Hello,
Here are some of my observations about Lucida fonts (font part for
now; math part comes later). I made a detailed check of files that are
present on CTAN.
I don't know how Hans' metric files look like, but:
- texfont --ve=yandy ... doesn't do anything here
- texfont --ve=bh ... creates a b
On 19-2-2010 19:57, Martin Schröder wrote:
2010/2/19 Hans Hagen:
Maybe the minimals should ship those lucida math tfm files (i don't know if
there are vf files too). I'm not going to buy new lucida math fonts.
You get the new fonts for free if you already have the old ones (I
must find these d
2010/2/19 Hans Hagen :
> Maybe the minimals should ship those lucida math tfm files (i don't know if
> there are vf files too). I'm not going to buy new lucida math fonts.
You get the new fonts for free if you already have the old ones (I
must find these discs :-).
http://www.tug.org/store/lucida
On 19-2-2010 17:25, Mikael Persson wrote:
This is a bit funny, because the problem that Troy has with upright
math seems to be exactly the same problem I have with mathdesign,
described in the post
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20100217.211052.21a3f6f3.en.html
depends ... as long as
On 19-2-2010 18:13, Troy Henderson wrote:
Now, by following these steps, I am able to successfully create
ConTeXt documents with Lucida fonts (with and without math) using MKII
(texexec). However, using the same document with MKIV (context), the
document builds fine, all text and math is Lucida
> how did you set up your lucida fonts in mkiv?
First of all, I did not setup Lucida for MKIV (specifically). The
following fonts come with the complete Lucida set from TUG:
46 AFM's
41 PFB's
42 PFM's
164 TFM's
63 VF's
I placed all 356 of these font files into the same directory (ignoring
direc
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 19-2-2010 14:50, Troy Henderson wrote:
>>
>> I am a LaTeX user for about 15 years, but I am very new ConTeXt. I am
>> having trouble using the complete set of Lucida fonts purchased from
>> TUG.
>>
>> http://www.tug.org/store/lucida/
>>
>> I
On 19-2-2010 14:50, Troy Henderson wrote:
I am a LaTeX user for about 15 years, but I am very new ConTeXt. I am
having trouble using the complete set of Lucida fonts purchased from
TUG.
http://www.tug.org/store/lucida/
I have followed the first set of instructions at
http://wiki.contextgarden
On 19-2-2010 14:50, Troy Henderson wrote:
I am a LaTeX user for about 15 years, but I am very new ConTeXt. I am
having trouble using the complete set of Lucida fonts purchased from
TUG.
http://www.tug.org/store/lucida/
I have followed the first set of instructions at
http://wiki.contextgarden
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Troy Henderson wrote:
> I am a LaTeX user for about 15 years, but I am very new ConTeXt. I am
> having trouble using the complete set of Lucida fonts purchased from
> TUG.
>
> http://www.tug.org/store/lucida/
>
> I have followed the first set of instructions at
>
> When building the same document (that works for MKIV)
Typo. I mean that work for MKII
> with MKIV (context), the text fonts are ...
Troy
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
I am a LaTeX user for about 15 years, but I am very new ConTeXt. I am
having trouble using the complete set of Lucida fonts purchased from
TUG.
http://www.tug.org/store/lucida/
I have followed the first set of instructions at
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Lucida
and the fonts work great for MK
Solved. \enablemathcollection[lbr] does the trick. Thanks to everybody.
