is the best editor. I wished that TeXworks also
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that ConTeXt has
heaps of bugs.
LaTeX rocks...!
Get a FREE AOL Email account with
I am on the wrong list because I just said ``LaTeX rocks''?
I would like to apologise you and anyone else from the bottom of my heart if I
have offended you and others, but honestly I did not mean it.
I am just on this list because I want to study ConText (its TeX programming)
more deeply.
17 matches
Mail list logo