Re: [NTG-context] Intsalling modules - once more

2014-08-19 Thread Werner Hintze
I made a new step: I found out how to change the script in Texnicle. It was for MKII, now I changed it to MKIV. It works well now. The problem is just the module fancybreak. When I try to use it, I get the message »Undefined control sequence«. Some lines before I find: »resolvers

[NTG-context] Intsalling modules - once more

2014-08-18 Thread Werner Hintze
If nobody can tell me how to install the module ”fancybreak« on Mac OS (may be the question is too stupid), can anybody tell me where I find the needed information? The wiki doesn't help me because I don’t know $TEXMF. Thanks! WH P.S.: I had no problem to install the module in the stand

[NTG-context] Intsalling modules - once more

2014-08-18 Thread Akira Kakuto
If nobody can tell me how to install the module ”fancybreak« on Mac OS ... It may be OK by the following: After checking files /usr/local/texlive/texmf-local/doc/context/third/fancybreak/fancybreak-doc.pdf /usr/local/texlive/texmf-local/doc/context/third/fancybreak/README

Re: [NTG-context] Intsalling modules - once more

2014-08-18 Thread Werner Hintze
Thank you. The files are in the right places, I believe, it was only »sudo mktexlsr« lacking. (This is not mentioned in the wiki. Unforunately it doesn't help. Now the module is found, but I get an error message when it is used. This seems to be an issue with the TextLive distribution,

Re: [NTG-context] Intsalling modules - once more

2014-08-18 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Werner Hintze wrote: Thank you. The files are in the right places, I believe, it was only »sudo mktexlsr« lacking. (This is not mentioned in the wiki. Unforunately it doesn't help. Now the module is found, Are you using MkII? mktexlsr should not be needed for MkIV. You

Re: [NTG-context] Intsalling modules - once more

2014-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 18.08.2014 um 10:15 schrieb Werner Hintze w.hin...@posteo.eu: If nobody can tell me how to install the module ”fancybreak« on Mac OS (may be the question is too stupid), can anybody tell me where I find the needed information? The wiki doesn't help me because I don’t know $TEXMF. You

Re: [NTG-context] Intsalling modules - once more

2014-08-18 Thread Werner Hintze
I don’t know if I use MKII or not. I understood that not. But in the log file I see something about the module for MKII: system : module fancybreak (mkii) loaded (/usr/local/texlive/texmf-local/tex/context/third/fancybreak/t-fancybreak.mkii loading : ConTeXt User Module /

Re: [NTG-context] Intsalling modules - once more

2014-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 18.08.2014 um 16:41 schrieb Werner Hintze w.hin...@posteo.eu: I don’t know if I use MKII or not. I understood that not. But in the log file I see something about the module for MKII: system : module fancybreak (mkii) loaded

Re: [NTG-context] Intsalling modules - once more

2014-08-18 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Werner Hintze wrote: I don’t know if I use MKII or not. (Simplified version). If you compile the file using `context filename` you are using MkIV; if you compile the file using `texexec filename` you are using MkII. Unless you have a really good reason to stick to

Re: [NTG-context] Intsalling modules - once more

2014-08-18 Thread Werner Hintze
On 18 Aug 2014, at 15:42, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: You can unzip the content of the zip-file in your local tex tree. This was my first try. And the first time I saw the message »module not found«. After this I looked in the wiki and used the other path (/usr/local etc.) — with the same

Re: [NTG-context] Intsalling modules - once more

2014-08-18 Thread Werner Hintze
On 18 Aug 2014, at 16:56, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Your problem is the line above where you use “einrueckung” as keyword for \setupindenting which is invalid and causes the error message. Aha. Strange. When I use the stand alone version, this is no problem. And if I comment out the lines with

Re: [NTG-context] Intsalling modules - once more

2014-08-18 Thread Werner Hintze
Well: I use MKIV. On 18 Aug 2014, at 17:05, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Werner Hintze wrote: I don’t know if I use MKII or not. (Simplified version). If you compile the file using `context filename` you are using MkIV; if you compile the file using `texexec filename` you

Re: [NTG-context] Intsalling modules - once more

2014-08-18 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Werner Hintze wrote: On 18 Aug 2014, at 17:05, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Werner Hintze wrote: I don’t know if I use MKII or not. (Simplified version). If you compile the file using `context filename` you are using MkIV; if you compile the file using

Re: [NTG-context] Intsalling modules - once more

2014-08-18 Thread Werner Hintze
On 18 Aug 2014, at 18:17, Aditya Mahajan wrote: MkIV will not load .mkii files. What is the exact command that you use to run context? Aha! You found the point! I use Texnicle as editor and the context engine Texnicle provides. It calls texexec... But it’s not enough to put here context.

Re: [NTG-context] Intsalling modules - once more

2014-08-18 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 18.08.2014 um 19:03 schrieb Werner Hintze w.hin...@posteo.eu: On 18 Aug 2014, at 18:17, Aditya Mahajan wrote: MkIV will not load .mkii files. What is the exact command that you use to run context? Aha! You found the point! I use Texnicle as editor and the context engine Texnicle