Re: [NTG-context] Footnotes in MkIV and MkII

2010-10-29 Thread Hans Hagen
On 29-10-2010 12:52, Matija Šuklje wrote: Dne petek 29. oktobra 2010 ob 00:42:20 je Hans Hagen napisal(a): On 29-10-2010 12:17, Matija Šuklje wrote: Hullo, from what I can understand I'm using \footnote correctly (i.e. as on wiki), but if I generate the document with 'context' every footnote

Re: [NTG-context] Footnotes in MkIV and MkII

2010-10-29 Thread Matija Šuklje
Dne petek 29. oktobra 2010 ob 11:24:36 je Hans Hagen napisal(a): first update then Will do, thanks :) Cheers, Matija -- gsm:+386 41 849 552 www:http://matija.suklje.name xmpp: matija.suk...@gabbler.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[NTG-context] Footnotes in MkIV and MkII

2010-10-28 Thread Matija Šuklje
Hullo, from what I can understand I'm using \footnote correctly (i.e. as on wiki), but if I generate the document with 'context' every footnote instance is just a direct copy of the first footnote. If I generate it with 'texexec' though, the footnotes are generated as expected. Is that a

Re: [NTG-context] Footnotes in MkIV and MkII

2010-10-28 Thread Hans Hagen
On 29-10-2010 12:17, Matija Šuklje wrote: Hullo, from what I can understand I'm using \footnote correctly (i.e. as on wiki), but if I generate the document with 'context' every footnote instance is just a direct copy of the first footnote. If I generate it with 'texexec' though, the footnotes

Re: [NTG-context] Footnotes in MkIV and MkII

2010-10-28 Thread Matija Šuklje
Dne petek 29. oktobra 2010 ob 00:42:20 je Hans Hagen napisal(a): On 29-10-2010 12:17, Matija Šuklje wrote: Hullo, from what I can understand I'm using \footnote correctly (i.e. as on wiki), but if I generate the document with 'context' every footnote instance is just a direct copy of