Re: [NTG-context] adjustment to my local footnotes problem
I tried all those Hraban, unsuccessfully, but finally 'happened' upon a
solution by trying whitespace instead in the setups. Except that I had
read somewhere in the mailing list (Pablo I think) that I would need to
use \directsetup. I don't actually understand why, have never been sure
about what \directsetup does, but there's no doubt it works in this
case! So the following has done what I needed:
\startsetups[setups:footnotes]
\setupwhitespace[.01em]
\stopsetups
\setupnote[before=\directsetup{setups:footnotes}]
Julian
On 23/4/23 20:34, Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context wrote:
Am 23.04.23 um 09:21 schrieb jbf via ntg-context:
I realise that I should have been talking about the space between
local footnotes, rather than interlinespace (previous email on this
issue), but my basic problem still stands. My efforts to influence
the space between footnotes placed locally is to no avail so far.
I assume it is \setupnote (rather than \setupnotation, my earlier
mistake) where I would need to somehow influence distance between
footnotes which is currently too large. I have tried
\setupnote[before={\blank[small]}, after={\blank[small]}]. It appears
to be reducing the space before the entire block of local footnotes
but not between the footnotes themselves, which is what I am trying
to do.
Did you try "inbetween" or "distance"? (I’d assume the latter is for
the distance between number and text, but inbetween is usually
vertically.)
https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/setupnote
Am I correct in assuming that the \setupnote should influence my
\placelocalfootnotes? Or is there something else I should do in the
case of local footnotes as distinct from general footnotes (my
document contains ONLY local footnotes, however).
I was wondering if \setupnote[localfootnote][…] makes sense, but I
can’t find in the sources if local footnotes are setup differently
from general one.
Hraban
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] adjustment to my local footnotes problem
I tried all those Hraban, unsuccessfully, but finally 'happened' upon a
solution by trying whitespace instead in the setups. Except that I had
read somewhere in the mailing list (Pablo I think) that I would need to
use \directsetup. I don't actually understand why, have never been sure
about what \directsetup does, but there's no doubt it works in this
case! So the following has done what I needed:
\startsetups[setups:footnotes]
\setupwhitespace[.01em]
\stopsetups
\setupnote[before=\directsetup{setups:footnotes}]
Julian
On 23/4/23 20:34, Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context wrote:
Am 23.04.23 um 09:21 schrieb jbf via ntg-context:
I realise that I should have been talking about the space between
local footnotes, rather than interlinespace (previous email on this
issue), but my basic problem still stands. My efforts to influence
the space between footnotes placed locally is to no avail so far.
I assume it is \setupnote (rather than \setupnotation, my earlier
mistake) where I would need to somehow influence distance between
footnotes which is currently too large. I have tried
\setupnote[before={\blank[small]}, after={\blank[small]}]. It appears
to be reducing the space before the entire block of local footnotes
but not between the footnotes themselves, which is what I am trying
to do.
Did you try "inbetween" or "distance"? (I’d assume the latter is for
the distance between number and text, but inbetween is usually
vertically.)
https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/setupnote
Am I correct in assuming that the \setupnote should influence my
\placelocalfootnotes? Or is there something else I should do in the
case of local footnotes as distinct from general footnotes (my
document contains ONLY local footnotes, however).
I was wondering if \setupnote[localfootnote][…] makes sense, but I
can’t find in the sources if local footnotes are setup differently
from general one.
Hraban
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] adjustment to my local footnotes problem
Am 23.04.23 um 09:21 schrieb jbf via ntg-context:
I realise that I should have been talking about the space between local
footnotes, rather than interlinespace (previous email on this issue),
but my basic problem still stands. My efforts to influence the space
between footnotes placed locally is to no avail so far.
I assume it is \setupnote (rather than \setupnotation, my earlier
mistake) where I would need to somehow influence distance between
footnotes which is currently too large. I have tried
\setupnote[before={\blank[small]}, after={\blank[small]}]. It appears to
be reducing the space before the entire block of local footnotes but not
between the footnotes themselves, which is what I am trying to do.
Did you try "inbetween" or "distance"? (I’d assume the latter is for the
distance between number and text, but inbetween is usually vertically.)
https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/setupnote
Am I correct in assuming that the \setupnote should influence my
\placelocalfootnotes? Or is there something else I should do in the case
of local footnotes as distinct from general footnotes (my document
contains ONLY local footnotes, however).
I was wondering if \setupnote[localfootnote][…] makes sense, but I can’t
find in the sources if local footnotes are setup differently from
general one.
Hraban
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] current Unicode blocks
Am 22.04.23 um 21:34 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context:
On 4/22/2023 5:49 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context wrote:
This is probably for Hans:
The list of Unicode blocks in char-ini.lua is not complete, compared
with ftp://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/Blocks.txt
(I was looking for Kaktovik numerals, of course ;))
hm, here i have
["kaktoviknumerals"] = { first =
0x1D2C0, last = 0x1D2DF, description = "Kaktovik Numerals" },
Oh, sorry, I was just looking at the source browser. Garden isn’t current.
I’d offer to make an updated list, but maybe you already have a script
for that?
yes, (of course) i have a script that i run when there is an update
which then tells me what to add to the tables (not that much work,
mostly emoiji and soem rare scripts nowadays)
Thought so.
maybe nice for a demo at the ctx meeting (generate new files, visually
diff them so get the picture and then merge)
Sure!
Hraban
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] adjustment to my local footnotes problem
I realise that I should have been talking about the space between local
footnotes, rather than interlinespace (previous email on this issue),
but my basic problem still stands. My efforts to influence the space
between footnotes placed locally is to no avail so far.
I assume it is \setupnote (rather than \setupnotation, my earlier
mistake) where I would need to somehow influence distance between
footnotes which is currently too large. I have tried
\setupnote[before={\blank[small]}, after={\blank[small]}]. It appears to
be reducing the space before the entire block of local footnotes but not
between the footnotes themselves, which is what I am trying to do.
Am I correct in assuming that the \setupnote should influence my
\placelocalfootnotes? Or is there something else I should do in the case
of local footnotes as distinct from general footnotes (my document
contains ONLY local footnotes, however).
It seems a simple enough issue, but I just can't get it right.
Julian
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : https://contextgarden.net
___
