On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 07:49:07PM +0100, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Hi Hans,
sorry for telling again, but I’m afraid that the following sample shows
a serious buggy interaction between \setupdirections[bidi=on] and \about
references.
\setupdirections[bidi=on]
No problem with
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 02:40:18PM +0100, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
I do not agree with you. It is not so important to have the same syntax as
in LaTeX (exception: it would be nice to get double bars from \| since it
does not make sense to have \| yield a single bar since | does)
That is the
- Forwarded message from Frédéric WANG fred.w...@free.fr -
From: Frédéric WANG fred.w...@free.fr
To: www-m...@w3.org www-m...@w3.org, LaTeXML project
project-late...@lists.jacobs-university.de
Subject: Thank you
Dear all,
Two months ago, I started a fundraising campaign to help MathML
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 09:19:26PM +0100, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-12-01 Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 11:21:30AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Interestingly, after I patched Sorts Mill (a FontForge fork) to avoid
duplicates[1] I ended up with a ‘dotlessi.sc’ glyph
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:35:01PM +0100, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 10:20 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/27/2013 9:53 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
On 2013-11-27 Hans Hagen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 11:21:30AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
It is not clear to me how FontLab arrived to the dotlessi name from the
GSUB table, but I need to look into the font a bit more closer.
Interestingly, after I patched Sorts Mill (a FontForge fork) to avoid
duplicates[1] I ended up
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:18:47PM +0100, H. Özoguz wrote:
It is my believe that Unicode has the wrong properties for Arabic
standalone Hamza; in short you should just type a regular Hamza in the
middle of the word and it will get positioned correctly. Placing a
combining Hamza over a Tatweel
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/24/2013 6:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
shows me a little sign above the word
the only issue i see is that this otf font has 2048 units and gets scaled
wrong (in luatex's backend probably)
It is actually a TTF font but the
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:48:05PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/24/2013 6:38 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/24/2013 6:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
shows me a little sign above the word
the only issue i see is that this otf font has
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:52:31PM +0100, H. Özoguz wrote:
The extend feature stretches the glyphs to get narrow or wide font but it
doesn’t embolden it.
The best solution is to get a font with a real bold style, money shouldn’t
be a problem because fonts are cheap nowadays.
Wolfgang
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 08:49:40PM +0100, H. Özoguz wrote:
http://amirifont.org/
/ - and more hard to find such a find in this style (Uthmanic).
/
There is no such a style, it is just a simplified (dumbed down) Naskh
style used only in one single Mushaf. Why is that a requirement?
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 08:53:00PM +0100, H. Özoguz wrote:
Again, because arabic seems to be vanished in my first posting, I dont know
why.
Thanks Khaled,
the Naskh-Style is not an absolute requirement, but it is very well
known and very common (at least for muslims in germany) - and
http://www.ulule.com/mathematics-ebooks/
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 07:49:59AM +0900, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 10/25/2013 5:57 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 07:23:43AM +0900, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 10/24/2013 2:46 PM, H. Özoguz wrote:
\setupbodyfont [dejavu,12pt]
\starttext
$a/b$
$1/2$
$π/3$
\stoptext
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 07:23:43AM +0900, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 10/24/2013 2:46 PM, H. Özoguz wrote:
\setupbodyfont [dejavu,12pt]
\starttext
$a/b$
$1/2$
$π/3$
\stoptext
Is this indeed the desired spacing? What do others think?
Thanks.
I think you are right, I don't know if this
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:57:22PM -0400, john Culleton wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:30:54 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 13.10.2013 um 06:09 schrieb Ciro A. Soto c...@kavyata.com:
sorry, I just saw an old chain of messages about this question... I
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:39:32AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 10/12/2013 12:19 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
The problem is that OpenType is hard, you already know that. ConTeXt
will never be able to dedicate enough resources to catch up with
development, so it makes much sense to reuse
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:19:16AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 10/12/2013 2:15 AM, Philipp Gesang wrote:
···date: 2013-10-12, Saturday···from: Hans Hagen···
On 10/12/2013 12:48 AM, Thangalin wrote:
Hi
(Copperplate is going to be added soon.) Unfortunately, Context
Keep in mind it was
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:05:03PM -0700, Thangalin wrote:
In that case I'd run a separate font checker, as you never know what users
upload. Similar issues can occur with those tagged formats that are in fact
linked lists.
