Hello Hans!
Thanks.
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 21:58, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > Not critical, just looking for ideas.
> Already there for ages ... testsuite goodies-002.tex + demo.lfg shows
> how to color your special characters ... one of the probably many
> unknown features -)
>
I was thinking goodi
On 1/29/2021 8:29 PM, Jano Kula wrote:
There are some Greek, Hebrew, etc. words used in the text. While
proofreading, the editor would like to check these words separately
(glyphs from different alphabets, unusual symbols, ...), so I'd like to
typeset the warning (margin note), where these wor
Hello to everybody!
Warning: 50 % of Greek glyphs in MWE, so they might be randomized :)
Is there any hook in the font fallback?
There are some Greek, Hebrew, etc. words used in the text. While
proofreading, the editor would like to check these words separately (glyphs
from different alphabets,
> On 3 Dec 2018, at 19:35, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>
> Hans Åberg schrieb am 03.12.18 um 19:22:
>> I can't get create a font fallback in the the example below, so some input
>> is welcome. It works when using STIX2 only (the commented out part), but
>> somehow the font name is not recogniz
Hans Åberg schrieb am 03.12.18 um 19:22:
I can't get create a font fallback in the the example below, so some input is
welcome. It works when using STIX2 only (the commented out part), but somehow
the font name is not recognized in the fallback, not when using what is listed
by 'mtxrun --scrip
I can't get create a font fallback in the the example below, so some input is
welcome. It works when using STIX2 only (the commented out part), but somehow
the font name is not recognized in the fallback, not when using what is listed
by 'mtxrun --script fonts --list --all'.
—
\definefontfamily
That solved it. For reference, I previously used the Texlive versions
bundled with Cygwin and Arch Linux.
/MJO
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 4/13/2018 3:38 PM, Magnus J wrote:
>>
>> This is even more weird (same setup as before)
>
> i uploaded a beta .. maybe that one w
On 4/13/2018 3:38 PM, Magnus J wrote:
This is even more weird (same setup as before)
i uploaded a beta .. maybe that one works better (at least we run the
same then)
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA
This is even more weird (same setup as before)
\starttext
wedge\wedge\footnote{wedge} prime\prime\footnote{prime} % <-- no
\wedge (question mark) in footnote, but \prime
\page
wedge\wedge\footnote{wedge} prime\prime\footnote{prime} % <--
\wedge and \prime
\page
wedge
Well that's even more odd. Is it visible in the attachment? Tested
with updated Acrobat Reader and Sumatra pdf viewer without any visible
\prime or \doubleprime, except in the footnote (where there is no
\wedge on the other hand)... Note that \prime is visible as a footnote
symbol, which is also in
On 4/13/2018 12:34 PM, Magnus J wrote:
$D\prime = 0.98$ % <-- no \prime in output
$D\doubleprime = 0.98$% <-- no \doubleprime in output
hm, i see primes here
-
Han
Thanks, I could have sworn I had tested that. With my new setup, I
still have trouble with some characters in math mode. Specifically, I
don't see the \prime and \doubleprime characters in math mode, and I
can't use \wedge as a footnote symbol.
Consider this commented example, pdf result attached.
On 4/12/2018 6:17 PM, Magnus J wrote:
I use Adobe Garamond Pro in combination with Termes Math for math (the
latter for missing glyphs, Garamond is not very complete). How can I
scale size of Termes Math without decreasing the size of the Garamond
glyphs in math mode?
/MJO
% define the
I use Adobe Garamond Pro in combination with Termes Math for math (the
latter for missing glyphs, Garamond is not very complete). How can I scale
size of Termes Math without decreasing the size of the Garamond glyphs in
math mode?
/MJO
% define the characters to use for Garamond in math mode
14 matches
Mail list logo