-
Jerónimo Alaminos Prats
Dpto. Análisis Matemático
Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad de Granada
Granada - 18071
alami...@ugr.es
_
El 24/12/2008, a las 16:59, Wolfgang Schuster escribió:
Am 24.12.2008 um 09:40 schrieb Jerónimo Alaminos Prats:
El 24/12/2008, a las 0:33, Aditya Mahajan escribió:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Jerónimo Alaminos Prats wrote:
Hello,
I have been using the lucida fonts without problems for a long
Am 24.12.2008 um 09:40 schrieb Jerónimo Alaminos Prats:
El 24/12/2008, a las 0:33, Aditya Mahajan escribió:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Jerónimo Alaminos Prats wrote:
Hello,
I have been using the lucida fonts without problems for a long
time. They work like a charm with mactex 2007 but moving
El 24/12/2008, a las 0:33, Aditya Mahajan escribió:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Jerónimo Alaminos Prats wrote:
Hello,
I have been using the lucida fonts without problems for a long
time. They work like a charm with mactex 2007 but moving to the
2008 version I've found that some math symbols ar
El 24/12/2008, a las 0:33, Aditya Mahajan escribió:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Jerónimo Alaminos Prats wrote:
Hello,
I have been using the lucida fonts without problems for a long
time. They work like a charm with mactex 2007 but moving to the
2008 version I've found that some math symbols are
tug version will work in both mkiv and mkii. (I mean luatex 0.30.0)
in the future I think we should suggest TUG to distribute opentype
version of the font (including converting the math glyphs into
opentype math table).
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Mohamed Bana
wrote:
> sorry i'm stealing you
Well, he use pdftex to process the file.
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Jerónimo Alaminos Prats wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have been using the lucida fonts without problems for a long time. They
>> work like a charm with mactex 2007 but moving to the
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Jerónimo Alaminos Prats wrote:
Hello,
I have been using the lucida fonts without problems for a long time. They
work like a charm with mactex 2007 but moving to the 2008 version I've found
that some math symbols are shuffled or simply do not appear in the pdf. For
examp
Am 23.12.2008 um 21:07 schrieb Jerónimo Alaminos Prats:
Hello,
I have been using the lucida fonts without problems for a long time.
They work like a charm with mactex 2007 but moving to the 2008
version I've found that some math symbols are shuffled or simply do
not appear in the pdf. F
sorry i'm stealing your thread, but i'm thinking of buying the lucida
fonts with maths, which version works with luatex and which one works
with mkii, please provide a link for both.
Jerónimo Alaminos Prats wrote:
Hello,
I have been using the lucida fonts without problems for a long time.
Th
Hello,
I have been using the lucida fonts without problems for a long time.
They work like a charm with mactex 2007 but moving to the 2008 version
I've found that some math symbols are shuffled or simply do not
appear in the pdf. For example, \midint compiles correctly but do not
appear
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Eric DÉTREZ wrote:
>> I sent this message last week.
>
> I am pushing this message up for you just so someone else
> can have a look at it. But there is one thing I can say
> for sure: texfont does not crea
Hi Eric,
Eric DÉTREZ wrote:
> I sent this message last week.
I am pushing this message up for you just so someone else
can have a look at it. But there is one thing I can say
for sure: texfont does not create a typescript for you
(it predates typescripts) so you (or someone) have to create
that
I sent this message last week.
*
Hello
I know that I disturb a lot this list, please forgive me.
I tried to install a new mac.
I donwloaded mactex (2008)
I installed lucida fons in ~/Library/texmf/
then I typed "sudo mktexlsr"
Hi Hans:
>
> mkiv automatically uses the afm files (only uses tfm for fonts that have
> no afm or are seen as kind of special)
>
Well, I aware.. but my question is:
can we use the definition in type-buy.tex directly without any manual
verbose typescript definition if we use afms instead of tfms?
Yue Wang wrote:
> I already mailed the tfms to the mailing list month ago~ but I dont
> know how to upload it to the garden:( pls tell me how.
>
> (In fact, the tfms works in both MKIV and MKII, however, I think in
> MKIV we can use the afms and pfbs shipped by TUG directly.
> Maybe Hans can modi
I already mailed the tfms to the mailing list month ago~ but I dont
know how to upload it to the garden:( pls tell me how.
(In fact, the tfms works in both MKIV and MKII, however, I think in
MKIV we can use the afms and pfbs shipped by TUG directly.
Maybe Hans can modify the type-buy.tex so that
Hello
I know that I disturb a lot this list, please forgive me.
