Hi,
I was using context and I had to wait for 16 seconds for one run
approximately. I switched to texinfo and it barely takes 2 seconds.
Can you please explain the diffrence? I know context is complex but still?
--
Best regards,
Shiv Shankar Dayal
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Shiv Shankar Dayal
shivshankar.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was using context and I had to wait for 16 seconds for one run
approximately. I switched to texinfo and it barely takes 2 seconds.
Can you please explain the diffrence? I know context is complex but
Hi,
Shiv Shankar Dayal wrote:
Hi,
I was using context and I had to wait for 16 seconds for one run
approximately. I switched to texinfo and it barely takes 2 seconds.
A whole 2 seconds? That's ridiculously slow! I just tried to print a
document with 'cat | lpr' and it took much less than
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 02:54:40 -0400
Shiv Shankar Dayal shivshankar.da...@gmail.com scribit:
Hi,
I was using context and I had to wait for 16 seconds for one run
approximately. I switched to texinfo and it barely takes 2 seconds.
Can you please explain the diffrence? I know context is
This is totally off-topic:
but given the fairly strong Dutch implication
in creating ConTeXt, it may not be surprising
that traffic on the mailing list has slowed-down
recently.
Not to ruffle the feathers of everyone else
on the mailing list, either...
Alan
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Shiv Shankar Dayal
shivshankar.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was using context and I had to wait for 16 seconds for one run
approximately. I switched to texinfo and it barely takes 2 seconds.
Can you please explain the diffrence? I know context is complex but
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 02:03, Tom t...@tuxedo-press.com wrote:
What would be the best version of ConTeXt to recommend to a friend who
writes novels on a PC running Windows? The person has no programming skills.
He would probably require some assistance installing Tex-Live or whatever
and would
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Vnpenguin vnpeng...@vnoss.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 02:03, Tom t...@tuxedo-press.com wrote:
What would be the best version of ConTeXt to recommend to a friend who
writes novels on a PC running Windows? The person has no programming skills.
He would
This is totally off-topic:
Well, this is OK, it does not harm to mix Apple and Oranjes from time
to time ;-)
Arthur
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
On 8-7-2010 9:49, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
This is totally off-topic:
but given the fairly strong Dutch implication
in creating ConTeXt, it may not be surprising
that traffic on the mailing list has slowed-down
recently.
Not to ruffle the feathers of everyone else
on the mailing list, either...
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 02:03, Tom wrote:
What would be the best version of ConTeXt to recommend to a friend who
writes novels on a PC running Windows? The person has no programming skills.
He would probably require some assistance installing Tex-Live or whatever
and would need a stable version
-Original Message-
From: ntg-context-boun...@ntg.nl [mailto:ntg-context-boun...@ntg.nl] On
Behalf Of Mojca Miklavec
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:14 AM
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Best version of ConTeXt
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 02:03, Tom wrote:
On Thursday 08 July 2010 10:33:08 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8-7-2010 9:49, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
This is totally off-topic:
but given the fairly strong Dutch implication
in creating ConTeXt, it may not be surprising
that traffic on the mailing list has slowed-down
recently.
Not to ruffle
On Thursday 08 July 2010 13:54:57 Tom wrote:
I don't expect there will be much ConTeXt activity from our Dutch friends
today due to the big game, but I will risk a question anyway.
The BIG game will be on Sunday.
From which site should Americans download Tex Live 2010? Minimals only?
On 8-7-2010 2:16, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Thursday 08 July 2010 10:33:08 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8-7-2010 9:49, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
This is totally off-topic:
but given the fairly strong Dutch implication
in creating ConTeXt, it may not be surprising
that traffic on the mailing list has
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 13:54, Tom wrote:
From which site should Americans download Tex Live 2010? Minimals only?
http://www.tug.org/texlive/pretest.html
http://www.tug.org/texlive/mirmon/
I assume that the beta version is the latest 2010
version, bugs and all, and that the stable version is
2010/7/8 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com:
Yes, Taco only said that DVDs will be sent to members in September.
Images will be available in August.
Best
Martin
___
If your question is of interest to
Hi all,
I'm having a but of a problem using writetolist. In principle, I want to
insert something into the table of contents, but I don't want to disturb
the flow of the text. Unfortunately, the following code seems to
generate a blank at the top of the page:
\showframe
\showmakeup
-Original Message-
From: ntg-context-boun...@ntg.nl [mailto:ntg-context-boun...@ntg.nl] On
Behalf Of Mojca Miklavec
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 9:21 AM
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Best version of ConTeXt
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 13:54, Tom wrote:
From
On 8-7-2010 7:33, Michael Murphy wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having a but of a problem using writetolist. In principle, I want to
insert something into the table of contents, but I don't want to disturb
the flow of the text. Unfortunately, the following code seems to
generate a blank at the top of the
I'm having a but of a problem using writetolist. In principle, I want to
insert something into the table of contents, but I don't want to disturb
the flow of the text. Unfortunately, the following code seems to
generate a blank at the top of the page:
mkii or mkiv or both?
It looks like it
Am 2010-07-08 um 20:54 schrieb Tom:
I get very confused by all the different versions.
You asked for the best version, so we supposed you'd know several.
For starters, what is Tex
Live? Is it the full blown Context or is it something else? The TUG
site has
Tex Live 2009 which I assume is a
-Original Message-
From: ntg-context-boun...@ntg.nl [mailto:ntg-context-boun...@ntg.nl] On
Behalf Of Henning Hraban Ramm
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 5:11 PM
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Best version of ConTeXt
Am 2010-07-08 um 20:54 schrieb Tom:
I get
On 2010-07-08, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Context Minimals is context-only TeX distribution. If you don't need
LaTeX, you can use minimals, else install TeXLive 2010 (context Mark IV is
broken in TeXLive 2009).
But it is true that minimals sometimes break. TL won't change for at
least a year
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to do some horizontal alignment, for typesetting poetry.
There are lines that are continuations of the previous line, and should
be aligned to the end of that previous line. Currently, I'm doing this
by using \phantom text, which for some reason I also have to wrap into
an
25 matches
Mail list logo
