On 4-6-2011 2:24, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Jun 4, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4-6-2011 10:21, R. Ermers wrote:
Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid, which
is contrary to the docbook philosophy), using the cals table module and the
directives is
Op 4 jun 2011, om 14:24 heeft Aditya Mahajan het volgende geschreven:
>
> On Jun 4, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> On 4-6-2011 10:21, R. Ermers wrote:
>>
>>> Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid,
>>> which is contrary to the docbook philosophy), us
On Jun 4, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 4-6-2011 10:21, R. Ermers wrote:
>
>> Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid,
>> which is contrary to the docbook philosophy), using the cals table module
>> and the directives is not enough, at least the cals
Op 4 jun 2011, om 11:06 heeft Hans Hagen het volgende geschreven:
> On 4-6-2011 10:21, R. Ermers wrote:
>
>> Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid,
>> which is contrary to the docbook philosophy), using the cals table module
>> and the directives is not enough,
On 4-6-2011 10:21, R. Ermers wrote:
Adding the prefix cals: to the tag names (thus making the file invalid, which
is contrary to the docbook philosophy), using the cals table module and the
directives is not enough, at least the cals tables in my valid xml docbook
document were never typeset.
Op 3 jun 2011, om 18:28 heeft Hans Hagen het volgende geschreven:
> On 3-6-2011 5:43, R. Ermers wrote:
>
>> I tried typesetting docbook with Context, it can be done, I but got stuck on
>> the cals tables and some other things. Cals tables can be processed, albeit
>> as separate documents only
On 3-6-2011 5:43, R. Ermers wrote:
I tried typesetting docbook with Context, it can be done, I but got stuck on
the cals tables and some other things. Cals tables can be processed, albeit as
separate documents only - not as part of the docbook file - and then imported
as pdf files. This was t
I tried typesetting docbook with Context, it can be done, I but got stuck on
the cals tables and some other things. Cals tables can be processed, albeit as
separate documents only - not as part of the docbook file - and then imported
as pdf files. This was too cumbersome for me, and does not agr
On 2-6-2011 7:17, Bruce wrote:
Hans Hagen wxs.nl> writes:
On 2-6-2011 12:53, Piotr Kopszak wrote:
Many thanks for your reply! I would certainly go this way having a
couple of months or a year perspective. Besides I'm eager to try
finally the new way mkIV deals with xml. But realistically, p
Hans Hagen wxs.nl> writes:
>
> On 2-6-2011 12:53, Piotr Kopszak wrote:
> > Many thanks for your reply! I would certainly go this way having a
> > couple of months or a year perspective. Besides I'm eager to try
> > finally the new way mkIV deals with xml. But realistically, preparing
> > and tes
On 2-6-2011 12:53, Piotr Kopszak wrote:
Many thanks for your reply! I would certainly go this way having a
couple of months or a year perspective. Besides I'm eager to try
finally the new way mkIV deals with xml. But realistically, preparing
and testing a mapping of even a subset of DocBook is a
On 2-6-2011 11:39, Piotr Kopszak wrote:
Dear list,
I am beginning a rather tedious documentation project and will most
probably end up with DocBook. The fact is I haven't used it for any
serious work for about 10 years. Docbook In ConText haven't been
updated since 2003. Does it me
Many thanks for your reply! I would certainly go this way having a
couple of months or a year perspective. Besides I'm eager to try
finally the new way mkIV deals with xml. But realistically, preparing
and testing a mapping of even a subset of DocBook is a question of at
least a couple of personmo
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:39:46 +0200
Piotr Kopszak wrote:
Dear list,
I am beginning a rather tedious documentation project
and will most
probably end up with DocBook. The fact is I haven't
used it for any
serious work for about 10 years. Docbook In ConText
haven't been
updated since 2003
Dear list,
I am beginning a rather tedious documentation project and will most
probably end up with DocBook. The fact is I haven't used it for any
serious work for about 10 years. Docbook In ConText haven't been
updated since 2003. Does it mean it's so perfect or instead rather
obsole
> > I have been looking at the xml manuals of Pragma. I don't quite
> > understand what you mean with the standard chain.
>
> Hans has a This Way on using xsltproc to generate ConTeXt code, which
> you can then process using context.
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/magazines/mag-0008.pdf
http://
Quoting "R. Ermers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thank you very much indeed, Luigi.
>
> I have been looking at the xml manuals of Pragma. I don't quite
> understand what you mean with the standard chain.
Hans has a This Way on using xsltproc to generate ConTeXt code, which
you can then process using c
Thank you very much indeed, Luigi.
I have been looking at the xml manuals of Pragma. I don't quite
understand what you mean with the standard chain.
I have been experimenting before with docbook -> fo, and fop, and I came
across valuable programs like Docman and Gemdoc. But I still prefer the
On 6/7/07, R. Ermers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Has anybody found time to dive into the docbook-Context problem?
>
> The problem is that all section headings dissappear when in a given
> docbook section a table is placed. (Of course the document is validated
> against the dtd.)
it's
Dear All,
Has anybody found time to dive into the docbook-Context problem?
The problem is that all section headings dissappear when in a given
docbook section a table is placed. (Of course the document is validated
against the dtd.)
I am really puzzled by it, and it prevents me from using Cont
On 6/4/07, R. Ermers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> After having had a great deal of problems when submitting my context
> files to my publisher,
What kind of problems ?
--
luigi
If your question is of interest to other
Dear All,
After having had a great deal of problems when submitting my context
files to my publisher, I decided to write future projects in docbook
(V4.4), rather than switching to Word or Open Office. From the docbook
files I then can generate an rtf or wml file which is much more of use
for
22 matches
Mail list logo