I tried to install a new mac.
I donwloaded mactex (2008)
I installed lucida fons in ~/Library/texmf/
then I typed "sudo mktexlsr" and "sudo updmap-sys --enable Map
lucida.map" in terminal
All is fine with plain TeX, I can use my l
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Yue Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You should use \usetypescriptfile[type-buy] first~
> texfont won't do everything for you, it will not process math fonts.
> but you can use my tfms again for lucida:)
Maybe we could create a module on the garden with lucida tfms
You should use \usetypescriptfile[type-buy] first~
texfont won't do everything for you, it will not process math fonts.
but you can use my tfms again for lucida:)
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I know that I disturb a lot this list, please forgiv
Le 3 août 08 à 10:42, Eric DÉTREZ a écrit :
>
> Le 3 août 08 à 08:38, Yue Wang a écrit :
>
>> The attachment is all the file you need except the pfbs.
>> extract it to texmf-fonts directory, and mkdir texmf-fonts/fonts/
>> type1
>> copy all the pfb type1 files there,
>> and run texhash.
>
> don
Hi:
>
> Compilation says " ! I can't find file `texnansi-raw-lbf' "
> It's better than before : it didn't do anything :-)
>
Update the ConTeXt distribution to the latest version.
It should be work.
If you don't know your distribution well, Ask mojca for help.
She is the minimals distribution deve
Hi:
> How did you install ConTeXt? Is it included in texshop? Could you try
> with texfont?
>
TeXShop is just an editor like TeXWorks.
It has nothing to do with ConTeXt and friends.
Yue Wang
___
If your question is
Hi:
In this situation, texfont is not enough:)
because texfont can not handle math fonts.
Yue Wang
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Renaud Aubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Compilation says " ! I can't find file `texnansi-raw-lbf' "
>> It's better than before : it didn't do anything :-)
>>
>
Eric DÉTREZ a écrit :
>
> I don't use texfont
> I compile files from texshop
Ok, I have no knowledge at all regarding texshop, sorry...
>
>> - did your pfb files are in a single directory or not ? ...
> yes they are with names lbc.pfb and so on
This one was only relevant using texfont...
>
> I had
Le 3 août 08 à 11:06, Renaud Aubin a écrit :
>
>> Compilation says " ! I can't find file `texnansi-raw-lbf' "
>> It's better than before : it didn't do anything :-)
>>
> Hi Eric,
>
> It may help us if you give us more details:
> - the texfont command used,
I don't use texfont
I compile files fro
> Compilation says " ! I can't find file `texnansi-raw-lbf' "
> It's better than before : it didn't do anything :-)
>
Hi Eric,
It may help us if you give us more details:
- the texfont command used,
- did your pfb files are in a single directory or not ? ...
- ...
A good test is:
\startMPenviron
Yue Wang wrote:
> OK,
>
> I try to mail the zip file containing the tfms and map file to the
> mailing list but I got the following:
>
> Your mail to 'ntg-context' with the subject
>Re: [NTG-context] Lucida (from a newbie) question
> Is being held until th
Le 3 août 08 à 08:38, Yue Wang a écrit :
> Hi, Eric:
>
> You should have all the tfms generated.
Yes, they are in the fonts/type1/bh/lucida directory
> The attachment is all the file you need except the pfbs.
> extract it to texmf-fonts directory, and mkdir texmf-fonts/fonts/type1
> copy all the
OK,
I try to mail the zip file containing the tfms and map file to the
mailing list but I got the following:
Your mail to 'ntg-context' with the subject
Re: [NTG-context] Lucida (from a newbie) question
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
So I mail Er
Hello
I'm trying to switch from plain TeX (with my own set of macros) to
ConTeXt.
I bought the Lucida fonts and I wish ti use them.
I don't find how to do this on my Mac-Live with TexShop install.
I promise I've read anything I could find on the ConTeXt wiki.
Thank's by advance.
