Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
do you want to show us your new year's card for 2008.
Here we go ...
http://www.pragma-ade.com/show-gra.pdf#page=11 (comment)
http://www.pragma-ade.com/show-gra.pdf#page=25 (card)
The reason for not posting the card ealier is that it uses New Euler, a
reshaped design
The reason for not posting the card ealier is that it uses New
Euler, a
reshaped design of Euler by Hermann Zapf. The official release date
was
10/1/2008, Don Knuths 70th birthday, to who this font is dedicated.
The
font itself cellebrates its 25th birthday.
Is New Euler a commercial
Hi,
I assume today's upload has made that 'current'. I wrote
a page at http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Context_2008.01.11
but no summary on the main page; because I do not trust that
I have not missed something important (like the unicode math).
Can someone (Hans) please check that page and write
Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
Is New Euler a commercial font? I tried to find anything related to
the release on the web but to no avail :-(
no surprise since it was released yesterday evening; mojca put a copy at
the garden:
http://dl.contextgarden.net/euler/distro-euler-3.0.zip
it will
Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Is there another solution other than fontforge ?
Sure, just rename the font to Unicode.ttf. And the problem should be
fixed now, so try the next beta with the original name as well.
I mean using by using characters.data in char-def.lua:
[0x25C9] = {
Is there another solution other than fontforge ?
Sure, just rename the font to Unicode.ttf. And the problem should be
fixed now, so try the next beta with the original name as well.
I mean using by using characters.data in char-def.lua:
[0x25C9] = { unicodeslot=0x25C9, category='so',
On Jan 11, 2008, at 3:35 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi,
I assume today's upload has made that 'current'. I wrote
a page at http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Context_2008.01.11
but no summary on the main page; because I do not trust that
I have not missed something important (like the unicode
On Jan 11, 2008 4:22 PM, Arthur Reutenauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there another solution other than fontforge ?
Sure, just rename the font to Unicode.ttf. And the problem should be
fixed now, so try the next beta with the original name as well.
If you mean simple rename to
Le 11 janvier à 16:10:58 Thomas A. Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit
notamment:
| Which French king is supposed to have said enrichissez-vous, was
| that Louis-Philippe? ;-)
François Guizot, Louis-Philippe's prime minister (in the 1840's)
cheers,
--
Jean
Hi,
I'm trying to install Type 1 fonts into ConTeXt, I'm using texfont, and all
but one font properly generate:
Good:
\starttyping
\definefontsynonym[Humanist777BT-BoldB][texnansi-hum777b][encoding=texnansi]
\definefontsynonym[Humanist777BT-BoldItalicB][texnansi-hum777bi][encoding=texnansi]
Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
Does anybody have a clue why the first define went sour? Which tool is used
to extract the metadata from the .pfb files?
Looks like a typing error in the pfb rename of 0018a___.pfb: it should
be named zhum601bi.pfb (note the 'm').
Best wishes,
Taco
luigi scarso wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 4:29 PM, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Is there another solution other than fontforge ?
Sure, just rename the font to Unicode.ttf. And the problem should be
fixed now, so try the next beta with the original name as well.
If you mean simple rename to Unicode.ttf, copy into appropriate dir,
luatools --generate, well ,
this did not work last night.
This can be caused by a number of things:
1. The original font file name was still stored in the cache.
2. You kept Unicode.otf along with Unicode.ttf, and
On Jan 11, 2008 4:29 PM, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Is there another solution other than fontforge ?
Sure, just rename the font to Unicode.ttf. And the problem should be
fixed now, so try the next beta with the original name as well.
I mean using
On Jan 11, 2008 8:25 PM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
Does anybody have a clue why the first define went sour? Which tool is
used
to extract the metadata from the .pfb files?
Looks like a typing error in the pfb rename of 0018a___.pfb: it should
be
(Am I wrong if I said that 'BOX DRAWINGS UP LIGHT AND LEFT HEAVY' is
normative ?)
No, you're right, Unicode names are absolutely normative. So
normative, actually, that Unicode and ISO guarantee that they will never
change, ever (they're among the very few so-called stable properties).
But,
wel, we can make a characters.context.descriptions but i'm not sure if
it will really be used, because when one knows this rather verbose
string (has looked it up), one could as well use the (also found)
unicode directly
That's what I thought at first, but then I realized it could be
Hi Pascal,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:38:00 -0700, Pascal de Bruijn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 8:25 PM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
Does anybody have a clue why the first define went sour? Which tool is
used
to extract the metadata from
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008, at 3:35 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi,
I assume today's upload has made that 'current'. I wrote
a page at http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Context_2008.01.11
but no summary on the main page; because I do not trust that
I have not missed something
On Jan 11, 2008 9:17 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pascal,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:38:00 -0700, Pascal de Bruijn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 8:25 PM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pascal de Bruijn wrote:
Does anybody have a clue why the
On Jan 11, 2008 7:15 PM, Arthur Reutenauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you mean simple rename to Unicode.ttf, copy into appropriate dir,
luatools --generate, well ,
this did not work last night.
This can be caused by a number of things:
1. The original font file name was still stored
Works as expected now
That's great news, but now that's because Hans has fixed the old
behaviour in today's (yesterday's) release ;-)
Arthur
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please
22 matches
Mail list logo
