On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 19:08, wrote:
>
> Hi Duncan,
>
> I guess this may be what you want to do:
>
> \setuphead[part][placehead=yes]
> \setuphead[section][sectionsegments=section]
> \setuphead[subsection][sectionsegments=section:subsection]
> \starttext
> \part{Part}
>
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 11:00, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> in the test suite there are all kind of examples (zip can be downloaded
> from the website)
>
>
Thanks Hans. After some searching in the test suite I found the answer,
which I'll put here in case someone else is searching for it, which is:
On 6/23/19 10:26 AM, Duncan Hothersall wrote:
> Further to my previous query about updating from mkii to mkiv, I have
> solved some of the issues by trial and error but am beginning to
> identify the ones I can't resolve. My first minimal example is below.
>
> I want the sections and subsections
On 6/23/2019 10:26 AM, Duncan Hothersall wrote:
Further to my previous query about updating from mkii to mkiv, I have
solved some of the issues by trial and error but am beginning to
identify the ones I can't resolve. My first minimal example is below.
I want the sections and subsections not
Further to my previous query about updating from mkii to mkiv, I have
solved some of the issues by trial and error but am beginning to identify
the ones I can't resolve. My first minimal example is below.
I want the sections and subsections not to prefix the part and chapter
numbering, giving me
On 6/12/2019 10:32 AM, Duncan Hothersall wrote:
Thanks Hans, that's good to know. I was seeing issues which seemed to be
related to setupheader statements using command=, which are in heavy use
in our system because we use this to externalise styles. But it could
easily have been something
Thanks Hans, that's good to know. I was seeing issues which seemed to be
related to setupheader statements using command=, which are in heavy use in
our system because we use this to externalise styles. But it could easily
have been something font-related left in some of the commands.
I will work
On 6/12/2019 5:22 AM, Duncan Hothersall wrote:
Hi all.
Long-time user but haven't posted in a long while...
**
After many happy years of running a mkii set up I am finally facing the
fact that time has moved on and upgrading to mkiv.
I understand the biggest change needed to my sources is
Hi all.
Long-time user but haven't posted in a long while...
After many happy years of running a mkii set up I am finally facing the
fact that time has moved on and upgrading to mkiv.
I understand the biggest change needed to my sources is in the fonts
handling, but I am getting a few other
I’m trying to get my project from mkii to mkiv. I’m running into a font issue.
I’m using the Optima font from OS X on the Mac. My current setup is as added
below. Can someone tell me how to do that in mkiv?
\usetypescript[serif,sans,mono] [hanging] [normal]
\starttypescript [sans,serif]
Am 01.03.2015 um 11:20 schrieb Gerben Wierda gerben.wie...@rna.nl:
I’m trying to get my project from mkii to mkiv. I’m running into a font
issue. I’m using the Optima font from OS X on the Mac. My current setup is as
added below. Can someone tell me how to do that in mkiv?
On 24-2-2010 22:32, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi,
typesetting an old MkII written project with MkIV today gives more then 2000 unable
to resolve warnings, like these ...
!backends : unable to resolve destination attribute 90
what does this mean? As that project did not even have
Hi,
typesetting an old MkII written project with MkIV today gives more then 2000
unable to resolve warnings, like these ...
!pages : flushing realpage 12, userpage 16
!backends : unable to resolve destination attribute 67
!backends : unable to resolve destination
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 04.11.2008 um 21:20 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi,
Is it normal that output from MkII and MkIV are different in terms of
page
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 04.11.2008 um 21:20 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi,
Is it normal that output from MkII and MkIV are different in terms of
page breaks?
Yes. In MKII the interline space is hard
Hi,
Is it normal that output from MkII and MkIV are different in terms of
page breaks?
Greets
--
Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl)
- Why vim users don't use the ESC key?
- It's too far on the keyboard. It's faster to type ctrl-[.
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi,
Is it normal that output from MkII and MkIV are different in terms of
page breaks?
Yes. In MKII the interline space is hard coded. MKIV gets the interline
space from the font. So, you will get different page breaks. I experienced
around 2-5
Am 04.11.2008 um 21:20 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi,
Is it normal that output from MkII and MkIV are different in terms of
page breaks?
Yes. In MKII the interline space is hard coded. MKIV gets the
interline
space from the font. So, you will
Dnia Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:41:43PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster napisa#322;(a):
Am 04.11.2008 um 21:20 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi,
Is it normal that output from MkII and MkIV are different in terms of
page breaks?
Yes. In MKII the
Thank you for your prompt answers. I am a bit surprised, though, that
the otf and Type1 Latin Modern fonts are not compatible. Strange thing.
You should come to BachoTeX. In 2007 Jerzy Ludwichowski and Bogusław
Jackowski started their talk about TeX Gyre by screaming Full
compatibility
Dnia Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:06:13PM +0100, Arthur Reutenauer napisa#322;(a):
Thank you for your prompt answers. I am a bit surprised, though, that
the otf and Type1 Latin Modern fonts are not compatible. Strange thing.
You should come to BachoTeX. In 2007 Jerzy Ludwichowski and
Am 04.11.2008 um 22:51 schrieb Marcin Borkowski:
Dnia Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:06:13PM +0100, Arthur Reutenauer
napisa#322;(a):
Thank you for your prompt answers. I am a bit surprised, though,
that
the otf and Type1 Latin Modern fonts are not compatible. Strange
thing.
You should
Dnia Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:02:13PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster napisa#322;(a):
Am 04.11.2008 um 22:51 schrieb Marcin Borkowski:
Dnia Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:06:13PM +0100, Arthur Reutenauer
napisa#322;(a):
Thank you for your prompt answers. I am a bit surprised, though,
that
the
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 04.11.2008 um 21:20 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi,
Is it normal that output from MkII and MkIV are different in terms of
page breaks?
Yes. In MKII the interline space is hard coded. MKIV gets the
24 matches
Mail list logo