That's a good idea. The TTX font tool was going to be my first
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 11:18:47AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 10/12/2013 9:27 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:19:16AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 10/12/2013 2:15 AM, Philipp Gesang wrote:
···date: 2013-10-12, Saturday···from: Hans Hagen···
On 10/12/2013 12:48 AM
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 11:20:52AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 10/1/2013 10:05 AM, Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–09–30 Hans Hagen wrote:
these are unrelated mechanisms where the first one just does some
pdf magic ... no feedback to tex about widths (ok, i could write
something better but
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:50:31AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Concerning the conference: there are tutorials and qa sessions, so
if anyone attending has specific questions of wishes, let them know
and they might serve as templates. Of course it has to be
reasonable, not 'i want a three
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
anyway, it would be nice to see where the three methods fail:
Of the three, method one seems to give correct results on all the given
tests (I’m yet to test with my own documents).
I’m skeptical that bidi can be implemented in a one
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 08:01:30PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi,
I uploaded a beta with additional bidi code. There are now three methods:
default : the original one, the fastest, wil be improved a bit
one : unicode bidi, derived from khaleds t-bidi, cleaned up and
optimized plus some
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 09:57:59AM -0700, Thangalin wrote:
Hi,
div class=section ...
div class=... ...
div
/div
i.e. only divs and spans
I think that would be a more robust output format, technically, easier to
adapt, and more readily conform to the strict XHTML
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 02:00:16PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
great ... another non standard use of names
There are no standard glyph names for TrueType/OpenType fonts. AGL is
completely optional, and is not part of any standard. Fonts can, and do,
use names that does not follow AGL (or no names
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 09:05:18AM +0200, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
Hi,
Have you tries U+1024 or LETTER CAPITAL H WITH CIRCUMFLEX?
True not all Fonts might not have it and it is TEXT not Math.
And you shouldn’t use it in math, even Unicode discourages such use.
Accents in text and math are
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:28:12AM +0200, Rudolf Bahr wrote:
both with context and texexec, but I don't achieve the desired result.
texexec displays a font somehow similar to Fraktur, but not a very nice one
and
much to broad; and it seems to have no different s (one inner-word and one
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 04:08:40PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
two details that keep missing is max and lim (see below).
mi mathvariant=normallim/mi
I do not know MATHML, but this seems like a wrong way to input \lim.
The above is roughly
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:12:01PM +0200, Sander Maijers wrote:
Is this what you need Steffen:
http://zvon.org/xxl/MathML/Output/el_limit.html
That is content not presentation MathML, they are quite different.
Regards,
Khaled
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 01:52:22PM +0200, H. Özoguz wrote:
Hi there,
I cant run the font ramnaclq-webfont.ttf (see attachment) in Context.
That is a broken, a so called “ASCII hack” font that (ab)uses ASCII code
points for Arabic. In short it is a broken font and will not work.
Regards,
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:01:30AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 5/20/2013 11:36 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:22:41PM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
My suggestion is to just use \phys_units_text_* always, since the
decomposed, two characters is the preferred form for those
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:57:16PM +0200, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Mon, 20 May 2013 22:29:22 +0200
Romain Diss romain.d...@yahoo.fr wrote:
The °C symbol is missing in math mode with the dejavu font. I thought
that this should be handled by using the '°' + 'C' symbols instead
but it is not
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:13:16PM +0200, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 20.05.2013 um 23:04 schrieb Romain Diss romain.d...@yahoo.fr:
Le lundi 20 mai 2013, Alan BRASLAU a écrit :
On Mon, 20 May 2013 22:29:22 +0200
Romain Diss romain.d...@yahoo.fr wrote:
The °C symbol is missing in math
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:22:41PM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
My suggestion is to just use \phys_units_text_* always, since the
decomposed, two characters is the preferred form for those two units.
