Dne petek 29. oktobra 2010 ob 11:24:36 je Hans Hagen napisal(a):
> first update then
Will do, thanks :)
Cheers,
Matija
--
gsm:+386 41 849 552
www:http://matija.suklje.name
xmpp: matija.suk...@gabbler.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
On 29-10-2010 12:52, Matija Šuklje wrote:
Dne petek 29. oktobra 2010 ob 00:42:20 je Hans Hagen napisal(a):
On 29-10-2010 12:17, Matija Šuklje wrote:
Hullo,
from what I can understand I'm using \footnote correctly (i.e. as on
wiki), but if I generate the document with 'context' every footnote
i
Dne petek 29. oktobra 2010 ob 00:42:20 je Hans Hagen napisal(a):
> On 29-10-2010 12:17, Matija Šuklje wrote:
> > Hullo,
> >
> > from what I can understand I'm using \footnote correctly (i.e. as on
> > wiki), but if I generate the document with 'context' every footnote
> > instance is just a direct
On 29-10-2010 12:17, Matija Šuklje wrote:
Hullo,
from what I can understand I'm using \footnote correctly (i.e. as on wiki),
but if I generate the document with 'context' every footnote instance is just
a direct copy of the first footnote.
If I generate it with 'texexec' though, the footnotes a
Hullo,
from what I can understand I'm using \footnote correctly (i.e. as on wiki),
but if I generate the document with 'context' every footnote instance is just
a direct copy of the first footnote.
If I generate it with 'texexec' though, the footnotes are generated as
expected.
Is that a MkIV