__
\define\tildedomega{\hbox{$\tilde{\bfm \omega}$}} and use \tildedomega
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
ok, but then omega is not bold anymore...
Taco Hoekwater a écrit :
>
>
>Adding this redefinition of \bfm helps
>
> \def\bfm{\noexpand\boldfacemath} % \noexpand added
>
>Taco
>___
>ntg-context mailing list
>ntg-context@ntg.nl
>http://www.ntg.nl/mailm
Correction: the problem occurs only with align
Renaud AUBIN a écrit :
Hi all,
Considering the following example, there is a problem with \bfm \omega
in the align environment... I observed the same problem with the matrix
environment... Any idea how to solve the problem ?
\startt
Renaud AUBIN wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Considering the following example, there is a problem with \bfm \omega
> in the align environment... I observed the same problem with the matrix
> environment... Any idea how to solve the problem ?
Adding this redefinition of \bfm helps
\def\bfm{\noexpand
Hi all,
Considering the following example, there is a problem with \bfm \omega
in the align environment... I observed the same problem with the matrix
environment... Any idea how to solve the problem ?
\starttext
\usetypescript[lucida] [texnansi]
\usetypescript[lucidabfm] [texnansi]
\usetypes
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> But then again I didn't understand how it was possible that so many
> people were using lucida without any problems. (And that it was only
> me who had problems installing the font - I simply took all the files
> from the "LaTeX world" and forgot about using texfont, which c
On 7/31/06, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> > Helin Gai wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'm trying to set up ConTeXt to use the Lucida Bright Font. I've
> >> already installed the font in the "LaTeX way" and it works pretty
> >> well in LaTeX. But when I use the following:
On 7/31/06
Helin Gai wrote:
> Weird, the method you proposed actually doesn't work...
>
> Sincerely,
> Colin
>
> On Jul 31, 2006, at 11:10 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>
>> Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>>
>>> Helin Gai wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up ConTeXt to use the Lucida Bri
Weird, the method you proposed actually doesn't work...
Sincerely,
Colin
On Jul 31, 2006, at 11:10 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>> Helin Gai wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to set up ConTeXt to use the Lucida Bright Font. I've
>>> already installed the font in the "LaTe
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Helin Gai wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to set up ConTeXt to use the Lucida Bright Font. I've
>> already installed the font in the "LaTeX way" and it works pretty
>> well in LaTeX. But when I use the following:
>>
>
> As far as I know, using only this comm
Problem Solved.
\usetypescriptfile[type-buy] % loads commercial font definitions
\usetypescript[lucida][texnansi] % defines a lucida typeface
\setupbodyfont[lucida,12pt]
This worked.
Colin
On Jul 31, 2006, at 5:28 PM, Helin Gai wrote:
> I wrote a typescriptfile according to the manual of TeXf
I wrote a typescriptfile according to the manual of TeXfont (attached
below) and with the following code
\usetypescriptfile[lucida]
\definetypeface[lucida][rm][serif][lucida][default][encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface[lucida][ss][sans] [lucida][default][encoding=texnansi]
\setupbodyfont[lucida,
Helin Gai wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to set up ConTeXt to use the Lucida Bright Font. I've
> already installed the font in the "LaTeX way" and it works pretty
> well in LaTeX. But when I use the following:
As far as I know, using only this command should have worked:
\setupbodyfont
Hi all,
I'm trying to set up ConTeXt to use the Lucida Bright Font. I've
already installed the font in the "LaTeX way" and it works pretty
well in LaTeX. But when I use the following:
\usetypescriptfile [type-buy]
\loadmapfile[texnansi-bh-lucida.map]
\usetypescript[lbr]%[texnansi]
\setupbodyf
Hans et al,
I think I have Lucida installed. We'll see how it holds up in the
future.
David Arnold
College of the Redwoods
Mathematics Department
Eureka, CA 95501
(707) 476-4222
http://online.redwoods.edu/instruct/darnold/
___
ntg-context mailing
David Arnold wrote:
All,
Now that YandY is defunct, where would one now purchase the Lucida
font. We used to be able to get the entire set from YandY, math
included. Does that set still exist and where can it be purchased?
http://www.tug.org/yandy/
says that tug is negotiating ...