“In normal use, it is better to represent degrees Celsius ‘°C’ with a
sequence of U+00B0 DEGREE
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 08:51:28AM -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
wrote:
Hi Georg,
On Wed, 15 May 2013 00:09:22 -0600, Georg Duffner
g.duff...@gmail.com wrote:
I’d prefer to stay with the AFF syntax which is well established.
I wonder if the latest, virtually frozen
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 03:22:27PM -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
wrote:
Salaam, Huseyin,
I missed this and other threads, it's been busy here...
On Tue, 07 May 2013 23:35:25 -0600, H. Özoguz h.oezo...@mmnetz.de wrote:
But with traditionalarabic it is worse than with
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 11:03:28PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 5/8/2013 10:58 PM, H. Özoguz wrote:
seems like an issue with liga ... i'm not sure if that's a context
problem
Hmm, see in the attachment the output of MS-Word, with activated
ligatures. So it has to do anything with ConText, or
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 05:38:35PM +0200, H. Özoguz wrote:
Hoping to annoy not everybody here with my arabic-font-questions.
I have found I nice free arabic ttf-font, you can download it here:
http://fonts.qurancomplex.gov.sa/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/UthmanTN1-Ver10.zip.
One of its
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 01:28:20PM +0100, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
thinking of it: one reason why a general purpose word processor used
by people with no idea about things like ligatures, is that
ligatures are language dependent
I don't think that's necessary relevant: the only example
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 12:56:25PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/28/2013 12:04 PM, Philipp Gesang wrote:
the font cache currently drops non-ascii bytes when creating file
names by means of containers.cleanname(). Dohyun Kim sent a fix
for data-con.lua (see below). My own test with the
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 09:41:15AM +0200, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
On the other side, I believe, ligatures of off by default in LaTeX, et
al. or at least are feature
is set when the font is loaded.
So you neither use LaTeX nor ConTeXt?
Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 09:41:15AM +0200, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
On the other side, I believe, ligatures of off by default in LaTeX, et
al. or at least are feature
is set when the font is loaded.
So you neither use LaTeX nor ConTeXt
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:16:42AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/26/2013 11:48 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I consider this (the fact that one doesn't notice it) part of a good
design. It's similar with kerning: one doesn't notice it until/unless
it's bad. It's similar in the kitchen also. One
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:12:48AM -0500, Troy Henderson wrote:
Did we change something with the type 1? In mkiv ... we probably never
finished the mappings ... waste of time now that we have otf.
This makes me believe that I will eventually HAVE to purchase (and by
purchase I really
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:39:25PM +0200, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 21:25:16 +0200
Xenia yor...@googlemail.com wrote:
Oh, I didn't know that. For my feelings, all variables should have the
same size here (a,b and c).
In this case you should probably use:
a = \sqrt{b/c}
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:55:40AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/5/2013 12:13 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/4/2013 11:44 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Xenia wrote:
Hi context list,
I noticed that the ∓ sign is a little higher than
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 11:20:41PM -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
wrote:
Dear gang,
My apologies if the answers to the following are already well-known
and if I'm being completely clueless:
What is the standard way of representing the symbol '\TeX' in html
and the like?
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:33:52PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The \frac command uses \vcenter for the content while \dfrac and
\tfrac only set the mathstyle before placing the content with the
\over primitive.
The use of \vcenter seems odd here as it means the fraction rule will no
You can ignore everything Keith said and you will be just fine.
Regards,
Khaled
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:32:39AM +, Meigen, Thomas wrote:
Hi Keith,
thank you for your open comments. You exactly understood the questions
that I am asking right now. Would it be a good idea to switch to
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 02:10:50AM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
It looks like hbar (LATIN SMALL LETTER H WITH STROKE 0x127) is not
in the math fonts.
