Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 21:28, Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote:
Hallo,
I just installed the minimals and got the following error
-
texmfstart texexec --autopdf --pdf antrag.tex
TeXExec | processing document 'antrag.tex'
TeXExec
Sorry, I must have been drunk while fixing the file. In
texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf:
TEXFORMATS= .;$TEXMFOS/web2c/{$engine,}
I accidentally fixed TEXMFCNF instead of TEXFORMATS. Hopefully formats
won't fly to luatex/pdftex again. I'll fix.
IIRC, I was sitting next to you when you did
Sorry, I must have been drunk while fixing the file. In
texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf:
TEXFORMATS= .;$TEXMFOS/web2c/{$engine,}
I accidentally fixed TEXMFCNF instead of TEXFORMATS. Hopefully formats
won't fly to luatex/pdftex again. I'll fix.
IIRC, I was sitting next to you when you did
Salut tout le monde,
I wrote
[...]
texte texte
\startMPgraphic
draw (0.0cm, 0.0cm) -- (1.1cm, 1.1cm) ;
\stopMPgraphic
[...]
-
The compilation works ; I get an EPS-file with suffixe mpgraph.2 (visible with
gv)
but there is nothing in the PDF.
I
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
IIRC, I was sitting next to you when you did that, so I must have been
drunk as well
sitting there too i can confirm that neither of you were drunk so it
must have been those huge and numerous bachotek mosquito's hitting keys
randomly
Hans
Hans Hagen wrote:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
IIRC, I was sitting next to you when you did that, so I must have been
drunk as well
sitting there too i can confirm that neither of you were drunk so it
must have been those huge and numerous bachotek mosquito's hitting keys
randomly
Actually, the
Actually, the poisoning that results from the numerous mosquito bites
can probably explain everything that happens at bachotex !
But whatever happens at BachoTeX should stay at BachoTeX ;-)
Arthur
___
If
Hmmm,
While you guys are having great fun fighting mosquitos (sic),
the minimals are still broken:
- mkii won't work
- mkiv sectioning is completely broken!
??
Alan
___
If your question is of interest to others as
Am 2009-05-05 um 01:07 schrieb Kevin D. Robbins:
I asked this one last week. Wolfgang provided the (one?) answer:
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20090424.173741.4c33e4d3.en.html
Thank you!
Sorry, I forgot to search the ML first.
\select works; good to learn about that mechanism (I
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 13:20, R. Bastian wrote:
It works with
\startuseMPgraphic{fig1}
draw (0.0cm, 0.0cm) -- (1.1cm, 1.1cm) ;
\stopuseMPgraphic
\useMPgraphic{fig1}
Is the excursion deprecated ?
I don't know the details. In case of anonymous graphics I usually
use \startMPcode
On Tue, 5 May 2009 13:57:52 +0200
Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com scribit:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 13:20, R. Bastian wrote:
It works with
\startuseMPgraphic{fig1}
draw (0.0cm, 0.0cm) -- (1.1cm, 1.1cm) ;
\stopuseMPgraphic
\useMPgraphic{fig1}
Is the excursion
Zhichu Chen wrote:
Hi all,
I want to draw some paths that won't intersect with each other
in metapost. Those paths are generated randomly, e.g., draw
100 circles without any intersections. I use a very stupid
way like:
I am probably missing something, because the fastest way to
draw 100
Hi Taco,
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
Zhichu Chen wrote:
Hi all,
I want to draw some paths that won't intersect with each other
in metapost. Those paths are generated randomly, e.g., draw
100 circles without any intersections. I use a very stupid
Zhichu Chen wrote:
What I want exactly is how to determine if there's anything on
some region of the picture. I need this to test if the random
point I picked is useful.
That is easy to answer: you can't (well, not unless you invest a *lot*
of effort into creating a bitmap edge structure).
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
Zhichu Chen wrote:
What I want exactly is how to determine if there's anything on
some region of the picture. I need this to test if the random
point I picked is useful.
That is easy to answer: you can't (well, not
Zhichu Chen wrote:
Seems that I don't have too many choices. Maybe using lua to do the
math and throwing the result to metapost is faster? I think I can do
this, but I don't know how. The documents are a little limited.
For circles, probably lua calculations will be faster because the
data
Hi @all,
at the moment I'm writing a tech manual with a lt of screenshots
plots.
I've played around to find the perfect layout for my document but I'm not
fully
satisfied with what I have till now.
8---schnipp-
\setuppapersize[A4][A4]
\setuplayout [topspace=25mm,
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Zhichu Chen wrote:
Seems that I don't have too many choices. Maybe using lua to do the
math and throwing the result to metapost is faster? I think I can do
this, but I don't know how. The documents are a little limited.
For circles, probably lua calculations will be
Hi,
I'm looking for nice and short ways to remove spaces from strings
with font names. I found the \unspacestring command in the core to
do what I want but prefer a alternative solution or a few tips for
the following code.
\starttext
\bgroup
\catcode`\ =9
\definedfont[name:TeX Gyre Pagella
Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Zhichu Chen wrote:
Seems that I don't have too many choices. Maybe using lua to do the
math and throwing the result to metapost is faster? I think I can do
this, but I don't know how. The documents are a little limited.
For circles, probably lua
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Zhichu Chen wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Taco Hoekwater t...@elvenkind.com wrote:
Zhichu Chen wrote:
What I want exactly is how to determine if there's anything on
some region of the picture. I need this to test if the random
point I picked is useful.
That is
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Peter Rolf wrote:
Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Zhichu Chen wrote:
Seems that I don't have too many choices. Maybe using lua to do the
math and throwing the result to metapost is faster? I think I can do
this, but I don't know how. The documents are a
Thank you all guys,
To Aditya: Clearly I over-emphasized the randomness. Actually, what I
meant is a little more complex: identical objects on random
coordinates and they don't intersect with each other. We can rotate
them but we can't re-size them and scale them. Your code is very
interesting.
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Zhichu Chen wrote:
To Aditya: Clearly I over-emphasized the randomness. Actually, what I
meant is a little more complex: identical objects on random
coordinates and they don't intersect with each other. We can rotate
them but we can't re-size them and scale them.
The
On Tue, 5 May 2009, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Both Taco's and my solutions can be adapted so that you do not randomize the
radius. (Taco's solution will also work for arbitrary object that can then be
rotated by a random amount).
Here is another idea. Ask metapost to test for intersection, but
25 matches
Mail list logo