On Jun 26, 2014, at 5:24 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 6/26/2014 10:48 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/26/2014 5:06 AM, Brian Landy wrote:
On Jun 25, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 6/25/2014 11:26 PM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
When you say next beta do you mean a
On 6/27/2014 8:04 PM, Brian Landy wrote:
On Jun 26, 2014, at 5:24 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 6/26/2014 10:48 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/26/2014 5:06 AM, Brian Landy wrote:
On Jun 25, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 6/25/2014 11:26 PM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
On 6/26/2014 5:06 AM, Brian Landy wrote:
On Jun 25, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 6/25/2014 11:26 PM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
When you say next beta do you mean a subsequent minimals release
(i.e., this fix should be the 2014.06.22 release)? Or do you mean a new
beta
On 6/26/2014 10:48 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/26/2014 5:06 AM, Brian Landy wrote:
On Jun 25, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 6/25/2014 11:26 PM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
When you say next beta do you mean a subsequent minimals release
(i.e., this fix should be the
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Hans Hagen wrote:
anyhow, i made it work a bit better with tables (extra pass needed)
\starttext
\enabletrackers[typesetters.characteralign]
\bgroup
\setupTABLE[column][1][aligncharacter=yes,alignmentcharacter={,}]
\bTABLE
\bTR \bTD 1,2 \eTD \bTD 1,2 \eTD \bTD
On 6/25/2014 11:26 PM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Hans Hagen wrote:
anyhow, i made it work a bit better with tables (extra pass needed)
\starttext
\enabletrackers[typesetters.characteralign]
\bgroup
\setupTABLE[column][1][aligncharacter=yes,alignmentcharacter={,}]
\bTABLE
On Jun 25, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 6/25/2014 11:26 PM, Brian R. Landy wrote:
When you say next beta do you mean a subsequent minimals release
(i.e., this fix should be the 2014.06.22 release)? Or do you mean a new
beta that you announce more formally on the
On 6/17/2014 5:49 AM, Brian Landy wrote:
Almost all of the tables I generate via code, not by hand, so I found it more
convenient to include a trailing % because I occasionally did run across an
instance where it mattered, and wasn't (and am not) sufficiently skilled at
TeX/ConTeXt to know
On 6/16/2014 11:51 PM, Brian Landy wrote:
Hi, I was testing the latest beta (2014.06.15) and noticed I am getting incorrect output
using natural tables with alignment characters. I produced a small example that
demonstrates the problem, and attached output created with the version I'm testing
Hi, I was testing the latest beta (2014.06.15) and noticed I am getting
incorrect output using natural tables with alignment characters. I produced a
small example that demonstrates the problem, and attached output created with
the version I'm testing (bad.pdf) and my prior version (good.pdf,
On 6/16/2014 11:51 PM, Brian Landy wrote:
Hi, I was testing the latest beta (2014.06.15) and noticed I am getting incorrect output
using natural tables with alignment characters. I produced a small example that
demonstrates the problem, and attached output created with the version I'm testing
so instead of
\bTD[]{Bond}\eTD%
use this:
\bTD Bond \eTD
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087
Almost all of the tables I generate via code, not by hand, so I found it more
convenient to include a trailing % because I occasionally did run across an
instance where it mattered, and wasn't (and am not) sufficiently skilled at
TeX/ConTeXt to know how to predict those occurrences.
It's
13 matches
Mail list logo