\hbar should be a glyph variant of \hslash (U+0210F), according to STIX
people, if the font provides such a variant.
Regards,
Khaled
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 02:50:06PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12/23/2012 7:29 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Hi all,
Some people have been complaining that it is not possible to use XeTeX
with filenames containing parenthesis because XeTeX treats it as
filename quote char and this it gets
Hi all,
Some people have been complaining that it is not possible to use XeTeX
with filenames containing parenthesis because XeTeX treats it as
filename quote char and this it gets stripped. Anyway, after some
searching it turned out this was added in 2004 for ConTeXt to workaround
some MetaPost
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 09:07:43PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/30/2012 10:26 AM, Jeong Dal wrote:
Hi,
After updating ConTeXt, math command '\not\in' is not shown properly.
For example,
$a \not\eq b$ is good.
but $a \not\in A$ shows two symbols separately.
I am using Mac OS X
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 10:58:56AM +0100, Steve White wrote:
Hi all,
I finally got something like Pablo's test working on my system. It doesn't
show much new. As had already been established, with the right ConTeXt
switches, OpenType features of kerning and ligatures work correctly with
is not hard.
It has been done in many projects.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 10:58:56AM +0100, Steve White wrote:
Hi all,
I finally got something like Pablo's test working on my system. It
doesn't
show much new
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:58:25AM +0100, Steve White wrote:
There was a suggestion that Latin kerns should be activated by
{script,lang}={dflt,dflt}. Let me ask, should Devanagari kerns also be
activated by {dflt, dflt}? If not, why?
My own policy is, unless a feature must be restricted to
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:35:36AM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi Khaled
these virtual versions are essentially the body font counterparts with
lots of display-modifying tweaks piled on to make them behave like
math fonts. These virtual versions were used for a time while the math
fonts were
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 08:10:19PM +0100, Sietse Brouwer wrote:
these virtual versions are essentially the body font counterparts with
lots of display-modifying tweaks piled on to make them behave like
math fonts. These virtual versions were used for a time while the math
fonts were in
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 02:19:13PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
2012/11/13 yang.zhao hckjs...@gmail.com:
Thank you, it works.
PLEASE switch of Comic Sans!
http://bancomicsans.com/
I like Comic Sans (I really do, no idea why it is so much hated).
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 04:58:11PM +0200, Andreas Mang wrote:
Hi there,
Not quite sure if this is the right place. I wanted to send this
directly to Khaled Hosny, but then I thought it might be good to have
some additional opinion on some of these issues (I am not quite sure
if some
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:01:35PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Khaled Hosny wrote:
None of those glyphs were changed in XITS, they are exactly the same as
the ones in STIX fonts, so possibly ConTeXt is using the wrong Unicode
character for those symbols. The later two
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 07:35:02PM +0200, Andreas Mang wrote:
Hi there,
Likewise to an issue reported earlier to this list (Math other
issues for TL 2012) there seems to be a problem with the spacing of
the superscript in the xits math font, which cannot be controlled via
the
This is stuff is usually bogus, but the choice of Computer Modern is
interesting:
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/08/hear-all-ye-people-hearken-o-earth/
(for once an OT that is not Luigi's)
___
If your
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 02:05:34PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 3-8-2012 13:31, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
and putting into the apropriate LuaTeX-datastructures(naturally, GDEF
-table would match the other OTF-LuaTeX-Table programming style).
Then patching the others functions, if necessary, to
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:50:44AM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 29-7-2012 22:36, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
For MKII the answer is no. MKIV can - to a
certain extent - read and interpret fontconfig's XML configuration
file. The real
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:16:44AM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I believe it's the other way around: applications on Mac should not
use fontconfig ;), but when they do (most of them being ported from
linux), they cannot rely on fontconfig's presence on the system.
