On 23 Dec 2008, at 04:26, Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, all.
I expect different output in xetex and luatex using context. and I
think the problem is quite serious although I do not speak Turkish.
in turkish, fi can not be treat as ligatures and I can see luatex
handle that quite well. however, in xetex,
On 17 Apr 2008, at 7:23 am, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Do, 17 Apr 2008, Will Robertson wrote:
>> Sorry, I didn't know how you went about actually creating this
>> package.
>
> The packages are created from the actual TeX Live release, or better
> from the security branch of the subversion repo
On 17 Apr 2008, at 1:09 am, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
>> On 16 Apr 2008, at 7:56 pm, Norbert Preining wrote:
>>
>> Given that there won't be TL2008 in lenny, I think it would be very
>> desirable to update xet
On 16 Apr 2008, at 7:56 pm, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Jonathan, Will: It is about TeX Live 2007 in Debian/lenny. There
> will be
> no TL2008 in lenny. But we have recent context and recent luatex.
>
> It is about updating the lmodern fonts, currently we have 1.01x, the
> last before the otf and
On 10 Mar 2008, at 1:50 pm, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I just wanted to let you know that XeTeX now supports both faking
>>> bold
>>> and slanted (and the binaries on the garden minimals have that
>>> fe
On 1 Feb 2007, at 1:51 pm, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
> If you have someone to blame, please blame me. I asked Hans if he
> could add an additional switch -output-driver="xdvipdfmx" when running
> XeTeX. This means that the files are now converted to pdf with
> xdvipdfmx instead of xdv2pdf. Without t
On 31 Jan 2007, at 4:58 pm, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> hm, i'm still wondering why xetex needs the extra [] ; is this
>> somewhere documented? is it something new? why not {}
>>
>> having an extra series of defs for xetex is a bad idea, so i'd
>> rather fix that 'automatically'
>
> Using OpenTyp
On 13 Jun 2006, at 8:25 am, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> On a more general level, if both ConTeXt and XeTeX are engaged in
>> converting legacy TeX hyphenation patterns to utf-8, should they be
>> coordinated in order to avoid duplication of effort?
>>
>>
> anyone can use the patterns; of course bugs need
On 1 Jun 2005, at 2:15 pm, Adam Lindsay wrote:
[I'm copying to the XeTeX list--this may not be ConTeXt-specific. -atl]
Dalyoung said this at Wed, 1 Jun 2005 22:03:37 +0900:
1) Recently, I upgraded ConTeXt new version and got a problem in
compilation. However, after upgrading texexec and creat
On 16 Dec 2004, at 4:56 pm, Adam Lindsay wrote:
Well, at the moment, it's "context":
extra_mem_bot.context = 0
(That's a pretty harsh workaround, considering "extra_mem_bot.context =
400" is the default in gwTeX.
True. But if it becomes a problem, you could increase the
main_memory.context va
10 matches
Mail list logo
