Re: [NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-18 Thread Hans Hagen
Adam Lindsay wrote: Seeing this thread, I wonder now if there's any more interest in helping ship a cont-sys.tex and a texexec.ini (before it goes away) that is tuned to gwTeX? just a thought: if we have context/base/gwtex/cont-sys.tex and some clever search path in texmf.cnf that locates that

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-17 Thread Matthias Weber
I am not even sure where the problem lies, as I am not at all familiar with what gets changed for the Mac distribution. I only noted that with the Mac gwTeX beta for ConTeXT, i) the font test file with palatino etc doesn't work properly, ii) replacing the cont-sys.rme in the beta distribution tre

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-17 Thread Adam Lindsay
Seeing this thread, I wonder now if there's any more interest in helping ship a cont-sys.tex and a texexec.ini (before it goes away) that is tuned to gwTeX? adam On 16 Mar 2005, at 19:08, Matthias Weber wrote: Patrick tracked this down do an old cont-sys.rme, and my guess is that it is erroneo

[NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-17 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hello, > i wonder why in some cases uplr is used and in other situations pplr. > > - maybe palatino px does not go well with the adobekb file? Probably, but I've got mine typeset correctly, so I still wonder why. > - maybe some magick auto-name-remapping via the aliases file? Mystery, not magic

[NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-17 Thread Patrick Gundlach
[...] >>> >> 8r.86pk> >> >> that's the first time i've seen a palatino bitmap come by; i wonder >> what generates them and from what > > It looks really ugly :), as it is only 44k, I attach it for your > amusement. /me is loughing! That looks gross. > a very clean (i.e. untouched by myself...)

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-17 Thread Hans Hagen
Patrick Gundlach wrote: Is there somebody else out there using Gerben's TeXstuff? (I know there is at least one :-)) I can only guess. Or get a fresh cont-sys.tex (www.pragma-ade.com/system/tex/texmf-local/tex/context/user/cont-sys.tex) and play with that one. when no cont-sys.tex is found (or when

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-17 Thread Hans Hagen
Matthias Weber wrote: [...] pxex.pfb rpxmi.pfb uplr8a.pfb pxsy.pfb rpxr.pfb uplri8a.pfb> These look ok. i wonder why in some cases uplr is used and in other situations pplr. - maybe palatino px does not go well with the adobekb file? - maybe some magick auto-name-remapping via the aliases file? (m

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-16 Thread Matthias Weber
On Mar 16, 2005, at 2:01 PM, Willi Egger wrote: Hi Mathias, your example runs smoothly here, using: pdfeTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.20a-2.2 ConTeXt ver: 2005.01.26 fmt: 2005.1.26 Thanks for looking at this, but :) pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) ConTeXt ver: 2005.

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-16 Thread Willi Egger
Hi Mathias, your example runs smoothly here, using: pdfeTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.20a-2.2 ConTeXt ver: 2005.01.26 fmt: 2005.1.26 1. Which version of ContTeXt do you run? A new version requires the map-files to be placed in ...\fonts\map. 2. Niew versions of pdftex do nomore use

[NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-16 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hello Matthias, > Everything appears to be ok now -- Good News! Now I can go out and celebrate St. Patrick's Day tomorrow :-)) > So I guess this file should have been updated but wasn't for some > reason. Perhaps other GWTEX users should check that as well? Patrick -- ConTeXt wiki: http:/

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-16 Thread Matthias Weber
Hi, I replaced my cont-sys.rme with the one at www.pragma-ade.com/system/tex/texmf-local/tex/context/user/cont-sys.rme Everything appears to be ok now -- the difference between the two files seems to be the following if-statement in the OLD file: \donefalse \ifx\pdftexversion\undefined \else \

[NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-16 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi, [...] > kpsewhich ec-base.map > > returns > > /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/fonts/map/pdftex/context/ec-base.map oh, stupid me! It was already mentioned in the log file. Sorry. > I am using Gerben's TeX installation via iinstaller, without any own > changes. Can you copy the cont-sys

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-16 Thread Matthias Weber
[...] kpsewhich ec-base.map returns /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/fonts/map/pdftex/context/ec-base.map and there it is indeed -- I had used locate beforfe. I am using Gerben's TeX installation via iinstaller, without any own changes. Matthias On Mar 16, 2005, at 11:45 AM, Patrick Gundlach wr

[NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-16 Thread Patrick Gundlach
[...] > I tried to locate ec-base.map, but couldn't find it. Is this a regular > file somewhere in the TeX tree? It should be in texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/context/ec-base.map ConTeXt ships this file. "kpsewhich ec-base.map" does not give you any result? What distribution are you using? Patrick

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-16 Thread Hans Hagen
Matthias Weber wrote: /teTeX/share/texmf.local/fonts/map/pdftex/context/original-public- lm.map} Warning: pdfetex (file ec-urw-courier.map): cannot open font map file Warning: pdfetex (file ec-urw-helvetica.map): cannot open font map file Warning: pdfetex (file ec-urw-times.map): cannot open font m

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-16 Thread Matthias Weber
Sorry, forgot to attach cont-sys.rme - see below Matthias -- %D \module %D [ file=cont-sys, %Dversion=1995.10.10, %D title=\CONTEXT\ Miscellaneous Macros, %D subtitle=System Specific Setups, %D author=Hans Hagen, %D date=\currentdate, %D cop

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-16 Thread Matthias Weber
My cont-sys.rme is in /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/tex/context/user/cont-sys.rme and has the two lines you mention (I attach the file below, it looks kind of old (1995). Also, if I add \loadmapfile[ec-base.map] nothing changes --- I tried to locate ec-base.map, but couldn't find it. Is this

[NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-16 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi, ok, you are already using ec encoding as default, \setupencoding[default=ec] has of course no effect then. [...] > pxex.pfb > rpxmi.pfb > uplr8a.pfb > pxsy.pfb > rpxr.pfb > uplri8a.pfb> These look ok. > 8r.86pk> There it is. There must be something wrong with your map file. How does yo

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-16 Thread Matthias Weber
Hi Patrick, thanks for looking into this. Log file follows, \setupencoding[default=ec] has no effect. Matthias TeXExec 5.2.5 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005 executable : pdfetex format : cont-en inputfile : Untitled-2 output : pdftex

[NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-16 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi, your file works fine here. Can you post your log file? Or try \setupencoding[default=ec]. But this shouldn't make any differences. Patrick -- ConTeXt wiki: http://contextgarden.net ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Palatino? -> bitmap fonts???

2005-03-16 Thread Matthias Weber
Hello, I am not desperate to use new fonts right now, but whenever I see somebody with a success I'll give it a try. Here is what happens to me when trying to use palatino (or any of the other fonts) with the sample file (Mac OS X, most recent gwTeX) %% testing-fonts.tex \usetypescript [adobekb][\