It's more or less the same
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 06:15:31PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
LaTeX is in a sense way more stable
Which is mostly an illusion, packages do change all the time,
hyphenation patterns change, fonts change and engines change (even
pdfTeX), and unlike ConTeXt backups are much harder to take (short
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:21:22PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 24-7-2012 21:29, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
\definehighlight[smallcaps][style=\setff{smallcaps}]
Hello and thanks for your help but even if I
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:48:31PM -0400, Matthias Weber wrote:
It was never a problem in TeX to modify the control characters used
according to your own pleasure.
Except that is not the kind of thing ConTeXt users are supposed to mess
with, I feel guilty every time I mess with catcodes in my
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:29:52AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 17-7-2012 22:36, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:40:15PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 17-7-2012 19:39, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Andreas Mang wrote:
Dear all,
The \blacktriangle
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:40:15PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 17-7-2012 19:39, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Andreas Mang wrote:
Dear all,
The \blacktriangle and \blacktriangledown symbol seem to be missing,
though \blacktriangleright and \...-left are defined. Is there a
The use of (which is a common symbol) as a control character is a long
standing idiosyncrasy of TeX that I'm glad ConTeXt has got rid of.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 07:32:09PM -0400, Matthias Weber wrote:
Thanks - I wasn't aware that the human readable version had been deprecated :(
Matthias
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 06:34:40PM -0500, Troy Henderson wrote:
I would like to know if there is a command like \tfn{0.9} which would allow
the
user to specify an arbitrary font scale factor since the built-in \tfa, \tfb,
\
tfc, \tfd, \tfx, and \tfxx are insufficient for one of my projects.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 04:24:12PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
I'd be interested to see whether you manage to successfully use
devanagari with context. (I vaguely remember a mailing list posting that
devanagari is not supported...?)
ConTeXt MkIV does not have support for indic opentype
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:40:22AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8-6-2012 06:16, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 06:14:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
btw, what are features like cv80 and cv81 supposed to represent?
A relatively new OpenType addition.
http://www.microsoft.com
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 06:14:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
btw, what are features like cv80 and cv81 supposed to represent?
A relatively new OpenType addition.
http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/features_ae.htm#cv01-cv99
Regards,
Khaled
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 06:04:39PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi,
I couldn't resist ... firefox has a nice 3d view of a page and this
is how the context garden looks like. A nice tests for epubs.
Now, we want that in ConTeXt ;)
Regards,
Khaled
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 12:54:11PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
With TL freeze that is probably going to happen tomorrow (plus a few
days of grace period): what is the current state of problems with math
fonts, and possibly any other issues (apart from the known crash on
mipsel
Currently if the font has a MathConstants table it is considered a new
math font.
Regards,
Khaled
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 08:59:31PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Question for Khaled.
What is currently the logic in luatex? There used to be some
heuristic to determine if we have a traditional or
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:46:32AM +0200, Jan Pohanka wrote:
Also why the latex way -{}- does not work? It is a feature of luatex?
{} breaking ligatures is “an accidental feature¹” in traditional TeX
that LuaTeX got rid of.
Regards,
Khaled
¹
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:19:00PM +0300, Janne Junnila wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that the spacing after ${\cal P}$ looks a bit too tight
(non-existent?) while using XITS fonts.
\setupbodyfont[xits]
\starttext
The spacing of ${\cal P}$ looks like this.
\stoptext
I'm not sure if the
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:55:49PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Euler is also used in the magazine ... but of course it is up to
Khaled if he doesn't want to include the font. Khaled - would you at
least be ready to offer tar.xz file (one sufficient for direct
installation into TL) or put it
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:29:02PM +, Rogers, Michael K wrote:
On May 29, 2012, at 8:13 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:19:00PM +0300, Janne Junnila wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that the spacing after ${\cal P}$ looks a bit too tight
(non-existent?) while using
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 05:34:47PM +0300, Janne Junnila wrote:
Doesn't seem to be only macs, I'm on Linux using the latest beta. The
PDF I get is like the one Michael sent earlier. I tried other
calligraphic letters with the vrules, and it seems that some of them
have similar issues, just not
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:58:27AM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Tim Steenvoorden wrote:
P.S. Euler is working in the 2012.05.26 16:40 Standalone version.
