Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 06:32:13PM -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:45:10 -0600, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Khaled Hosny wrote:
Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the
font ha
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 06:32:13PM -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:45:10 -0600, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Khaled Hosny wrote:
> >> Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the
> >> font has a glyph for it, it doe
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:45:31 -0600, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
>>> Can this be made an option, so fonts that contain zwj zwnj are not
>>> affected?
>> ok, the next version will have
>>
>> otf.remove_joiners = true -- default
>
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:45:31 -0600, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
>> Can this be made an option, so fonts that contain zwj zwnj are not
>> affected?
>
> ok, the next version will have
>
> otf.remove_joiners = true -- default
Our main test fonts + professional f
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
> Can this be made an option, so fonts that contain zwj zwnj are not
> affected?
ok, the next version will have
otf.remove_joiners = true -- default
later we can make it an option in the font definition
-
Hi Hans,
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:45:10 -0600, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Khaled Hosny wrote:
>> Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the
>> font has a glyph for it, it does the expected behaviour (force
>> non-joining or joining respectively) but the gl
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 05:45:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Khaled Hosny wrote:
> > Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the
> > font has a glyph for it, it does the expected behaviour (force
> > non-joining or joining respectively) but the glyph get rendered while
Khaled Hosny wrote:
> Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the
> font has a glyph for it, it does the expected behaviour (force
> non-joining or joining respectively) but the glyph get rendered while it
> shouldn't. But if the font has no glyphs for it, it has no eff
Khaled Hosny wrote:
> Using Luatex engine, ZWNJ and ZWJ chars are rendered incorrectly. If the
> font has a glyph for it, it does the expected behaviour (force
> non-joining or joining respectively) but the glyph get rendered while it
> shouldn't. But if the font has no glyphs for it, it has no eff