(afa
On Nov 23, 2005, at 9:47 PM, David Arnold wrote:
Now that YandY is defunct, where would one now purchase the Lucida
font. We used to be able to get the entire set from YandY, math
included. Does that set still exist and where can it be purchased?
The set with math will soon be available fr
All,
Now that YandY is defunct, where would one now purchase the Lucida
font. We used to be able to get the entire set from YandY, math
included. Does that set still exist and where can it be purchased?
David
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-con
Arun Swarup wrote:
Hi,
do i have to buy the lucida font for ConTeXt?
im using TeXLive 2003 ConTeXt installation, and ConTeXt gives me rough
(T3) fonts in the pdf file ...
dont even ask about the .dvi ... it cant find some font files
i've stopped trying to use lucida & have contended myself wi
Hi,
do i have to buy the lucida font for ConTeXt?
im using TeXLive 2003 ConTeXt installation, and ConTeXt gives me rough
(T3) fonts in the pdf file ...
dont even ask about the .dvi ... it cant find some font files
i've stopped trying to use lucida & have contended myself with CM :(
-arun
It seems that nothing is known yet, you should subscribe/ask on
the yandytex support mailing list, I guess. It is linked from
http://tug.org/yandy
Greetings, Taco
Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi,
Now that yandy has gone into a more fancy business (www.yandy.com,
looking at the menu it looks like they
Hi,
Now that yandy has gone into a more fancy business (www.yandy.com, looking at
the menu it looks like they now also sell special latex stuff -) i wonder where
one can get the usual bunch of lucida fonts needed for tex; any ideas?
Hans
--
For right now, I am giving up on the postscript fonts. Lets try something else.
At http://home1.vr-web.de/~was/lucidayy/, you will see some files that tell you how to
use the Lucida Bright fonts that come with StartOffice 5.2 with LaTeX.
I copied all the pfb and afm files from StarOffice52 into
Dear context users,
Does anyone have experience in setting up Gerben Wierda's gwTex for Mac
OS X to use ConTeXt and lucida bright fonts? Could you advice me where
to buy the fontset for Mac OS X? And can anyone offer me a pointer to
good step-by-step recipe to convert and install the fontset? I
All,
I am running Miktex on Windows. I took my YandY lucida fonts (pfb and afm
files) and put them in a temporary directory, f:\temp\fonts\lucida on my
system.
I then ran:
texfont --fontroot=f:\localtexmf --sourcepath=f:\temp\fonts\lucida
--vendor=yandy --collection=lucida --makepath --install
David Arnold wrote:
Hi David,
With MikTeXt you have to install the font. The easiest way is to use
texfont.
Have a look at the My Way "Texfont Examined" by Adam Lindsay at the
ConTeXt Portal
http://www.pragma-ade.com:8080/context/MyWays
It's for texlive on linux but you should be able understand
Bill,
This:
\setupoutput[pdf]
\usetypescript[berry][ec]
\usetypescript[lbr]
\setupbodyfont[lbr]
\starttext
Hello.
\stoptext
Leads to this:
) (F:\miktex\tex\context\base\type-spe.tex)
(F:\miktex\tex\context\base\type-exa.tex))makemf --verbose ec-lbr
cannot find ec-lbr source file.
hbf2gf
On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 12:10:10 -0700
David Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> \usetypescript[lbr]
> \setupbodyfont[lbr]
I can't test it because I don't have Lucida, but what happens if you add
this before the statements above:
\usetypescript[berry][ec]
-Bill
--
Sattre Press
Hello,
I am using the latest version of Miktex. This compiles just fine using
pdflatex.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{lucidabr}
\begin{document}
Now is the time.
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:1}
f(x)=x^2-2x-3.
\end{equation}
\end{document}
But I don't understand how to use my Lucida
101 - 172 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