The version of ConTeXt in TeX Live is almost the same as in minimals
(ok, I didn't check in the version
AFAIK, no.
The code that handles extensible delimiters changed, but IIUC
we are not talking about extensible symbol here.
Regards,
Khaled
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 01:13:10AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi Khaled,
just checking ... did the code related to display operator heights
change as
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:59:41AM -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2012, Ian Lawrence wrote:
I read on the wiki that now svg is natively supported. Hmm.
No. You need to have inkscape installed (and in your PATH) for svg
to pdf conversion to work.
FWIW, I cannot find the
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:14:39PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
but the future seems Bright ;)
We should have named the fonts Lucida Brighter and Lucida Saner etc. ;)
Regards,
Khaled
___
If your question is of
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 01:28:42PM -0700, Kip Warner wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 02:10:33PM +0900, S Barmeier wrote:
In ubuntu 12.04 all font packages are renamed to fonts-*, rather than
ttf-* or otf-* etc.
Most, but not all. ttf-ubuntu-font-family and ttf-ubuntu-title appear
to be
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 01:25:03PM +0900, S Barmeier wrote:
After updating to ubuntu 12.04, my shouts of joy were smothered by the
following
!LuaTeX error: cannot find OpenType font file for reading ()
== Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!
mtx-context | fatal error:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:09:11AM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 29-2-2012 14:57, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Hi all,
Was exploring font goodies and color schemes and so far works great,
very nice feature, thanks Hans.
Now I've to small questions/feature requests:
Can color schemes be
defined
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:49:48PM -0700, Kip Warner wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:46 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
TeX has it’s problem with certain errors, accept it.
It is not a problem with the program raising an error, it was how it
went about doing it. It should not have to take
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 08:21:35AM +0100, Patrick Gundlach wrote:
Am 20.03.2012 um 06:49 schrieb Kip Warner:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 06:46 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
TeX has it’s problem with certain errors, accept it.
It is not a problem with the program raising an error, it was
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:46:56PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Stefan Müller wrote:
Dear list,
with one of the last versions (I'm currently using ConTeXt standalone
2012003005 19:49 MkIV) \notin is not working anymore. See
\starttext $a \notin b \not\in c$
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:40:20PM +1100, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
Yes, but what ebook formats handle mathematics and diagrams?
Plus the poor layout support in almost all ebook readers (brain dead
paragraph builder, no hyphenation, no OpenType support etc. etc. they
are usually pieces of junk
]
\setupalign[r2l]
\starttext
\definedfont[name:amiri*arabic at 36pt]
\setfontcolorscheme[1]
ضَرَبَ ضُرِبَ ضَرْبًا
\setfontcolorscheme[2]
ضَرَبَ ضُرِبَ ضَرْبًا
\stoptext
return {
name = Amiri,
version = 1.00,
comment = Goodies that complement the Amiri font.,
author = Khaled Hosny
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:50:45PM +0100, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
... does anybody know what this refers to, ie. what this means?
You have broken math fonts setup.
Regards,
Khaled
___
If your question is of
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:29:30AM -0500, William Adams wrote:
Scribus isn't that much different from InDesign and Quark, so the
criticism holds:
Scribus is even worse; it lacks OpenType support, complex text layout,
right to left support, a not brain dead paragraph builder etc.
Regards,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 03:39:04PM +0100, Honza Hejzl wrote:
Hi,
does anybody know how to really embed fonts into a pdffile? I have checked and
read many conversations on that topic here but without the real solution (just
a tons of arguments about how problematic/unethic it could be… and so
1 - 100 of 573 matches
Mail list logo
