Sietse wrote:
>> Alpha particles are \lohi[left]{40}{2}He.
Alain wrote:
> Someone needs to fix the wiki... (done!)
[Alain fixed the wiki to "Alpha particles are \lohi[left]{4}{2}He\high{2+}."]
But, but, but ... that doesn't demonstrate the fact that the elements
right-align instead of left-align
Le jeudi 18 octobre 2012, Alan BRASLAU a écrit :
> By the way, \lohi[left]{2}{4}He is somewhat a tautology, like all such
> isotopic nomenclature, as He ALWAYS has an atomic number of 2,
> otherwise it is not He (and U ALWAYS has an atomic number of 92,
> otherwise it is no longer U).
Sure but but
Le jeudi 18 octobre 2012, Sietse Brouwer a écrit :
> What about \lohi with the [left] key? That might serve your needs until
> Alan gets \chemistry to parse and typeset isotopes correctly.
Yes there are some "hacks" to typeset isotopes correctly, but I think it would
be better to be able to typese
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:41:00 +0200
Sietse Brouwer wrote:
> Alpha particles are \lohi[left]{40}{2}He.
Alpha particles are He\high{2+} (helium nucleus)
not to be confused with He\low{2} (helium molecules)
that DO exist but are unstable and only last 13 seconds or so.
Someone needs to fix the wiki
On 18-10-2012 00:20, Romain Diss wrote:
Le mercredi 17 octobre 2012, Alan BRASLAU a écrit :
Furiously, "breaking" many old curiosities,
fixing broken and incomplete functionality,
AND completely re-writing the documentation!
(Not that I really know much about chemistry myself... :)
Since you ta
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:20:01 +0200
Romain Diss wrote:
> Le mercredi 17 octobre 2012, Alan BRASLAU a écrit :
> > Furiously, "breaking" many old curiosities,
> > fixing broken and incomplete functionality,
> > AND completely re-writing the documentation!
> > (Not that I really know much about chemi
Le mercredi 17 octobre 2012, Alan BRASLAU a écrit :
> Furiously, "breaking" many old curiosities,
> fixing broken and incomplete functionality,
> AND completely re-writing the documentation!
> (Not that I really know much about chemistry myself... :)
Since you talk about chemistry, is there now a w
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:52:33 +0200
Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 17-10-2012 21:30, Marco Pessotto wrote:
>
> > Some things, like the chemical stuff, require someone who actually
> > does know what they are (I don't).
>
> Alan is currently reviewing the chemical subsystem.
Furiously, "breaking" many o
On 17-10-2012 21:30, Marco Pessotto wrote:
Hans Hagen writes:
On 17-10-2012 20:08, Marco Patzer wrote:
2012-10-17 Marco Pessotto:
Ok, this is my first bug report. I noticed that the column width/margin
is quite altered since TL12. There are some other problems, tough.
Full report here:
ht
Hans Hagen writes:
> On 17-10-2012 20:08, Marco Patzer wrote:
>> 2012-10-17 Marco Pessotto:
>>
>>> Ok, this is my first bug report. I noticed that the column width/margin
>>> is quite altered since TL12. There are some other problems, tough.
>>>
>>> Full report here:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/me
On 17-10-2012 20:08, Marco Patzer wrote:
2012-10-17 Marco Pessotto:
Ok, this is my first bug report. I noticed that the column width/margin
is quite altered since TL12. There are some other problems, tough.
Full report here:
https://github.com/melmothx/context-unofficial-test-suite/commit/857
On 17-10-2012 20:08, Marco Patzer wrote:
2012-10-17 Marco Pessotto:
Ok, this is my first bug report. I noticed that the column width/margin
is quite altered since TL12. There are some other problems, tough.
Full report here:
https://github.com/melmothx/context-unofficial-test-suite/commit/857
On 17-10-2012 19:58, Marco Pessotto wrote:
Ok, this is my first bug report. I noticed that the column width/margin
is quite altered since TL12. There are some other problems, tough.
