I think I'll take comfort from your final comment - the output looks
good enough! But I remain intrigued.
Julian
On 24/5/22 17:26, Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context wrote:
you can ignore a lot of warnings if the output looks good enough.
Hi Julian,
Am 24.05.22 um 02:30 schrieb jbf via ntg-context:
I wonder if someone can help me interpret this message in the log file
fonts > start missing characters:
/home/jbf/bin/context/tex/texmf/fonts/opentype/public/tex-gyre/texgyrepagella-regular.otf
fonts > 88
I wonder if someone can help me interpret this message in the log file
fonts > start missing characters:
/home/jbf/bin/context/tex/texmf/fonts/opentype/public/tex-gyre/texgyrepagella-regular.otf
fonts > 88 U+00336 ̶ COMBINING LONG STROKE OVERLAY
fonts > stop
Dnia Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:17:33AM +0100, Taco Hoekwater napisa#322;(a):
Thanks for the answers; still, some things are not clear for me.
2. What does exactly sa mean? Do I get it right when I think that it's
the factor by which the body font size - i.e., some constant dimen
parameter
Dnia Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:55:42AM +0100, Thomas A. Schmitz napisa#322;(a):
Most of your questions are answered in the fonts manual:
If this were true, I wouldn't bother you... But mfonts.pdf is too
difficult for me to understand. My copy (I've even printed it!) is full
of comments with
Thanks for your answers!
I've started a page on the wiki
(http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Understanding_how_fonts_work_in_ConTeXt)
devoted to ConTeXt fontology. I will put there things I was able to
understand in ConTeXt's font mechanism. (Please be patient-I cannot
devote more than about half an
Dnia Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 02:08:48PM +0100, Mojca Miklavec napisa#322;(a):
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
(And I really don't know what advantages in terms of XML I would get...)
About 10 times easier to write definitions to transform XML into a
valid ConTeXt
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 21:58:24 +0100
Marcin Borkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dnia Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 02:08:48PM +0100, Mojca Miklavec napisa#322;(a):
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
(And I really don't know what advantages in terms of XML I would get...)
Dnia Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 10:09:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster napisa#322;(a):
The new xml handler is currently only described in the Mark manual [1],
you could also find examples on the normal and the developer list.
The rest is only documented in the source files and in modules.
[1]
OK, so the first part of my questions about mfonts.pdf;)
Thank you in advance for the answers; I'd like to stress that I'm not in
a hurry, so please take your time! Also, as I said, I have nothing
against being redirected to some other part of documentation in case
it is easier than to write a
Dnia Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 05:22:18PM -0700, Idris Samawi Hamid napisa#322;(a):
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:17:23 -0700, Marcin Borkowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
better consider switching to luatex/context mkiv then -)
Well, I'm a bit afraid of its experimental status..
Don't
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
(And I really don't know what advantages in terms of XML I would get...)
About 10 times easier to write definitions to transform XML into a
valid ConTeXt document (to write definitions in such a way that
ConTeXt will understand the XML)
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 14:08:48 +0100
Mojca Miklavec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
(And I really don't know what advantages in terms of XML I would get...)
About 10 times easier to write definitions to transform XML into a
valid ConTeXt
Hi all!
I'm going to start using ConTeXt; I've been planning to do so for a few
years, but now I finally have Internet access at home, so it's easier
for me to look things up in the wiki (or ask here;)).
I have two questions. The first one is connected with fonts. I can't
understand ConTeXt's
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi all!
I'm going to start using ConTeXt; I've been planning to do so for a few
years, but now I finally have Internet access at home, so it's easier
for me to look things up in the wiki (or ask here;)).
I have two questions. The first one is connected with fonts.
Dnia Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:54:46PM +0100, Hans Hagen napisa#322;(a):
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi all!
I'm going to start using ConTeXt; I've been planning to do so for a few
years, but now I finally have Internet access at home, so it's easier
for me to look things up in the wiki (or
Dnia Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:57:30PM +0100, Hans Hagen napisa#322;(a):
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
1) when I substituted pagella for palatino, it stopped working;
pagella has no typescripts, as long as gyre is not finished, we overload
the traditional fonts (font file remapping)
2) and
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:17:23 -0700, Marcin Borkowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
better consider switching to luatex/context mkiv then -)
Well, I'm a bit afraid of its experimental status..
Don't be, its bark is worse than its bite... I use it for production
purposes (opentype,
David Wooten wrote:
Hmm, well I seem to have figured something out:
the line
\switchtobodyfont[jenson,12pt]
used to work. When replaced with
\switchtotypeface[jenson][12pt]
it now once again does the trick.
Is the problem specific to the jenson typeface?
Taco
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
David Wooten wrote:
Hmm, well I seem to have figured something out:
the line
\switchtobodyfont[jenson,12pt]
used to work. When replaced with
\switchtotypeface[jenson][12pt]
it now once again does the trick.
Is the problem specific to
Hmm, well I seem to have figured something out:
the line
\switchtobodyfont[jenson,12pt]
used to work. When replaced with
\switchtotypeface[jenson][12pt]
it now once again does the trick.
dw
David Wooten wrote:
Greetings all,
In the last week or so I started having a
Greetings all,
In the last week or so I started having a problem with fonts: what once
worked stopped doing so, giving me the default font rather than my
chosen fonts. I finally figured out that it is only certain sizes that
are not working. For example, with:
\usetypescriptfile[jensonpro]
WN wrote:
Hi,
I am reading the mfonts.pdf manual to understand more about Context font
mechanism.
In section 10 Math collection, Hans writes
Math is a complicated matter and therefore we will not spend that many
words on the gory details ..
.
More information can be found in the
I use a lot of mathematics i.e a lot of integral symbols (\oint,
\oiint, \oiiint ) for my documentation.
I could not find the corresponding Context math symbols. I suppose they
are not defined as yet ?
Furthermore I use a small tex module written by David Munger and which
I posted
on this
WN wrote:
I use a lot of mathematics i.e a lot of integral symbols (\oint, \oiint,
\oiiint ) for my documentation.
I could not find the corresponding Context math symbols. I suppose they are
not defined as yet ?
No, they are not. I already noticed this question last time, but
didn't know
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
I want to use palatino text with euler math in my document. This is
how I proceed.
1. I downloaded latest mswincontext environment from pragma website.
2. To test if palatino works correctly, I tested the simple document.
%-
\usetypescript[palatino][texnansi]
26 matches
Mail list logo