Full report here:
https://github.com/melmothx/context-unofficial-test-suite/commit/8575456ae9e5dfe1f5dea5ac1224f
2012-10-17 Marco Pessotto:
> Ok, this is my first bug report. I noticed that the column width/margin
> is quite altered since TL12. There are some other problems, tough.
>
> Full report here:
>
> https://github.com/melmothx/context-unofficial-test-suite/commit/8575456ae9e5dfe1f5dea5ac1224f75b5d1
Ok, this is my first bug report. I noticed that the column width/margin
is quite altered since TL12. There are some other problems, tough.
Full report here:
https://github.com/melmothx/context-unofficial-test-suite/commit/8575456ae9e5dfe1f5dea5ac1224f75b5d1eb0a2
(It's stored in the commit log).
On 17-10-2012 18:57, Marco Pessotto wrote:
Marco Patzer writes:
Looking at the diffs, many of the differences are really tiny, but
differences exist nevertheless. It will take me some time to sort out
which ones are just tiny space shifting, and which ones give really
different output.
That'
Marco Patzer writes:
>> Looking at the diffs, many of the differences are really tiny, but
>> differences exist nevertheless. It will take me some time to sort out
>> which ones are just tiny space shifting, and which ones give really
>> different output.
>
> That's why I use a header for each te
2012-10-17 Marco Pessotto:
> luigi scarso writes:
>
> > It's not a huge difference, but it can integrated better with mkiv; see
> > http://meeting.contextgarden.net/2011/talks/day1_05_luigi_graphicmagick/
> > (if you like these kind of things)
>
> I think I'll have to run some benchmark to see
luigi scarso writes:
> It's not a huge difference, but it can integrated better with mkiv; see
> http://meeting.contextgarden.net/2011/talks/day1_05_luigi_graphicmagick/
> (if you like these kind of things)
I think I'll have to run some benchmark to see if it can save some
resources and speed up
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Marco Pessotto wrote:
> luigi scarso writes:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Marco Pessotto
> wrote:
> >
> > Aditya Mahajan writes:
> >
> > > It may be worthwhile to merge the two repos.
> >
> > I'm on my way. I'll keep you posted.
> >
> > Ca
luigi scarso writes:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Marco Pessotto wrote:
>
> Aditya Mahajan writes:
>
> > It may be worthwhile to merge the two repos.
>
> I'm on my way. I'll keep you posted.
>
> Can you use graphicsmagick ?
So far I've used imagemagick. I guess that i
> > A week ago I had a conversation with mpfusion and another user over IRC
> > about the ConTeXt test suite. mpfusion had a tarball with some test and
> > an elaborate machinery to see if the testfiles compile. He kindly
> > provided the tarball,
That's me, by the way.
> and I took the liberty t
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Marco Pessotto wrote:
> Aditya Mahajan writes:
>
> > It may be worthwhile to merge the two repos.
>
> I'm on my way. I'll keep you posted.
>
>
> Can you use graphicsmagick ?
--
luigi
_
Aditya Mahajan writes:
> It may be worthwhile to merge the two repos.
I'm on my way. I'll keep you posted.
--
Marco
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
mailli
On Sun, 7 Oct 2012, Marco Pessotto wrote:
Hello there!
TL;DR: https://github.com/melmothx/context-unofficial-test-suite
A week ago I had a conversation with mpfusion and another user over IRC
about the ConTeXt test suite. mpfusion had a tarball with some test and
an elaborate machinery to see
Hello there!
TL;DR: https://github.com/melmothx/context-unofficial-test-suite
A week ago I had a conversation with mpfusion and another user over IRC
about the ConTeXt test suite. mpfusion had a tarball with some test and
an elaborate machinery to see if the testfiles compile. He kindly
provided
26 matches
Mail list logo
